『The Gamble: Who is seated at the table, or who is on the menu?』のカバーアート

The Gamble: Who is seated at the table, or who is on the menu?

The Gamble: Who is seated at the table, or who is on the menu?

無料で聴く

ポッドキャストの詳細を見る

【Amazonプライム会員限定】今ならプレミアムプランが4か月 月額99円。

10月19日まで。※適用条件あり
Your Retirement Account the MachineThey Manage $30 Trillion. That’s The Problem.Over the past few years, several family members passed away. As is the case with such situations, the insurance policies, 401(k)s, and other financial accounts had to be closed out. However, something peculiar caught my attention: the same companies were involved in every transaction, albeit under different names. This led me to believe that these companies were connected to the same three entities. Naturally, I was curious about the nature of these relationships, so I decided to investigate further.Let me tell you something that’s going to sound like a conspiracy theory.BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street three companies you’ve probably never interacted with directly, manage over $30 trillion. That’s more than the entire U.S. economy. And they’re the largest shareholder in 88% of the S&P 500.Your bank. Your airline. Your pharmacy. Your grocery store. Your hospital.Same three names at the top of the ownership list. Every time.Now here’s the part where I’m supposed to tell you it’s a conspiracy. That there’s a smoke-filled room somewhere with guys named “Buzzy” deciding the fate of your 401(k) over scotch.But here’s the thing: there’s no conspiracy.It’s worse than that. It’s just math.How We Got Here (And Why Nobody Voted On It)The pitch was beautiful. Simple. Cheap.Jack Bogle, the patron saint of the retail investor, created the index fund in the 1970s. The idea was almost communitarian: don’t try to beat the market, be the market. Buy a slice of everything. Pay almost nothing in fees. Let the winners and losers cancel each other out over time.And it worked. It worked spectacularly. Millions of Americans who never had access to professional money management suddenly had a piece of corporate America.But here’s the catch nobody saw coming: index funds don’t sell.If you own an S&P 500 fund, you own every company in the S&P 500. When Ford has a bad quarter, you don’t bail. When Coca-Cola’s CEO does something stupid, you don’t storm the gates. You just... hold. That’s the deal. You bought the whole basket. You’re riding it to the bottom or the top.Now multiply that by trillions of dollars. And here’s where the story gets weird.The Monopoly You Never NoticedOnce enough money piles into index funds, the ownership starts to concentrate in the hands of the few companies that manage them. BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street now collectively control somewhere between 20 and 30 percent of most major public companies. They cast roughly a quarter of all shareholder votes.They didn’t buy control. They didn’t stage hostile takeovers. They just... accumulated. Because you and I and everyone we know kept buying index funds.And now, because they own everything, they own every competitor in the same industry.Think about that for a second.Vanguard is a top shareholder in United Airlines. And Delta. And American. And Southwest. BlackRock owns chunks of every major bank. Every major pharma company. Every major grocery chain.They’re not picking winners. They’re picking all the horses. And that creates a very strange incentive structure that nobody voted on.The Evidence: What Actually HappensYale researchers studied this. They found that in industries with high “common ownership” where the same investors own all the major competitor executives get paid more for their rivals’ success than their own.Read that again.If you’re the CEO of, say, Pepsi, and Coca-Cola has a great year, your compensation might actually, increase. Why? Because the people who own your company also own Coca-Cola. And they don’t care which one wins. They just want the industry to be profitable overall.Which means: less aggressive competition. Less risk-taking. Less of the scrappy, cutthroat capitalism that’s supposed to make the machine work.And here’s the part that really gets under my skin: Duke Law researchers ran the numbers on what would happen if these giant index funds just... abstained from voting. Or voted with management. Or did any of the proposed reforms being floated in Washington.You know how many votes would flip?Twelve. Out of 645,000.That’s 0.002%.The reforms on the table? They’re theater. They’re designed to look like action without changing anything. Because the real problem isn’t how these funds vote. It’s that they own everything in the first place.The Honest Counter-ArgumentNow, I promised you the counter-argument. And it’s a good one.Here it is: This might not actually be a problem.Or at least, not the kind of problem that’s easy to fix.The case for the Big Three goes like this: index funds have democratized investing in a way nothing else ever has. Fees have plummeted from 1% to 0.03%. Millions of people who would have been fleeced by active managers now have a cheap, effective way to build wealth. And when the Big Three do engage with companies on governance, on ...
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
まだレビューはありません