エピソード

  • E153 The Fifth Court - Who Really Built Ireland's Legal System? Daire Hogan on Judges Who Shaped Irish History
    2026/07/14

    For more than a century, Ireland's judges shaped the country's politics, business, land ownership and legal system.

    But who were they?


    On Episode 153 of The Fifth Court, Peter Leonard BL and Mark Tottenham BL are joined by legal historian Daire Hogan, former McCann FitzGerald partner, former President of the Irish Legal History Society and author of the remarkable new book The Judges of Ireland 1866–1921.


    It's a fascinating conversation about Victorian Ireland, judicial power, Westminster politics, the Four Courts, Home Rule, the birth of the modern legal system and some extraordinary judicial personalities whose influence is still felt today.


    Along the way they discuss:

    • why 1877 completely changed Irish courts

    • the astonishing political influence behind judicial appointments

    • why some judges nearly sailed on the Titanic

    • how Irish judges were viewed in London

    • the origins of today's High Court and Court of Appeal

    • what legal history tells us about modern Ireland


    Before Daire Hogan joins Peter and Mark, Mark reviews three important recent decisions from Decisis, kindly brought to listeners with the support of Charlton Solicitors & Collaborative Practitioners, specialists in family law, civil litigation, property, wills and probate.

    The featured cases include:


    • Adoption without parental consent
    • Security for costs
    • Legal professional privilege and shareholder rights


    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    46 分
  • E152 The Fifth Court - Jimmy Wales, Wikipedia founder, on trust, AI and why the internet still needs rules
    2026/07/01

    Episode 152 of The Fifth Court features a very special guest: Jimmy Wales, founder of Wikipedia

    Interviewed by Mark Tottenham BL at Dalkey Book Festival.


    This is not just a tech-founder interview. It is a fascinating conversation about law, trust, neutrality, rules, evidence, platform responsibility, AI hallucinations, volunteer communities, public knowledge and why Wikipedia has survived while much of the internet has become angrier, noisier and less trusted.


    Jimmy explains why Wikipedia’s neutral point of view matters, why “assume good faith” is more practical than naïve, how Wikipedia deals with vandalism, why AI can invent very convincing false sources, why WikiNews did not work, and why Wikipedia avoided the advertising model that turned so much of the web into clickbait.

    Jimmy's cultural recommendation, a book by the late author Ray Bradbury, 'Something Wicked this Way Comes'.


    Before the interview, Peter Leonard BL and Mark Tottenham BL discuss three recent cases from the Decisis Casebook, sponsored by Charltons Solicitors & Collaborative Practitioners: the Supreme Court on “no foal, no fee” and conditional fee arrangements; a drink-driving blood-specimen chain-of-custody case; and a murder conviction quashed because of an unbalanced judicial charge to the jury.


    00:00 – Intro: Episode 152

    01:47 – Decisis Casebook sponsor: Charltons Solicitors & Collaborative Practitioners

    02:00 – “No foal, no fee” and conditional fee arrangements

    03:29 – Drink-driving conviction and blood-specimen chain of custody

    04:34 – Murder conviction quashed over judicial charge to jury

    06:03 – Jimmy Wales interview begins

    06:43 – Why Wikipedia was hard to compete with

    07:58 – Neutral point of view and controversial topics

    09:49 – How Wikipedia’s rules developed

    11:40 – Volunteer communities and optimism about people

    15:12 – Why a wiki works for an encyclopedia, but maybe not for poetry

    17:03 – Why Wikipedia is vandal-proof

    18:30 – Jimmy Wales: “Queen Elizabeth II, not Henry VIII”

    20:07 – Arbitration committees and Wikipedia governance

    21:24 – Wikipedia in 150–300 languages

    23:31 – What workplaces can learn from volunteers

    29:06 – Audrey Tang, Taiwan and digital consensus

    32:10 – “Assume good faith”

    34:25 – ChatGPT, fake ISBNs and made-up legal cases

    37:17 – Law enforcement and good faith

    39:03 – Why WikiNews did not really work

    44:12 – Constitutional change and institutional deadlock

    49:37 – Platforms, publishers and free speech

    50:25 – Why Wikipedia did not become an ad machine

    53:04 – Jimmy Wales’ book recommendation: Something Wicked This Way Comes

    54:33 – Outro


    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    55 分
  • E151 The Fifth Court - Peter Charleton Part 2: what judges really worry about
    2026/06/23

    In Part 2 of our extended interview with retired Supreme Court judge Mr Justice Peter Charleton, Peter Leonard BL and Mark Tottenham BL continue a remarkable conversation about life at the Bar, life on the Bench, and life after the Supreme Court.


    Peter Charleton speaks about the reality of appearing in high-profile criminal cases, the discipline of addressing juries, why a good advocate must be able to hold attention, and why, in court, “your job is basically to stay on the horse”.


    He discusses the emotional weight of criminal work, the dangers of lawyers mistaking themselves for victims, the Morris Tribunal, the call to the High Court, the pressure of judgment writing, and the move from sitting alone in the High Court to deciding cases with colleagues in the Supreme Court.


    There is also a fascinating discussion on the length of modern judgments, why digital searches are different from physical searches, how Supreme Court judges deal with disagreement, and whether advocacy still matters in an age of written submissions.


    And, in a lovely final turn, Peter Charleton reflects on retirement, family, music, film, War and Peace, Clint Eastwood, and why music, in his view, is a higher form of reasoning than law.


    Before the interview, Mark and Peter discuss three recent cases from the Decisis.ie casebook, with thanks to the sponsor of the Decisis casebook discussion, Charltons Solicitors and Collaborative Practitioners of George’s Street, Dún Laoghaire, who specialise in family law, civil litigation, property, wills and probate.


    LSRA v O’Brien

    A solicitor was prohibited from practising in his own right for 10 years following serious misconduct and repeated non-compliance with undertakings. The High Court stressed that its role in reviewing LSRA determinations is not a rubber-stamping exercise.


    LSRA v Salabi

    An overseas lawyer seeking to practise in Ireland could not rely on Belgian professional indemnity cover. The court held that the foreign cover did not meet the Irish regulatory requirements.


    Foreign Births Register citizenship challenge

    A challenge to the requirement that foreign-born children be registered on the Foreign Births Register before acquiring Irish citizenship was rejected, with the court finding no particular injustice in the requirement.


    CHAPTERS

    00:00 Introduction and Part 2 preview

    00:48 Decisis casebook discussion, sponsored by Charltons Solicitors and Collaborative Practitioners

    03:49 Peter Charleton interview resumes

    04:31 High-profile criminal cases and staying on the horse

    05:15 Addressing juries and holding attention

    07:13 Worrying about cases and professional regret

    08:08 Criminal work, vicarious trauma and perspective

    09:03 The Morris Tribunal and Donegal

    10:37 The call to the High Court

    11:43 Why judging was not easier than being a barrister

    13:48 How to write a judgment

    15:46 Are modern judgments too long?

    18:07 Digital searches and privacy

    19:52 Moving from the High Court to the Supreme Court

    20:22 Keeping an open mind on appeal

    21:30 Overturning colleagues and why it is not personal

    23:45 Irish courts, US courts and the politics of judging

    26:26 Is great advocacy dead?

    28:38 Retirement from the Supreme Court

    30:41 Life after the Bench

    31:22 Music, law and philosophy

    32:47 Film and book recommendations

    34:45 Closing thanks

    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    36 分
  • E150 The Fifth Court - Mr Justice Peter Charleton: law, crime, music and the nature of evil
    2026/06/18



    The Fifth Court marks Episode 150 with Part 1 of a wide-ranging conversation with recently retired Supreme Court judge, Peter Charleton.


    To mark Episode 150 of The Fifth Court, Peter Leonard BL and Mark Tottenham BL are joined by Mr Justice Peter Charleton, recently retired from the Supreme Court.

    In Part 1 of this extended interview, he reflects on republicanism and nationalism, growing up near Seán Lemass and Theodore Kingsmill Moore, music, Trinity, the King’s Inns, devilling with Peter Sutherland, early years at the Bar, criminal law, defending accused persons, and the deeper questions of crime, morality and human nature.

    It is a thoughtful, personal and sometimes unexpectedly funny conversation with one of Ireland’s best-known jurists.


    Before the interview, Mark and Peter discuss three recent cases from the Decisis.ie casebook.

    The Decisis.ie case-law section is sponsored by Charlton Solicitors and Collaborative Practitioners of Dún Laoghaire.


    Case 1: The High Court quashed a District Court judge’s refusal to convict in speed-limit cases, holding that judges must apply the law rather than substitute their own views on whether limits are fair.

    Case 2: In DPP v O’Hara, the Court of Appeal upheld a murder and burglary conviction, rejecting challenges to DNA and search-warrant evidence.

    Case 3: In a Hague Convention child-abduction case, the court refused to return a child to New Zealand because of concerns about the mother’s depression and risk of relapse.


    This is Part 1 of a two-part interview. Part II will be posted next week.


    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    39 分
  • E149 The Fifth Court - Bridget Hourican on Frank Callanan’s Joycean masterpiece
    2026/06/09

    Bloomsday Special: The secret political life of James Joyce — and Frank Callanan’s final masterpiece


    Was James Joyce really apolitical?

    For decades, many scholars claimed Ireland's greatest writer stood apart from politics.


    Frank Callanan disagreed.

    Before his untimely death, the renowned barrister, historian and Parnell scholar spent 25 years researching what became his final work: James Joyce: A Political Life.

    In this special Bloomsday episode of The Fifth Court, Bridget Hourican joins Peter Leonard and Mark Tottenham to discuss Frank's extraordinary final book, his lifelong fascination with Joyce, Parnell, Irish nationalism, exile, censorship and the political forces that shaped modern Ireland.

    The conversation also becomes a moving tribute to Frank himself — one of the most beloved and intellectually gifted members of the Law Library.

    Among the topics discussed:



    • Why Frank spent 25 years researching Joyce
    • The political meaning hidden inside Ulysses and Dubliners
    • Joyce's obsession with Parnell
    • Why Dublin publishers burned copies of Dubliners
    • Joyce, censorship and Irish respectability
    • Why Joyce left Ireland and never truly returned
    • Frank Callanan's remarkable legal and academic career
    • The challenge of completing a 900-page masterpiece after his death


    For anyone interested in law, literature, Irish history or Bloomsday, this is a fascinating conversation.

    Book recommendation:

    James Joyce: A Political Life by Frank Callanan



    Decisis casebook section sponsored by Charlton Solicitors & Collaborative Practitioners.


    1. The runaway truck case

    Duggan v Logan (Mr Justice Oisín Quinn)

    A driver was seriously injured when a truck rolled out of a filling station and into traffic with nobody behind the wheel after the driver failed to apply the handbrake.

    Why it matters:

    The High Court awarded damages of approximately €128,000 and provides a reminder that leaving a vehicle unsecured can create liability even when the driver is physically absent from the vehicle.

    2. Turkish worker wins immigration rights challenge

    Ozek v Minister for Justice (Mr Justice Simons)

    A Turkish migrant worker successfully challenged the Minister's refusal to properly backdate an immigration permission.

    Why it matters:

    The Court found that EU-derived worker protections had not been correctly applied, reinforcing the importance of protecting migrant workers' rights under European law.

    3. Mother and Baby Institutions Redress Scheme

    Kiernan (otherwise John Duncan Morris) v Minister for Children (Mr Justice Owens)

    A claimant challenged a decision that certain institutions were not covered by the Mother and Baby Institutions Payment Scheme.

    Why it matters:

    The Court held that the legislation should be interpreted more broadly and that the applicant was entitled to seek redress under the scheme. The decision may affect how eligibility is assessed in future claims.

    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    38 分
  • E148 The Fifth Court - Peter Shanley SC -Barristers Direct, legal access & barristers as entrepreneurs
    2026/05/18

    Episode 148, The Fifth Court

    Peter Shanley SC on Barristers Direct, legal access and barristers becoming entrepreneurs


    Peter Leonard BL and Mark Tottenham BL are joined by Peter Shanley SC, founder of Barristers Direct.

    Peter explains how changes under the Legal Services Regulation Act opened the door to direct access to barristers in non-contentious matters, why Barristers Direct was created, and how the service works for individuals, companies, in-house counsel and solicitors.

    He also talks family legal dynasty, rugby, the late Peter Shanley, direct access, AI note-taking, probate, employment law, defamation, and why solicitors may actually benefit from the service.


    The Decisis.ie case-law section, sponsored by Charlton Solicitors & Collaborative Practitioners of George’s Street, Dún Laoghaire, covers:

    A suspended trade union member allowed to contest an Executive Council election

    A Hague Convention child-return case involving Ireland and Poland

    Citizenship refusals based on historic criminal convictions


    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    31 分
  • E147 The Fifth Court - John O’Donnell SC on Law, Literature and Life
    2026/05/08

    ON this episode of The Fifth Court, Peter Leonard BL and Mark Tottenham BL are joined by John O’Donnell SC — one of the Bar’s leading advocates… and one of Ireland’s most quietly brilliant writers. This is a conversation that moves from the Four Courts to the writing desk — and back again.

    We step into a different courtroom entirely — the imagination.

    John O’Donnell SC discusses:

    • Winning the Francis McManus Short Story Award
    • Writing Mr. Who — a story inspired by a real criminal case
    • The discipline of writing daily at 6:30am
    • Why short stories thrive in Ireland
    • And his upcoming novel Second Skin

    This is law, but not as you expect it.


    We begin, as always, with the Decisis casebook section, sponsored by Charlton Solicitors & Collaborative Practitioners, George’s Street, Dún Laoghaire, covering:

    1. Teaching Council v CD

    A school principal steals up to €100,000… and is NOT struck off. Why? Gambling addiction, remorse, and the court’s willingness to give a second chance.

    2. Pepper Finance Corporation v Ward

    A default judgment overturned… after SEVEN years. Solicitor misconduct, delay, and “special circumstances” collide.

    3. O’Callaghan v O’Callaghan

    A family hotel empire tears itself apart. Misrepresentation vs arbitration — and why the court said: “Off you go… to arbitration.”


    Chapters

    00:00 – Intro

    02:00 – Decisis Sponsor: Charlton Solicitors & Collaborative Practitioners

    02:15 – Case 1: Teacher theft & second chances

    05:30 – Case 2: Default judgment after 7 years

    08:00 – Case 3: Family hotel war & arbitration

    10:30 – John O’Donnell SC interview begins

    18:00 – From barrister to poet

    25:00 – Writing discipline: 6:30am starts

    32:00 – Mr. Who: crime, imagination, and narrative

    40:00 – Law as inspiration for fiction

    50:00 – Poetry reading

    57:00 – Fastnet Film Festival & courtroom dramas

    01:02:00 – Close

    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    45 分
  • E146 The Fifth Court - Your Reputation on Trial — And Why the Rules Are Changing - John Kerr
    2026/04/17

    Your Reputation on Trial — And Why the Rules Are Changing


    This is not just another legal interview. This is a story about growing up under armed protection, about a father who became the last Law Lord in the UK, and about a legal system that is about to change in a very big way.


    John Kerr — barrister, defamation specialist, and colleague — joins us to talk about:

    • What it was like living through the Troubles with security at the front gate
    • Why his father became the “Great Dissenter” in the UK Supreme Court
    • The truth about defamation cases — and why juries may be scrapped
    • And what happens when your reputation becomes your livelihood


    Plus:

    Three fascinating Decisis cases including dead-person defamation, missing expert witnesses, and multi-million euro stud fees. Decisis is brought to you thanks to Charltons Solicitors and Collaborative Practitioners.


    defamation law Ireland, jury trials Ireland, Brian Kerr judge, UK Supreme Court law lords, Irish barristers, Paul Tweed defamation, legal podcast Ireland, Fifth Court podcast, Irish courts cases, Decisis cases Ireland, John Kerr barrister, freedom of expression law


    TIMELINE

    00:00 Intro + Decisis sponsor mention

    02:00 Defamation after death — can you sue?

    05:15 Lost expert witness — trial goes ahead anyway

    08:30 Coolmore stud fees — big money, no excuses

    12:00 John Kerr — defamation specialist

    14:00 Growing up in Northern Ireland during the Troubles

    17:00 Armed guards, relocation, and real risk

    20:00 The career of Lord Kerr — last Law Lord

    25:00 The “Great Dissenter” — why minority judgments matter

    30:00 From solicitor to barrister — taking the leap

    34:00 Defamation reform — are juries finished?

    40:00 Big awards, big problems — reality vs headlines

    47:00 International defamation and celebrity cases

    50:00 Book & film recommendations


    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    39 分