エピソード

  • A Geo-Cultural Lens Into Technology and Education (S4 E4)

    A Geo-Cultural Lens Into Technology and Education (S4 E4)
    2026/11/11
    A couple of years ago Donald visited South Korea and watched four- and five-year-olds build models of an ecosystem powered by solar energy. In the spring of 2025 he visited a C-STEM teaching and experimental building inside a school in Nanjing, China, and spoke at a seminar in Shanghai with the educators behind it. In neither country did anyone ask whether technology belonged in the curriculum. This episode follows four governments answering the same question four ways: China required artificial intelligence instruction everywhere and set limits on the tool; South Korea rolled out AI digital textbooks, committed over 500 billion won, and watched teachers, parents, and voters reverse the plan within a semester; Vietnam piloted a framework with 101,000 teachers and 1.29 million students and then scaled it nationwide; the United States set a national goal and left the classroom to districts and companies. Underneath all four is a second source in the classroom that nobody vetted the way a school vets a teacher. A Stanford white paper found the language models behind most of these tools work well in English and far less well in Vietnamese or Nahuatl. Chinese researchers concluded a Western STEM curriculum could not be moved into Chinese schools as it came. The question they asked about STEM is the question every country now has to ask about artificial intelligence: whose culture is built into it, and what happens to the children whose culture is not. The episode closes with the season's recurring question, would it take root? Join the email list for the show notes, the full reference list, and the written companion to every episode, plus the series reading list to start: https://podcast.donaldeastonbrooks.com/subscribe?from=podcast
    続きを読む 一部表示
    20 分
  • The Culture of Mathematics: Street Vendors, Written Tests, and Who Can See What a Child Knows (S4 E3)

    The Culture of Mathematics: Street Vendors, Written Tests, and Who Can See What a Child Knows (S4 E3)
    2026/11/04
    In Recife, Brazil, in the early 1980s, researchers posed as customers and bought coconuts, popcorn, and lemons from five children who worked the street markets. The children got 98 percent of the arithmetic right. A week later, on paper, with the same numbers, they got most of it wrong. This episode follows that finding: what the children knew, why the written test could not count it, and the Brazilian mathematician who named the problem ethnomathematics the same year. Then it follows the method of looking to places where adults went to find what children already knew: teachers in Tucson visiting their own students' homes and coming back with funds of knowledge; a second adult beside the teacher in the far south of Thailand who speaks Patani Malay; community teachers hired from the villages in Cambodia's highlands and moved onto the state payroll. The rule underneath: the question is never whether the knowledge is there. The question is whether the teacher in the classroom can recognize it. The episode closes with the season's recurring question, would it take root? Join the email list for the show notes, the full reference list, and the written companion to every episode, plus the series reading list to start: https://podcast.donaldeastonbrooks.com/subscribe?from=podcast
    続きを読む 一部表示
    16 分
  • What Counts as a Match: Caste, Language, and the Question Underneath (S4 E2)

    What Counts as a Match: Caste, Language, and the Question Underneath (S4 E2)
    2026/10/28
    In a village primary school in rural India, researchers compared a child with herself: one subject taught by a teacher who shared her gender, caste, and religion, another by a teacher who did not. She scored higher in the matched subject. That is ethnic matching, measured in a country where the markers are not race. This episode asks what counts as the match once the boxes on the form change: what a match has meant in the United States and why that is one country's definition; a new U.S. study finding the largest gains when a teacher shares both a student's ethnicity and language; Japan's Ainu, recognized in 2008 and 2019, and why a match cannot be studied or staffed for until the state admits a people exists. The rule underneath all of it: whoever designs the form decides what a match is. The episode closes with the season's recurring question, would it take root? Join the email list for the show notes, the full reference list, and the written companion to every episode, plus the series reading list to start: https://podcast.donaldeastonbrooks.com/subscribe?from=podcast
    続きを読む 一部表示
    15 分
  • The Language in the Room: Who Decides What a Child Learns In (S4 E1)

    The Language in the Room: Who Decides What a Child Learns In (S4 E1)
    2026/10/21
    In January 1970, the University of Ife in Nigeria began teaching a group of primary children in Yoruba for all six years of school, with English as a subject. In 2022, Nigeria made home-language instruction national policy for the early grades. In November 2025, the next government cancelled it and restored English, citing exam results. The Nigerian Academy of Education said the evidence showed the opposite. This episode follows that decision around the world. UNESCO estimates that about forty percent of the world's people are not taught in a language they understand well. Ethiopia, Tanzania, and Kenya answered the question three different ways. Brazil, Morocco, Catalonia, the Basque Country, and Aotearoa New Zealand wrote a people, or a language, into the lesson, and found that a law takes a year and teachers take a generation. In the United States the question was answered in court, in Lau v. Nichols, 1974, unanimously. The episode closes with the season's recurring question: would it take root? Join the email list for the show notes, the full reference list, and the written companion to every episode, plus the series reading list to start: https://podcast.donaldeastonbrooks.com/subscribe?from=podcast
    続きを読む 一部表示
    17 分
  • Season 4 Trailer: Whose Room Is It?

    Season 4 Trailer: Whose Room Is It?
    2026/10/14
    Season 4 of The Cultural Context of Knowledge follows one question around the world: who teaches whom, in whose language, and who decided. Eight episodes, with the United States in every one of them as one case among many. The trailer opens in four classrooms at eight in the morning, on the coast of Kenya, in central India, in Barcelona, and in San Francisco in 1970. In each, the language of the lesson is not the language of the children's homes. UNESCO estimates that about forty percent of the world's people are not taught in a language they understand well. The trailer also explains why the research season promised at the end of Season 3 is now Season 5, and closes with three questions to try before Episode 1. Join the email list for the show notes, the full reference list, and the written companion to every episode, plus the series reading list to start: https://podcast.donaldeastonbrooks.com/subscribe?from=podcast
    続きを読む 一部表示
    3 分
  • What the Communities Already Knew: Research, Method, and the Road Ahead (S3 E11)

    What the Communities Already Knew: Research, Method, and the Road Ahead (S3 E11)
    2026/08/12
    The season finale looks underneath the whole argument, at the research itself. Dr. Easton-Brooks traces how the evidence for ethnic matching got built, the qualitative scholars who recorded what communities already knew and the quantitative studies that gave it scale, and shows the two did not compete but depended on each other. He carries the season's missing column from the old datasets into the software researchers use now, where silently dropped rows can turn a study of everyone into a study of whoever trusted the survey. He walks through the tools he worked on with ReliCheck, Quanta, Quala, and MM Studio, and the Contextual Lens that keeps interpretation attached to a finding as it travels into a board meeting or a headline. Then he names the research agenda ahead, geography, higher education, mechanism, longitudinal work, and measurement itself, and points to his forthcoming book, More Than a Match: Ethnic Matching and What Schools Still Owe Students of Color. The finale closes on the one word that recurs across the season, still, and the work of retiring it. Join the email list for the show notes, the full reference list, and the written companion to every episode, plus the series reading list to start: https://podcast.donaldeastonbrooks.com/subscribe?from=podcast
    続きを読む 一部表示
    21 分
  • Beyond the Schoolhouse Door: Ethnic Matching in Higher Education (S3 E10)

    Beyond the Schoolhouse Door: Ethnic Matching in Higher Education (S3 E10)
    2026/08/05
    For nine episodes this season, ethnic matching stayed inside the PK through 12 classroom. This one steps past the schoolhouse door into higher education, where access is no longer the main barrier and the real work is belonging and cultural responsiveness. Dr. Easton-Brooks returns to the demographic wave he charted in 2009, now arrived: for the first time in United States history, more than half the population under twenty-one is People of Color. He lays out three pillars of matching in colleges and universities, classroom instruction, academic advisement, and faculty mentorship, then names the cost Faculty of Color carry once they are hired, the tenure tax and the epistemological gatekeeping that treats Eurocentric paradigms as neutral. He carries the argument past assistant professors to the chairs, deans, provosts, and presidents who set institutional priorities, and closes looking ahead to the Season 3 finale. Join the email list for the show notes, the full reference list, and the written companion to every episode, plus the series reading list to start: https://podcast.donaldeastonbrooks.com/subscribe?from=podcast
    続きを読む 一部表示
    15 分
  • From Research to Policy: Pathways That Worked, and Why Most Didn't (S3 E9)

    From Research to Policy: Pathways That Worked, and Why Most Didn't (S3 E9)
    2026/07/29
    The case for ethnic matching was built across three decades. This episode asks the question deferred just as long: what does it actually take to turn that research into policy that lasts? Dr. Easton-Brooks walks through the workforce gap that has not closed, the three structural barriers that keep it open, and the four models that have worked, from Grow Your Own programs and paid residencies to Minority Serving Institution partnerships and retention reform, naming the scholars and practitioners behind each. He draws the line between aspiration and infrastructure, sets the post-Brown displacement and the DEI rollback side by side as the same pattern in different clothes, and carries the argument out of urban districts into the suburban and rural communities usually left out of it. It closes by looking ahead, to the higher education shift he first saw coming in his 2009 demographic research. Join the email list for the show notes, the full reference list, and the written companion to every episode, plus the series reading list to start: https://podcast.donaldeastonbrooks.com/subscribe?from=podcast
    続きを読む 一部表示
    18 分