The Cornell 7 Case: Consent, Victim-Blaming & Justice | CRIM-REAPERS
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
The Cornell 7 Case: Consent, Victim-Blaming & Justice | CRIM-REAPERS
-
ナレーター：
-
著者：
Welcome to the very first episode of CRIM-REAPERS — like three peas in a pod-cast!
Three perspectives. No filter.
The Cornell 7 case has sparked difficult conversations about sexual assault allegations, consent, victim-blaming and accountability. But what happens when public outrage meets the complexities of the justice system?
In our first episode of CRIM-REAPERS, Nicky, Kate and Dave explore the case through three very different perspectives: behaviour, law and lived experience.
We discuss:
The allegations and Cornell University's disciplinary response
Consent, intoxication and the psychology of survival
Why victims' behaviour is so often scrutinised
The difference between university disciplinary action and criminal justice
How social media shapes public opinion
Expect informed discussion, challenging questions, differing opinions and the occasional bit of humour.
Three perspectives. No filter.
Subscribe to CRIM-REAPERS for more true crime, criminology and conversations that go beyond the headlines.
Content note: Discussion of alleged sexual violence, trauma and substance use. Allegations are not findings of criminal guilt.
#Cornell7 #TrueCrimePodcast #Criminology