The Attack on Hunting | Ashley Johnson Breaks Down Oregon IP28
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
-
ナレーター:
-
著者:
What happens when someone who doesn't hunt becomes one of the strongest voices advocating for the future of hunting?
In this episode of the Dreaded Archer Podcast, I sit down with Colorado resident Ashley Johnson to discuss Oregon's proposed Initiative Petition 28 (IP28) and why she believes it could have implications far beyond the state's borders. Although Ashley isn't a hunter herself, she grew up around hunting, her family hunts, and she has become a passionate advocate for wildlife conservation and science-based wildlife management.
Together, we break down what IP28 proposes, discuss the concept of ballot box biology, and explore how wildlife policy is made. We also have an honest conversation about the challenges facing the hunting community, the importance of public education, and why hunters—and even non-hunters—should stay engaged in conversations that shape the future of wildlife management.
This isn't just a conversation about Oregon. It's a conversation about conservation, civic engagement, and the future of hunting in America.
In this episode, we discuss:
- Ashley's journey into wildlife advocacy
- Oregon IP28 explained
- What is ballot box biology?
- Why this conversation extends beyond Oregon
- The role of science in wildlife management
- Common misconceptions about hunting
- How hunters can become more informed and proactive
- The future of hunting and conservation
Whether you're a lifelong hunter, new to the outdoors, or simply interested in how wildlife policy is shaped, this episode offers a thoughtful conversation on one of the most important issues facing the hunting community today.