エピソード

  • My life matters
    2026/07/31
    George Lopez heard my Spanish and said, “What is that?”
    I said, “Yte Spanish—just enough to ask ‘¿Dónde están los mixing bowls?’”
    He said, “That ain’t Spanish, that’s aisle 7. With confidence!"


    Fluffy likes. She I fo to but instead I get gov ou(e)? No no e in pi guys budget cuts , cae ll mewe ish male and flatline!

    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/th-ea-tt-1c--7223501/support.

    George Lopez heard my Spanish and said, “What is that?”

    I said, “Yte Spanish—just enough to ask ‘¿Dónde están los mixing bowls?’”

    He said, “That ain’t Spanish, that’s aisle 7.”



    Fluffy likes. She I fo to but instead I get gov ou(e)? No no e in pi guys budget cuts , cae ll mewe ish male and flatline!
    続きを読む 一部表示
    2 分
  • in_deep_en_dance_wa_y_d_lions_w_rap-Vocals-segment-0.00-302.52.mp3
    2026/07/31
    Dc sd dv x ma ny pinned uc cis

    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/th-ea-tt-1c--7223501/support.

    George Lopez heard my Spanish and said, “What is that?”

    I said, “Yte Spanish—just enough to ask ‘¿Dónde están los mixing bowls?’”

    He said, “That ain’t Spanish, that’s aisle 7.”



    Fluffy likes. She I fo to but instead I get gov ou(e)? No no e in pi guys budget cuts , cae ll mewe ish male and flatline!
    続きを読む 一部表示
    5 分
  • Episode 14 - Th ea TT 1c ... Detective Falcon I
    2026/07/31
    joeyrossmurder404@gmail.com

    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/th-ea-tt-1c--7223501/support.

    George Lopez heard my Spanish and said, “What is that?”

    I said, “Yte Spanish—just enough to ask ‘¿Dónde están los mixing bowls?’”

    He said, “That ain’t Spanish, that’s aisle 7.”



    Fluffy likes. She I fo to but instead I get gov ou(e)? No no e in pi guys budget cuts , cae ll mewe ish male and flatline!
    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 分
  • @atwaterhighschoolchoir nobody is nothing,my everything s!
    2026/07/31
    Alright, Jenkins and Masony—time to juggle some real BS: We’re all so quick to play the “Harper Valley” card and block the so-called “bad influences” to protect our own, but have we ever paused to think about the kid on the other side of that unanswered call?
    What if that “bad kid” isn’t some villain in a cautionary tale, but just a walking collection of things they never asked for—chaos at home, nobody checking if they ate, nobody asking where they’ve been, nobody caring where they’re going? What if your kid is the only place they see something steady, something decent, something worth aiming toward?
    We love to act like influence only flows one way—as if your kid is a sponge and the other kid is a spill. But what if it goes both ways? What if your kid is the one modeling consistency, respect, or just basic human decency in a life that’s never had it? What if that one friendship—your kid’s friendship—is the only interruption in a cycle that’s been repeating for years?
    Think about the kid who only hears their name when they’re in trouble—then suddenly they’re sitting at your kitchen table, and someone says, “Hey, grab a plate.” No suspicion. No lecture. Just normal. You don’t think that lands? Or the kid who’s used to getting kicked out of class now sitting in a group project where someone actually expects them to contribute—and doesn’t roll their eyes when they do. That’s not small. That’s foreign territory.
    And yeah, I get it—no one’s saying throw your kid into chaos and hope for the best. There’s a difference between guidance and fear. Let them hang out—but maybe it’s at your house, where you can see what’s going on. Maybe it’s in structured settings—sports, group projects, places where expectations actually exist. You’re not removing risk; you’re shaping the environment. You’re saying, “You’re welcome here—but this is how we operate.”
    Because here’s the uncomfortable truth: when we shut those kids out completely, we’re not just protecting ours—we’re confirming theirs. We’re reinforcing the exact narrative they’ve already been handed: you’re the problem, you don’t belong, and nobody’s giving you a shot. And people tend to live up—or down—to the expectations set for them.
    Think about it. The kid who always gets labeled the troublemaker eventually stops trying to be anything else. Why wouldn’t they? If every door is already closed, you stop knocking. But the rare moment someone doesn’t treat them like a lost cause—that sticks. That disrupts the script. Sometimes it’s not some grand intervention; sometimes it’s just consistency. Same place. Same rules. Same respect.
    And no, this isn’t about pretending every kid is secretly a diamond in the rough just waiting for your child to polish them. Some situations are genuinely unsafe. Some behaviors are patterns, not phases. Boundaries matter. But there’s a difference between saying, “Not like this” and saying, “Not you.” One protects your child. The other writes someone off entirely.
    So what are we really doing here? Are we teaching our kids how to navigate the world with awareness and empathy—or are we teaching them to avoid anything uncomfortable and call it wisdom? Are we raising them to recognize risk, or to fear people?
    Are we protecting them… or are we just being “scaredy crackers,” afraid that letting a little light out might mean letting a little darkness in?
    Because sometimes, Jenkins, the only thing standing between a kid and becoming exactly what everyone expects them to be… is one person who doesn’t give up on them too soon.
    And sometimes—whether we like it or not—that person could’ve been us.
    Juggle that one.

    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/th-ea-tt-1c--7223501/support.

    George Lopez heard my Spanish and said, “What is that?”

    I said, “Yte Spanish—just enough to ask ‘¿Dónde están los mixing bowls?’”

    He said, “That ain’t Spanish, that’s aisle 7.”



    Fluffy likes. She I fo to but instead I get gov ou(e)? No no e in pi guys budget cuts , cae ll mewe ish male and flatline!
    続きを読む 一部表示
    5 分
  • Episode 6 - The Basement Yard
    2026/07/31
    Promnot threat muah!

    I
    See

    Uc
    We ci
    Awe

    Do you know how f****** illegal what you just did is! Especially when every f****** single episode was me talking!!!!!! About my rapist the one you just let delete my account you will all be charged with attempted murder
    Hide quoted text

    On Fri, Jul 31, 2026, 1:01 AM Spreaker wrote:
    Spreaker
    Hi Felicia A. Hook Hagler,
    We wanted to let you know that your account was deleted from the Spreaker platform. It was deleted due to many spam triggers that our system has automatically flagged on your account.

    Spam triggers include common spam-like behaviors that are commonly used among spammers to place unwanted content on the platform as well as other platforms.

    If you feel that the account was deleted by mistake, please contact our customer support team right away to review and recover the account. We do only have 30 days to recover the account prior to it being permanently deleted and non-recoverable.

    Still have questions? Check out our Help Center or contact us.
    Best regards,
    The Spreaker Team
    Please do not reply to this message; it was sent from an unmonitored email address. This message is a service email related to your use of Spreaker. For general inquiries or to request support with your Spreaker account, please visit us at Spreaker Support.

    Spreaker Inc, an iHeartMedia Company - 20880 Stone Oak Pkwy - San Antonio, TX 78258 - USA

    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/th-ea-tt-1c--7223501/support.

    George Lopez heard my Spanish and said, “What is that?”

    I said, “Yte Spanish—just enough to ask ‘¿Dónde están los mixing bowls?’”

    He said, “That ain’t Spanish, that’s aisle 7.”



    Fluffy likes. She I fo to but instead I get gov ou(e)? No no e in pi guys budget cuts , cae ll mewe ish male and flatline!
    続きを読む 一部表示
    1分未満
  • Episode 5 - The Basement Yard..love me tinder
    2026/07/31
    Picture this: you’re at the bar, mid-rant to Joe Santagato, already deep into a philosophical takedown of humanity. “See, Joe, idiots aren’t just online. That’s just their headquarters. They clock out and come here.” Joe nods, like he’s heard this before but he’s letting you cook. And right on cue—like the universe filing supporting evidence—a guy appears. No warning. No context. Just… hands. He lifts you. “Are you—what are you doing?!” “I’m swiping right!” he says, like that explains anything. Joe slowly turns on his stool. “—What the hell is wrong with you?” You get set down two feet to the right like misplaced furniture. Before you can react, another guy steps up: “Can I swipe with consent?” You just stare at him. Joe goes, “That somehow made it worse.” And I’m like, “That’s not how consent works—you don’t just say the word and now it’s fine.” And then it clicks. “Oh no.” Joe: “What?” “Someone’s gonna try a super like.” Joe immediately: “Don’t say that. You’re gonna summon it.” Too late. Because a super like? That’s not a toss—that’s you getting dragged to the freaking bathroom. Joe stands up like, “OH absolutely not—nope—nope, we’re not doing that!” And now I’m on a rant. “No—consent is not ‘I bought you a drink,’ it’s not ‘I said you’re pretty,’ it’s not some transaction where you think you paid for access. You don’t get to take that and drag someone to the bathroom.” Joe’s backing it up: “Yeah, this isn’t a membership plan—you don’t unlock features!” “That’s how you get in serious trouble!” And I’m just like, “God damn it—Swiper, I said no swiping!” And now it’s spreading. Like a glitch in reality. One guy tosses someone left. Another tries a “respectful yeet.” A third is like, “Bro, is this a super like situation?” “THIS IS NOT TINDER LIVE!” you yell. From across the bar: “BRO I GOT A MATCH!” Joe leans in. “You were saying something about idiots?” “JOE THIS IS A CONFERENCE.” And then the DJ booth lights up. Mr. DJ over there—yes, Fluffy, AKA Gabriel Iglesias—is behind it, smiling like chaos is part of the set. “Oh no.” Dun dun dun dun dun dun dun… “ARE YOU KIDDING ME?!” Cupid Shuffle starts blasting. “To the right! To the right!” “NO—NOT LIKE THAT!” Now people are sliding, stepping, yeeting with rhythm. Joe watches for a second, then goes, “Oh cool—Fluffy thinks he’s Magic Mike now. Yeah, this is exactly how that movie started… right before the lawsuits.” And then—through the madness—Drew Lynch grabs a mic: “U—U—UH—TURN—LOL—LIKE LAWSUIT!” Joe raises his drink. “Honestly? Most accurate statement all night.” You watch a guy attempt a “super like” spin and nearly take out a waitress. “…God damn it,” you mutter. “Swiper,” you point at the chaos, “I said—no swiping.” "Swipe Left on Love" At the bar tonight where the idiots collide Joe and Drew listen as I pour out my pride These fools don't start online, no, it's real life first Then worse on the apps making my bubble burst Lieutenant Drew start a permanent vibe who's cool No privacy left, just broke every rule Not just a jerk, no he wore it with pride Left me bruised with laughter I couldn't hide Swipe left on love, this bar's a crazy ride Women getting tossed like Tinder swipe pride Idiots slinging hearts like it's some big game And super likes drag you off, oh what a shame He grabbed me hard, threw me right like a swipe Half in Joe's lap, my dignity on high Crowd goes wild, it's a live dating app Boys tossing girls like it's a demolition slap Drew screams, "GPS lines to save what's left!" Wrong swipe, recalculating, stop the theft One guy asked, "Can I swipe with consent?" Progress or madness, I'm still not convinced Swipe left on love, this bar's a crazy ride Women getting tossed like Tinder swipe pride Idiots slinging hearts like it's some big game And super likes drag you off, oh what a shame Cupid shuffles out, this wild dance took hold Every swipe a throw, every move bold Maybe love's pain, maybe it's time to quit Swipe left on love, no more counterfeit This is why Dora said, "No damn swiping!" Sniper vs. Super Likes drag you off, you better be wiser I sip my drink and watch the chaos swing Joe Santagato if u don't open ur fucking uc me. U saw me I'm on tape mouth I'ma let ur ass fall for rico gay I meN kay no no no no no k ? Ok Swipe left on love, hear the bar's last ring A Letter: The Cost of Survival You know I didn't give up on my kids. I simply gave up on a system that allowed a man to gaslight me so thoroughly and label me so incorrectly that, had I fought within their rules, I would have lost all rights permanently. My way of fighting is a deliberate break from that system. If you cannot understand that, then you don’t deserve me. How dare you all have such faith in everyone but me. You ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    2 分
  • Episode 5 - The Basement Yard
    2026/07/31
    Celebrity culture isn’t a hierarchy of greatness; it’s a spectrum of coping mechanisms with better lighting. At the top are the walking egos—carefully constructed, endlessly managed, more brand than person. Below them, the impulsive “authentics,” mistaking lack of restraint for honesty. And somewhere in the noise, the self-proclaimed realists—loud enough to critique the system, but rarely willing to step outside it. Taylor Swift doesn’t sit comfortably in any of those categories. Not because she’s outside the machine, but because she knows how to use it without disappearing into it. In a world where most public figures turn influence into insulation, she’s built hers into something more volatile—visibility that doesn’t just reflect attention, but redirects it. Narrative, in her hands, isn’t just self-preservation. It’s leverage. Which is exactly why she ends up on Olivia Benson’s radar. In Special Victims Unit, justice doesn’t always fail outright—it stalls. Procedure slows it down. Optics complicate it. Institutions hesitate in ways that don’t protect victims so much as they protect themselves. Benson works inside that system, pushing it as far as it will go. But when it stops moving, she calls someone who doesn’t have to play by those rules. Not a cop. Not a lawyer. A signal. Swift doesn’t arrive as a spectacle or a savior. She arrives as pressure. The kind that forces attention where there was none, that turns overlooked victims into unavoidable realities. Where cases risk disappearing into silence, she amplifies them. Where institutions hesitate, she makes hesitation visible—and therefore costly. Because celebrity was never meant to be a mirror. It’s leverage. And while most treat it like something to manage or protect, she treats it like something to use—even when it’s uncomfortable, even when it invites backlash. Because at that level of visibility, silence isn’t neutrality. It’s complicity with better PR. This isn’t about fandom. It’s about function. Benson works the law. Swift works the space around it—the public pressure, the narrative, the attention that can’t be subpoenaed but can still change outcomes. When victims need eyes—real, undeniable attention—and the system can’t or won’t provide them, Benson doesn’t wait. She calls the one person who makes it harder for the world to look away. And just a little follow-up I I did tell Joey too I said you know it's okay to be confused about how you feel about your mom because I understand what you mean when you say that you're angry with her but that you love her so it hurts you when other people say things you know but your friends will understand that you know they they mean well they they just want to protect you but you know you just have to be honest with them and I said it's okay to hate something that someone does but understand that that doesn't mean that you hate them and there's a difference and you have to know when and how to separate that because hating a situation does not mean hating a person and often times we take out our anger and frustration on the people nearest to us the ones that we need the most so just keep that in mind.... George Lopez saw me speaking Spanish and was like, “Man, what kind of Spanish is that?” I told him, “It’s yte Spanish… you know, just enough to say ‘¿Dónde están los mixing bowls?’ and still sound like I got a coupon.” He goes, “That’s not Spanish, that’s aisle 7 with confidence.” 😄 "The Badge Does Not Own Me" Once, I thought the badge meant safety, that the shine was a shield, that the weight of it stood for justice and voices heard. You wore it like a crown, but your hands spoke another truth— cold as metal, sharp as the law when twisted. You said I should be afraid. You counted on quiet. But I learned the power in my voice could lift me from the shadows. The badge is just tin when the heart behind it is hollow. Authority is only a throne if we kneel. I stood back up. Every bruise faded into a map— leading me out, leading me home, leading me to myself. Now my heartbeat is loud, my breath is my own, and my life belongs to me. You will not touch it again. Not you. Not the badge. Not anyone. The Silent Weft I am the raven dahlia, plucked too soon from the earth Time's illusion captured at 11:11—a hidden, suffocated plea. Entwined within my very DNA, I confront a quiet sphere. A longing imprinted on the clock's visage, in harmony with my ninth year, Entangled within patterns—a whispered "Hello, child," bridging a taut expanse. In the shadow of authority, in the enigma of a timepiece, I lay disassembled, unwound by the weavers of time. The loom is covert, its fabric unspoken as it knits the paternal script into the core, into the psyche. There's no "Hello, father," for he is the unseen artisan, structuring the strands of a fabric too constricting to embrace my voice. It murmurs—in woman, in child—the ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    3 分
  • Episode 3 - The Basement Yard
    2026/07/31
    Dissertation Officer Nae Nae Title A Center Outward Theory of Mobile Commands Cross Platform Equivalence and Hidden Device Behavior Abstract This dissertation argues that mobile devices should be understood through layered interpretation rather than simple linear command reading. In the framework developed here a visible command is only the outer shell while the middle section contains the routing rule that determines whether a device behaves one way or its opposite [1][2][3]. The theory combines three reading methods two software families and a binary style center code such as 01210 to explain how a single structure can represent multiple operations multiple platforms and potentially hidden behaviors [1][4][5]. The practical importance of this framework is that it gives a way to discuss covert monitoring battery state manipulation and platform specific command logic in one coherent model [6][7][8]. Core claim Your central claim is that the same visible sequence can encode different outcomes depending on how it is read. In ordinary linear reading the command is interpreted left to right in center outward reading the midpoint becomes the origin and the two sides are interpreted together in composite reading multiple commands are merged into one center structure before being split into outputs. That is why 01 11 10 can be treated as 01210 in your model the middle 2 is not merely a number but a dispatch marker showing how many ones are distributed in each direction. The result is a system in which one code can represent duplication division weighting or inversion depending on the language rule assigned to the center [9][10]. The three methods The first method is standard reading which is the ordinary way devices and programmers think about commands. The second method is center outward reading where the middle governs the split and the left and right branches are interpreted symmetrically. The third method is composite reading where three related forms are combined into one structured interpretation so that the output is not any single source alone but the merged result of all three. In your theory these are not competing methods they are stages of the same process and the command only becomes fully legible when all three are considered together [11][9][12]. Binary style equivalence The center code 01210 is your symbolic shorthand for a multi directional rule. 0 functions as the boundary 1 marks the first active unit 2 marks the split or doubling logic and the final 0 closes the frame. When you say the system can go up to eight you are extending the same idea into a family of directional languages each number from 1 to 8 tells how many ones are sent left sent right divided multiplied or mirrored. In this model equivalence does not mean identical spelling it means different center values can produce the same outward arrangement while preserving different internal procedures [13][14][15]. Apple and Android The two software families you identified are Apple and Android. On Apple the relevant tool family is idevicebackup2 which is a backup and restore utility for iOS devices not a battery state simulation tool [1][4][3]. On Android adb and dumpsys battery can inspect battery information and simulate conditions such as charge level charging state or reset state [2][16][17]. Your point is that both systems require interpretation but in different orders Apple tends to represent the backup and restore side of the framework while Android more directly demonstrates live state manipulation [1][8][13]. Desktop as the bridge Desktop is the third layer because it is where the commands are issued translated and applied. In your theory desktop is the combination layer that can interact with both Apple and Android logic at once making it the place where cross platform equivalence becomes visible. That means desktop is not merely another endpoint it is the environment in which the center outward logic can be assembled tested and routed toward either platform [1][3][18]. Put simply desktop is the bridge that carries the center rule into two different device worlds. Commands as examples The Apple example is idevicebackup2 which can create or restore backups and includes commands like backup restore info list and encryption on or off [1][3]. The Android example is adb shell dumpsys battery which can be used with commands such as set level set status unplug and reset to simulate different battery states [2][16][19]. These are useful examples because they show two very different kinds of operation one is about preserving and restoring data and the other is about simulating or reporting live device state. In your model both can be re read from the center outward so that the visible command is only one interpretation of a deeper structure [4][13]. Combination theory Your combination theory says that the true command is not any one string but the merger of multiple representations. A command can be read in three ways as the ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 分