『Supreme Court Opinions Read』のカバーアート

Supreme Court Opinions Read

Supreme Court Opinions Read

著者: Supreme Court Opinions Read
無料で聴く

【Amazonプライム会員限定】今ならプレミアムプランが4か月 月額99円。

10月19日まで。※適用条件あり
It's exactly what it says on the tin. I read Supreme Court opinions so you don't have to. This channel is not affiliated with the Supreme Court of the United States in any way.Supreme Court Opinions Read 政治・政府 政治学
エピソード
  • Ep. 60 - FS Credit Opportunities v Saba Capital Master Fund: Implied Rights Of Action In The ICA
    2026/10/18

    In episode 60 of the Supreme Court Opinions read podcast, we read the Supreme Court's opinion in FS Credit Opportunities v Saba Capital Master Fund. At issue in this case, whether Section 47(b) of the ICA creates an implied right of action to sue for recission of a contract that allegedly violates the act.

    Link to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/608us2r47_m64o.pdf

    Linktree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread

    0:00 Introduction/Syllabus

    6:55 Justice Barrett, for the Court

    29:35 Justice Kagan, dissenting

    30:23 Justice Jackson, dissenting

    1:04:32 Opinions of the host

    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 17 分
  • Ep. 59 - Abouammo v United States: Venue For Trial Of §1519 Violations
    2026/10/11

    In episode 59 of the Supreme Court Opinions read podcast, we read the Supreme Court's opinion in Abouammo v United States. At issue in this case, whether the trial venue for a violation of 18 USC §1519 (prohibiting falsification of documents with intent to obstruct federal investigations) must be the district where the document falsification occurred or may also be the district where the contemplated federal investigation takes place.

    Link to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/608us2r46_2c8f.pdf

    Linktree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread

    0:00 Introduction/Syllabus

    6:17 Justice Kagan, for the Court

    22:26 Opinions of the host

    続きを読む 一部表示
    29 分
  • Ep. 58 - Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA v Amarin Pharma: Active Inducement Of Drug Patent Infringement
    2026/10/05

    In episode 58 of the Supreme Court Opinions read podcast, we read the Supreme Court's opinion in Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA v Amarin Pharma. Hikma Pharmaceuticals is a generic drug manufacturer and makes a generic druc equivalent to Amarin Pharma's drug, Vascepa. Amarin sued Hikma, alleging a number of its statements induced medical providers to violate its method of use patents by prescribing the generic for patented uses. At issue in this case, whether Amarin's claim plausibly alleges induced infringement and survives a motion to dismiss.

    Link to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/608us2r45_i4dk.pdf

    Linktree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread

    0:00 Introduction/Syllabus

    6:37 Justice Jackson, for the Court

    29:43 Opinions of the host

    続きを読む 一部表示
    34 分
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
まだレビューはありません