Six Hundred Million Dollars, One Verdict, and No Answers: The Civil Trial
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
ご購入は五十タイトルがカートに入っている場合のみです。
カートに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
Six Hundred Million Dollars, One Verdict, and No Answers: The Civil Trial
-
ナレーター：
-
著者：
(00:01:09) What the Lawsuit Was Actually Claiming
(00:02:35) The FLIR Footage
(00:04:06) Witness Testimony and the Narrowing of Scope
(00:05:16) The Jury and What It Never Explained
(00:06:26) Bill Johnston and the Accountability Question
(00:07:46) What the Legal Framework Couldn't Capture
(00:09:33) The Longer Consequence
(00:11:05) Where This Leaves Us
Six years after the fire at Mount Carmel, survivors and families of the Branch Davidians brought a $675 million lawsuit against the United States government. It was supposed to be the moment the legal system delivered what congressional hearings and competing investigations never could: sworn testimony, examined evidence, and a formal reckoning with what happened on April 19, 1993. Instead, the 1999 civil trial became one of the most frustrating chapters in the entire Waco story — not for what it found, but for what it never allowed the jury to fully consider.
This episode dissects the trial presided over by Judge Walter Smith — the evidentiary rulings that constrained the FLIR footage and its most explosive implications, the limits placed on survivor testimony, and the legal architecture of sovereign immunity that shaped every decision about what the jury was permitted to weigh. The plaintiffs argued excessive force, negligence in the tear gas assault, and possible government contribution to the fire itself. The jury absolved the federal government on every major count.
Was Judge Smith applying legitimate judicial restraint within a genuinely narrow legal framework? Or did his rulings systematically shield the government from accountability? We examine both positions honestly — and sit with the fact that a five-person jury deliberated seriously, sent pointed questions to the judge, and then returned a verdict that explained nothing.
For anyone still asking why Waco refuses to close, the civil trial is the missing piece. This is the chapter that shows why official proceedings can produce official silence.
This episode includes AI-generated content.
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
まだレビューはありません