Sinner, Alcaraz and What Defines the Best Player in Tennis
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
Sinner, Alcaraz and What Defines the Best Player in Tennis
-
ナレーター：
-
著者：
Jannik Sinner's season-ending injury gives us a reason to step back and evaluate what he's actually become. Is Sinner now the best pure tennis player of his generation? Torrey argues that, stroke for stroke, his court positioning, serve, return and baseline game may already give him the edge over Carlos Alcaraz. Alvin agrees that Sinner has the cleaner toolkit—but Alcaraz still possesses something harder to quantify: the ability to find another level when a match becomes unpredictable.
From there, the conversation expands into the ATP hierarchy. We discuss what Sinner's absence means for Alexander Zverev, why Novak Djokovic's current limitation isn't really his tennis, and why having Novak around still matters for the players trying to replace him.
An unexpected conversation about Felix Auger-Aliassime and Ivan Ljubičić then turns into one of our deeper coaching discussions: great players don't simply collect skills—they eventually have to decide what their tennis is designed to do. We finish with Carlos Alcaraz's return to form and why the remarkable run of men's tennis in 2025 may look even better with time.
Send us Fan Mail