Got something to say to this podcast? Send a voicemail, and you might hear yourself on the next episode!

**Can the Noam Elimelech contradict himself—or is there a coherent theological system beneath his teachings?** **שבילי החסידות | Parallel Seminar | שיעור 1** **נועם אלימלך – פרשת בראשית** ג׳ מדרגות: סתירה או שיטה? In the opening session of our Parallel Seminar, we begin a systematic study of the Noam Elimelech by examining the sefer itself, rather than imposing an external philosophical framework. We begin with the three מדרגות introduced at the opening of פרשת בראשית: תורה • עבודה • גמילות חסדים What initially appears to be a familiar division of religious activities becomes a much deeper investigation into תורה לשמה ושלא לשמה, עבודת הלב, the struggle for דבקות, העלאת הניצוצות, and the extraordinary condition of the צדיק who remains physically in this world while connected to חיים נצחיים. But then we encounter a striking difficulty. When the Noam Elimelech explains תורה צוה לנו משה מורשה קהילת יעקב, he appears to rearrange the very מדרגות he just established. Does he contradict himself? Are there actually four מדרגות rather than three? Or have we misunderstood what a מדרגה means? Through close textual analysis, audience discussion, and comparisons with other teachings in the sefer, we begin developing a distinction between the inward condition of the עובד ה׳ and the outward effect of his עבודה—and between spiritual effort and a qualitatively transformed mode of דבקות. This is the first installment of an ongoing seminar investigating whether the Noam Elimelech presents a coherent and sustained theological vision. https://rss.com/podcasts/shvilei-hachassidus/ https://chat.whatsapp.com/BpT817doRD54yGN5DBdN46 ### Chapters / Bookmarks 00:00 — Introduction: Does the Noam Elimelech have a coherent שיטה? 02:51 — The three things for which the world was created 08:45 — The initial three מדרגות: What are we actually studying? 11:24 — מדרגה ראשונה: תורה לשמה ושלא לשמה 13:36 — Why reaching לשמה requires עבודה במדות 20:13 — Torah as an עבודה that transforms the learner 29:40 — מדרגה שניה: תפילה ועבודה שבלב 33:04 — Outward behavior versus the struggle of מחשבה 37:38 — תפילה, קשר, and the battle for דבקות 43:45 — The Wi-Fi analogy: Reconnecting versus being connected 47:47 — מדרגה שלישית: גמילות חסדים, חסד ורחמים 49:54 — העלאת הניצוצות and the work of the צדיק 54:54 — Cross-reference: Sanctifying physical activity 58:56 — Is the third מדרגה merely a higher degree—or a different mode of existence? 1:04:04 — תורה צוה לנו משה: The three מדרגות appear again 1:07:43 — The apparent contradiction: Three מדרגות or four? 1:12:15 — דביקות גמור and חיים נצחיים: A different plane of existence 1:16:39 — מורשה: העלאת הניצוצות as an entrusted עבודה 1:23:22 — Further evidence: עבודה and spiritual attainment 1:25:28 — Toward a resolution: The inward and outward dimensions of עבודה 1:30:07 — Testing the interpretation through additional textual comparisons ### About the Series שבילי החסידות – Shvilei HaChassidus The Parallel Seminar is a companion series devoted to close reading of foundational Chassidic texts, investigating their conceptual structure, theological arguments, and internal coherence. The goal is not merely to extract inspirational teachings, but to understand the intellectual and spiritual vision developed within the sefarim themselves. #נועם_אלימלך #חסידות #ShvileiHaChassidus

Got something to say to this podcast? Send a voicemail, and you might hear yourself on the next episode!

When a wise person reaches the wrong conclusion, what exactly has gone wrong?

It is tempting to say simply: the judge made a mistake. But that already hides a much harder question. Was the error in the facts supplied to judgment? In the decision to rely on those facts? In the way the particular situation was perceived? Or in the deliberation about what those circumstances required?

Seminar 14 continues the Phronēsis Dilemma by returning to the conceptual maps developed in Seminar 13 and applying them to the sugya of Yevamot 92a.

The Gemara distinguishes between הוראה and טעות. Through the explanation of Rabbeinu Avraham min haHar, the issue becomes especially sharp: when Beis Din acts on a single witness, is the resulting determination carried by Beis Din’s own סברא, or is Beis Din ultimately relying upon the testimony itself? The contrast with the case of חלב forces us to distinguish institutional involvement from genuine reason-governed judicial determination.

That distinction then returns us directly to Aristotle.

In Nicomachean Ethics VI.8, Aristotle distinguishes error concerning the particular from error in deliberation—and describes the ultimate practical particular through a kind of perception. But where exactly does perception end and phronetic deliberation begin?

The seminar therefore asks:

What counts as a genuine token exercise of phronēsis?

Can a phronimos be factually mistaken without phronēsis itself failing?

When does accepting evidence become part of practical judgment?

Is seeing a circumstance as “urgent,” “available,” or “adequate” perception or deliberation?

Can a correct conclusion result from defective reasoning?

What would actually count as a counterexample to phronetic infallibility?

How do the truth-bearer, truth-ground, finite access, and practical-agency maps from Seminar 13 help us locate the error?

The seminar also draws selectively on the halakhic categories of אונס, שגגה, הוראה, and reliance under uncertainty to show why a later bad outcome does not by itself tell us which cognitive capacity failed.

The central question becomes:

Before asking whether phronēsis can fail, we first have to know what counts as an exercise of phronēsis.

This seminar is part of the continuing Shvilei HaChassidus / Phronēsis Dilemma series.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1F6Hddumird90No2QzIYrKZhHOyTFGkZz/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=103649656007204612504&rtpof=true&sd=true

https://rss.com/podcasts/shvilei-hachassidus/

https://chat.whatsapp.com/BpT817doRD54yGN5DBdN46

The charts referenced throughout the seminar can be accessed at the following link:

Got something to say to this podcast? Send a voicemail, and you might hear yourself on the next episode!

Can the Noam Elimelech contradict himself? And if not, how can we know which of his teachings applies to us? In Parshas Noach, the Noam Elimelech teaches that a tzaddik must constantly engage in teshuvah. Yet elsewhere, he describes a צדיק גמור who is entirely free of spiritual impurity. Are these teachings contradictory? Or are they describing different spiritual levels? And if the answer is simply that each teaching concerns a different מדרגה, a more difficult question emerges: How do we know which level each teaching describes—and which teaching is meant for us? In the opening session of our new Parallel Seminar series, we examine a fundamental question in studying Chassidus: Are Chassidic teachings coherent claims about spiritual reality, or are they primarily inspirational and emotional exhortations? Through the Noam Elimelech, two humorous illustrations, and Rambam's comparison of moral education to medicine, we explore: - What actually constitutes a contradiction? - Can two seemingly opposite teachings both be correct? - What role do spiritual levels, context, and the intended audience play? - Why doesn't resolving a textual contradiction automatically tell us how to apply the teaching? - Can a spiritually true and elevated teaching nevertheless be the wrong guidance for a particular individual? The discussion introduces a larger inquiry that we will continue through the teachings of Komarno and Tanya: **How can enduring Torah speak meaningfully to different individuals, at different stages, in different circumstances?** Shvilei HaChassidus | שבילי החסידות Parallel Seminar — Session 1 https://rss.com/podcasts/shvilei-hachassidus/ https://chat.whatsapp.com/BpT817doRD54yGN5DBdN46 00:00 Introduction — What Is the Parallel Seminar? 03:25 The Noam Elimelech: Two Kinds of Tzaddik? 09:48 Does a Perfect Tzaddik Need Teshuvah? 18:56 “A Gut Shabbos — How Do You Know?”: What Kind of Statement Is This? 23:57 The Hidden Premise Behind the Contradiction 26:39 “For You? Less.” — Opposite Advice, One Coherent Principle 31:31 Rambam: Why the Right Medicine Can Harm the Wrong Person 37:45 Two Different Errors: Misunderstanding vs. Misapplication 39:53 Komarno: Can a Sefer of Avodah Be Written for Every Reader? 46:19 Why Does Grounding the Sefer in Pirkei Avos Help? 51:48 Tanya: Can a Written Sefer Replace Personal Guidance? 59:53 Conclusion — Knowing the System vs. Knowing Where You Stand #Chassidus #NoamElimelech #JewishThought