『Shadow Politics with US Senator Michael D Brown』のカバーアート

Shadow Politics with US Senator Michael D Brown

Shadow Politics with US Senator Michael D Brown

著者： Senator Michael D. Brown
無料で聴く

Shadow Politics is a grass roots talk show giving a voice to the voiceless. For more than 200 years the people of the Nation's Capital have ironically been excluded from the national political conversation. With no voting member of either house of Congress, Washingtonians have lacked the representation they need to be equal and to have their voices heard. Shadow Politics will provide a platform for them, as well as the millions of others nationwide who feel politically disenfranchised and disconnected, to be included in a national dialog. We need to start a new conversation in America, one that is more inclusive and diverse and one that will lead our great nation forward to meet the challenges of the 21st century. At Shadow Politics, we hope to get this conversation started by bringing Americans together to talk about issues important to them. We look forward to having you be part of the discussion so call in and join the conversation. America is calling and we're listening… Shadow Politics is about America hearing what you have to say. It's your chance to talk to an elected official who has spent more than 30 years in Washington politics. We believe that if we start a dialog and others add their voices we will create a chorus. Even if those other politicians in Washington don't hear you — Senator Brown will. He's on a mission to listen to what America has to say and use it to start a productive dialog to make our democracy stronger and more inclusive. If we are all part of the solution we can solve any problem.Copyright 2026 Senator Michael Brown 政治・政府 政治学
エピソード
  • Shadow Politics, October 25, 2026

    Shadow Politics, October 25, 2026
    2026/10/26
    Shadow Politics with US Senator Michael D Brown GET OUT AND VOTE: Vote for India May! India May's Campaign for Iowa House District 58 | May for Iowa A Vote is a Terrible Thing to Waste! https://mayforiowa.com/ https://www.facebook.com/groups/1590426035411235/ https://www.instagram.com/mayforiowa https://www.youtube.com/@MayforIowa https://bsky.app/profile/mayforiowa.bsky.social Rural Health Care, Poisoned Water, and a Fight to Rebuild Trust in Politics with India May India May, a nurse, county library director, and county death investigator running for Iowa's District 58 seat, joins Senator Michael D. Brown and co-host Liberty Jones to talk about contaminated rural drinking water, a broken health care system, her opponent's finances, and what it takes to rebuild trust in politics. A Nurse Takes On Iowa Politics Senator Michael D. Brown opens Shadow Politics by welcoming India May, a first-time candidate for Iowa's District 58 seat, describing her as a registered nurse, county library director, and county death investigator who has personally knocked more than seven thousand doors alongside volunteers. May explains that in her district she has witnessed preventable deaths, cancer in people far younger than it should appear, and suicides among veterans and farmers, which pushed her toward public office. She tells Brown and co-host Liberty Jones that Medicaid, Medicare, and private insurance keep shrinking in coverage even as premiums, deductibles, and medication costs climb, while insurance company profits and executive bonuses rise every year. Brown notes that nurses are consistently ranked the most trusted profession in national surveys, calling it proof that May is running for the right reasons. May says one nurse explaining how healthcare actually works on the ground could help fix broken systems that politicians rarely understand firsthand. Poisoned Water And Preventable Disease Liberty Jones raises May's work connecting clean drinking water to cancer prevention, especially given new AI data centers. May responds that research already proves Iowa's water carries carcinogens well beyond nitrates and agricultural runoff, naming atrazine, glyphosate, paraquat, and PFAS forever chemicals as endocrine disruptors that affect every organ system, driving up autoimmune conditions like Parkinson's alongside cancer. She says Des Moines receives state-of-the-art filtration while rural Iowans drink the same contaminated water without it, calling it cruel to poison communities and then defund the healthcare that treats the resulting illness. May argues the problem extends across the Midwest and requires real regulation of corporate polluters rather than token penalties, along with a rewritten farm bill. Brown recalls covering the original farm legislation in college and agrees it is overdue for an overhaul, setting up a broader conversation about what rural communities actually need from Washington. An Opponent's Debt And Refused Debates Brown asks whether money is a problem against her entrenched opponent, incumbent Charlie Thomson, chair of the Iowa House oversight committee. May says Thomson has gone deeply into campaign debt to himself over the years, a legal but, she argues, unethical practice she has documented publicly, and that he has not received a district donation in over a year, relying instead on political action committees and wealthy donors from Des Moines and Chicago. She expects to be outspent but says he cannot outwork her, pointing to Republican yards now carrying her signs. May adds that Thomson has refused every debate and candidate forum, first citing his financial history and then accusing her of antisemitism for opposing what she calls the genocide in Gaza, a charge she rejects as absurd. Brown praises her authenticity, recalling her viral moment confronting Senator Joni Ernst on camera as evidence of the unscripted honesty he says Washington badly lacks. Reforming A Party That Talks Down Liberty Jones asks what legitimate criticism May has of her own party, and May says she spent her adult life as an independent until deciding Democrats need young, working-class voices the way MAGA reshaped the Republican Party. She criticizes a style of politics her mother calls noblesse oblige that offers half measures instead of asking people what they actually need, and says Democrats must stop enabling foreign conflicts funded by American tax dollars while domestic healthcare goes unmet. Brown agrees that lecturing voters, especially on guns, is the party's Achilles' heel. May recounts an Associated Press reporter's door-knocking question, has the Democratic Party neglected you, which left lifelong Trump voters in her district speechless, and says both parties take support without reciprocating. She argues rural Iowa was neglected by Democrats and that rebuilding trust means proving, door by door, that a vote will actually be returned with action rather than demands for money, loyalty, and yard signs...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    58 分
  • Shadow Politics, October 18, 2026

    Shadow Politics, October 18, 2026
    2026/10/19
    Shadow Politics with US Senator Michael D Brown Iran War Missteps, Depleted Military Stockpiles, and a Case for Negotiation with Admiral Joe Sestak Admiral Joe Sestak joins Senator Michael D. Brown to dissect the Iran war's shifting goals, its toll on military readiness and sailors, and the politics of fear in Washington, closing with a case for negotiation over endless conflict. A Senator Welcomes a Returning Admiral Senator Michael D. Brown opens Shadow Politics by welcoming listeners and explaining that his co-host, Liberty Jones, is away on assignment. He introduces Admiral Joe Sestak, describing him as a former United States congressman, Democratic presidential candidate, and admiral who once commanded a fleet in the Middle East, and thanks him warmly for his service. Brown asks directly why America went to war with Iran, noting that the Straits of Hormuz were open, oil was still flowing, and Iran had no nuclear weapon. Sestak calls the conflict a tragic misadventure, explaining that the President wanted a better deal than the existing nuclear accord, which had kept enriched material out of Iran under round-the-clock surveillance and which Iran had never violated. Sestak says the stated goals kept shifting, from removing nuclear capability to toppling the regime, violating the military maxim that armed force can stop a problem but never fix it, and he warns that any use of the military requires knowing the endgame before it begins. Iran's Vast Geography and Military Risks Senator Brown presses further, relaying claims from Trump supporters that ground troops could finish the job, and asks whether America has forgotten the lessons of Vietnam and the Soviet Union in Afghanistan given Iran's size of ninety-two million people across six hundred thirty-seven thousand square miles. Sestak replies that Iran is four times larger than Iraq and that its Revolutionary Guard is deliberately dispersed with its own generators, making the whole population effectively under its control rather than a single army to defeat. Brown turns to the sailors deployed nearly a year on one aircraft carrier, and Sestak describes five thousand crew with an average age of nineteen and a half living on what amounts to a floating city they cannot leave. He explains that losing the logistics hub in Bahrain forced supplies to route through the Indian Ocean, leaving food scarce at times, and that American minesweepers were rated ready only thirty percent of the time against Iran's five thousand mines. Depleted Stockpiles and China's Chokehold Sestak warns that the war has damaged broader national security, noting that a single six-hundred-drone-and-missile salvo from Iran consumed four years of Patriot missile production, which will not be replenished until 2033 even as Tomahawk output scrambles from sixty a year toward one thousand. He explains that China has used American tariffs as leverage, tightening its monopoly on heavy rare-earth metals like samarium that these missiles require, crippling production of vital systems even as the National Security Strategy names China the top military competitor. Sestak recalls that Lockheed Martin halted Tomahawk production last year until Belgium and France shared old stockpiles of the material, contrasting that isolation with Afghanistan, where fifty-two countries sent combat forces and eighty provided logistical support. He adds that the Middle East is now splintered, with the Houthis striking the Bab-el-Mandeb strait and threatening to close it much as Iran threatened the Straits of Hormuz, a narrower chokepoint he has personally passed through. Saudi Arabia, Israel, and Nuclear Risk Brown asks about America's balancing act between Saudi Arabia and Israel, and Sestak says he opposes current plans to help Saudi Arabia build a nuclear reactor, recalling that a U.S. resident journalist was dismembered in Turkey at the instigation of its leader, MBS, and that its oil pipeline has repeatedly been struck despite American-sold defenses. Sestak adds that declaring Israel over the top without consequence, as President Biden once did, weakens America's standing to criticize China's treatment of Uyghur Muslims. Brown raises rumors of a nuclear strike and asks who stops a president from ordering one; Sestak answers that the decision rests with one person alone, recalling a NATO nuclear wargame under Admiral Crowe where sixteen chiefs of defense and an acting President Baker reached a simulated nuclear decision so tense that Crowe ordered Sestak out of the room. Sestak says trust, not firepower, is America's biggest deficit, pointing to Iraq, where removing Saddam Hussein freed Iran from a check that had kept it from causing mischief across the region. A Secretary of War Under Fire Brown turns to the Secretary of War, calling him unqualified for mocking generals' weight and Marines' toughness, and asks whether this undermines morale. Sestak agrees, noting the Secretary addressed generals and admirals ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    42 分
  • Shadow Politics, October 4, 2026

    Shadow Politics, October 4, 2026
    2026/10/05
    Shadow Politics with US Senator Michael D Brown Brazil's Primary Vote, Martial Law Fears, and the Politics of Fear Michael D. Brown and co-host Liberty Jones use Liberty's Brazilian primary vote as a starting point to discuss misinformation about Sharia law and socialism, partisan division, fear-based politics, and the midterms. Sharia Law, Socialism Fears, and a Call to Calm Michael D. Brown opens the broadcast by welcoming listeners to Shadow Politics and introducing his co-host, Liberty Jones, whom he calls his favorite person in the whole wide world. He turns first to misinformation he sees on Instagram and Twitter, where a post asks whether President Trump wants to ban Sharia law. Brown explains that Sharia is a religious code rather than American law, that it cannot be banned under religious freedom, and that the claims are meant to frighten people about Muslims, who make up less than three percent of the population. He then addresses warnings about communists and democratic socialists. Brown reminds listeners that Social Security, Medicare, public schools, and the fire department are already socialist ideas, and he says democratic socialists simply believe government should work for the people. Brown asks Jones to move on, and she responds that both sides use fear to push misinformation during the midterms. Division Past and Present, from Jackson to the Internet Jones asks whether American politics has always been this dysfunctional or is simply more visible now, and Brown answers that both are true. He recalls Andrew Jackson's wife, who was hounded by the press over a brief, unconsummated arranged marriage and died the day before he was inaugurated, a story he uses to show that nastiness in politics has always existed. Brown says the 1960s were just as divided, with assassinations, a never-ending war in Vietnam, and a divided decade he lived through as a hippie. He argues that the internet is what feels new, because anyone can find thousands of people who agree with them. Brown adds that in the past, Americans had to do research to learn anything, while today a twenty-four-hour news cycle spans fifteen outlets with different prejudices. Brown concludes that the internet has made the situation more toxic than it has ever been before. He says he is an old guy, stuck in his ways, and that Jones's view as someone younger matters more than his. Brazil's Primary Vote, Television, and Who Profits Jones reports that she voted earlier that day in Brazil's primary elections, which Brazilian citizens living in the United States may join for the presidency. She names the top two options as Flávio Bolsonaro, the son of the former president, and the current president, Lula, whom she calls the leftist option. Jones describes Bolsonaro as a former military man who was found guilty of trying to incite a militaristic dictatorship and imprisoned, and she says President Trump defended him and helped him get out of prison. She describes Lula as the leftist choice she is leaning toward for his environmental laws, recalls the car wash corruption scandal, and says she voted for a third candidate, Ronaldo Caiado, to defend her people. The conversation then turns to television, with Brown recalling that the 1950s brought four channels that signed off at midnight and a single set in most homes. Jones ties that to today's phones and asks whether division grows from real disagreement or because institutions profit from it. Martial Law Fears and the Question of Who Decides Brown argues that both parties exploit fear, and he jokes that some liberals are "liberals against going along," just as rigid as the MAGA side. He also says most people did not pass through Ellis Island, pointing to his grandfather, who lived here ten years before becoming a citizen. Brown's biggest concern is that Republicans are trying to rig the midterms and may place ICE agents and National Guard at polling places. He says martial law, which he notes has been declared sixty-eight times in American history, frightens him because a declaration would suspend the right to vote. Brown says the Supreme Court would be the arbiter if the president did something Congress considered illegal, and he doubts the courts are as impartial as civics lessons suggest. He warns that a clash of that kind could throw things into chaos, and he admits he does not know what would happen next. Jones answers that if one man can annul the right to vote, America is no longer the land of the free. Fear, Hope, and the Politics of Words Brown asks what lesson Brazil holds for America, and he is baffled that a promised $5,000 for voting Republican is not called a bribe. Brown wonders whether a hierarchy of needs, like Maslow's pyramid, explains which priorities voters put first, such as immigration or the economy. He concludes that fear is the greatest motivator in politics, from fascism and communism to democracy itself. Brown contrasts fear with the message of King, Gandhi, Jesus...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    58 分
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
まだレビューはありません