『Shadow Politics with US Senator Michael D Brown』のカバーアート

Shadow Politics with US Senator Michael D Brown

Shadow Politics with US Senator Michael D Brown

著者： BBS Radio BBS Network Inc.
無料で聴く

Shadow Politics is a grass roots talk show giving a voice to the voiceless. For more than 200 years the people of the Nation's Capital have ironically been excluded from the national political conversation. With no voting member of either house of Congress, Washingtonians have lacked the representation they need to be equal and to have their voices heard. Shadow Politics will provide a platform for them, as well as the millions of others nationwide who feel politically disenfranchised and disconnected, to be included in a national dialog. We need to start a new conversation in America, one that is more inclusive and diverse and one that will lead our great nation forward to meet the challenges of the 21st century. At Shadow Politics, we hope to get this conversation started by bringing Americans together to talk about issues important to them. We look forward to having you be part of the discussion so call in and join the conversation. America is calling and we're listening… Shadow Politics is about America hearing what you have to say. It's your chance to talk to an elected official who has spent more than 30 years in Washington politics. We believe that if we start a dialog and others add their voices we will create a chorus. Even if those other politicians in Washington don't hear you — Senator Brown will. He's on a mission to listen to what America has to say and use it to start a productive dialog to make our democracy stronger and more inclusive. If we are all part of the solution we can solve any problem.Copyright 2026 Senator Michael Brown 政治・政府
エピソード
  • Shadow Politics, May 24, 2026

    Shadow Politics, May 24, 2026
    2026/05/25
    Shadow Politics with Senator Michael D. Brown and Co-host Liberty Jones The Moral Arc of America: Marianne Williamson on History, Democracy, Resistance, and the Soul of Politics Guest, Marianne Williamson Michael D. Brown and Liberty Jones Welcome Marianne Williamson In this episode of Shadow Politics, host Former D.C. Shadow Senator Michael D. Brown is joined by co-host Liberty Jones and special guest Marianne Williamson, whom Michael introduces as a former presidential candidate, bestselling author, and influential spiritual and political voice. The conversation begins with Michael praising Marianne’s writing and asking about an article she wrote concerning the period leading into the Civil War. From there, the discussion becomes an examination of America’s contradictions, the moral responsibilities of citizenship, the failures of party politics, and the question of how a new generation can meaningfully resist injustice and authoritarianism. America as Both Promise and Contradiction Marianne says the truth of American history cannot be understood by viewing the nation as either entirely noble or entirely corrupt. She points to the Declaration of Independence and its universal language of equality while noting that many of its signers were themselves slave owners. In her view, the United States has always contained both the forces of oppression and the forces struggling toward liberation: slaveholders and abolitionists, segregationists and civil rights workers, financial exploitation and labor organizing, the suppression of women and the suffrage movement. She argues that the arc of American history has repeatedly bent toward justice, but only because people in each generation chose to fight for it. Lincoln, the Civil War, and Moral Leadership Much of the opening discussion centers on Abraham Lincoln and the moral stakes of the Civil War. Marianne explains that Lincoln understood slavery as incompatible with the Declaration of Independence and its promise of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. She reflects on the human cost of the war and the political risk Lincoln faced when many Northern voters wanted peace rather than continued sacrifice. In her telling, Lincoln’s refusal to accept a settlement that would allow slavery to endure demonstrated genuine moral leadership: he was willing to risk his political future because he believed the preservation of slavery was fundamentally wrong. Liberty connects this history to the present, observing that moral leadership requires the courage to confront injustice even when doing so threatens one’s own power. Reading History and Reclaiming Moral Imagination Liberty asks whether the courage and injustice of earlier eras have been flattened or sanitized by modern media and politics. Marianne agrees that history has been distorted or erased in education and public conversation but urges people not to accept superficial accounts. Her answer is direct: read serious books, study the founders, Lincoln, Franklin Roosevelt, Martin Luther King Jr., Malcolm X, the suffrage movement, labor history, and the anti-war movement. She argues that the political left has lost much of its moral and spiritual imagination, contrasting the present with earlier movements shaped by religious leaders, nonviolent philosophy, and a clear moral vocabulary. Michael responds by suggesting that Shadow Politics begin recommending a book each week, while Marianne mentions her own books, Healing the Soul of America and Politics of Love, as resources exploring spirituality and politics. The Democratic Party, Superdelegates, and the Loss of Trust The conversation then turns to the Democratic Party and what the speakers describe as its internal failures. Marianne argues that political parties are not established by the Constitution and recalls warnings from George Washington and John Adams about party loyalty overpowering loyalty to country. She criticizes the Democratic National Committee’s handling of the 2016 primary, saying the party undermined Bernie Sanders in favor of Hillary Clinton and later defended itself as a private organization not legally required to operate democratically. Michael, drawing from his experience at Democratic conventions and as a superdelegate, discusses the creation of the superdelegate system and recalls pressure to support Clinton once party leaders considered her nomination inevitable. Both say the party has become disconnected from open democratic contest and from a clear commitment to working people. Liberty Jones Asks What Resistance Looks Like Now Liberty responds emotionally to the discussion, asking how younger people can resist when political obstruction appears embedded in official institutions and when online manipulation makes it increasingly difficult to distinguish truth from propaganda. Marianne says young people are confronting an extraordinarily difficult moment because they lack the lived memory of earlier periods when movements ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    54 分
  • Shadow Politics, May 31, 2026

    Shadow Politics, May 31, 2026
    2026/06/01
    Shadow Politics with Senator Michael D. Brown and Co-host Liberty Jones Ranked Choice Voting in D.C.: the New Ballot System Guest, Monica Holman Evans, Executive Director for The District of Columbia Board of Elections Michael D. Brown Opens Shadow Politics In this episode of Shadow Politics, host Former D.C. Shadow Senator Michael D. Brown welcomes co-host Liberty Jones and guest Monica Holman Evans, executive director of the District of Columbia Board of Elections. The conversation focuses on D.C.’s newly implemented ranked choice voting system, which Brown describes as exciting, confusing, and important for voters to understand. Before turning to the mechanics of the system, Brown thanks Monica for joining the program during an already active voting period and notes her long experience in election work. Why Ranked Choice Voting Came to D.C. Monica explains that the Board of Elections did not independently decide to implement ranked choice voting. Instead, D.C. voters approved Initiative 83 in the November 2024 general election, with more than 73% voting yes. The D.C. Council then funded implementation in the FY2026 budget. Monica emphasizes that the Board’s job is now to administer the system clearly, educate voters, and make sure people are not discouraged from voting because the process feels unfamiliar. How Ranked Choice Voting Works Monica explains that ranked choice voting applies to contests with at least three qualified candidates. In those races, voters may rank up to five candidates in order of preference, but they are not required to rank more than one. A voter can still choose only a first-choice candidate if they wish. Monica stresses that ranking additional candidates does not harm a voter’s first choice because only one vote counts at a time. The purpose of the system is to ensure that the winning candidate receives more than 50% of the vote before being declared the winner. Elimination Rounds and Second Choices Brown asks how second-choice votes are counted, and Monica clarifies that second-choice votes are not automatically counted for every voter. If no candidate receives more than 50% in the first round, the candidate with the fewest first-choice votes is eliminated. Then, only the ballots from voters who chose that eliminated candidate are redistributed according to those voters’ next ranked choice. This process continues through tabulation rounds until a candidate crosses the required threshold or the contest is otherwise resolved under the rules. Why Some Support the Change Liberty asks why ranked choice voting has gained momentum and what its benefits are supposed to be. Monica explains that the main premise is that candidates should receive majority support rather than winning with a small plurality in crowded races. She says ranked choice voting has already been used in places such as Arlington County, New York, Minneapolis, and Alaska, but D.C.’s rollout is especially broad because it applies to every Board-administered primary, general, and special election contest with at least three qualified candidates, except political party offices. Voter Education and D.C.’s Unique Rollout Monica says one of the Board’s biggest challenges is voter education. Many people voted for ranked choice voting without fully understanding how large the implementation would be. She also warns voters not to rely only on outside explanations, because ranked choice voting rules differ by jurisdiction. Monica says the D.C. Board of Elections should be treated as the trusted source for how ranked choice voting works in D.C. She also notes that the Board has already had to correct outside materials that gave inaccurate information. Preparing Voters Before They Arrive Monica encourages voters to use the mailed ballot as a voting guide, even if they plan to vote in person. Because ranking candidates can take longer than simply choosing one name, she says voters should study their ballot before arriving at a vote center. The Board expects people may spend more time voting, so preparation can help reduce delays. Monica also says trained site coordinators and informational materials will be available at vote centers to help voters understand the process. At-Large Races and Candidate Strategy Brown raises a concern about D.C.’s at-large races, where voters have historically been able to choose more than one candidate. Monica explains that ranked choice voting will change how those races work in the general election, because voters will rank candidates rather than casting two equal votes. Brown says that, as a former candidate, he would likely urge voters to make him their second choice if he could not be their first. Monica notes that ranked choice voting may encourage candidates to partner, ask supporters to rank allied candidates, and avoid excessive negative campaigning because second- and third-choice support can matter. Mistakes, Overvotes, and Ballot Validity Brown asks what happens if ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    53 分
  • Shadow Politics, April 26, 2026

    Shadow Politics, April 26, 2026
    2026/04/27
    Shadow Politics with Senator Michael D. Brown and Co-host Liberty Jones Reclaiming Truth, Guest, Josh Levs on dismantling victim narratives and the formula for media literacy In this episode of Shadow Politics, former CNN lead fact-checker Josh Levs joins hosts to dissect the systemic collapse of media integrity. He explores how "clickbait politics" and memetic warfare have replaced objective journalism, offering a framework for citizens to reclaim the truth through curiosity and context. The Crisis of Mainstream Media and the Rise of Clickbait The American media landscape has shifted from being a "standard bearer" of truth to a fractured environment driven by engagement metrics. Josh Levs notes that mainstream outlets, including the New York Times, CNN, and the BBC, have frequently failed to correct factual errors or provide necessary context, leading to an all-time low in public trust. This decline is fueled by a corporate focus on short-term stock returns and "rage-bait" headlines designed to trigger emotional responses rather than inform the public. As trust erodes, audiences are increasingly turning to social media, which often acts as a breeding ground for unverified conspiracy theories and partisan echo chambers. Mechanics of Manipulation: Memetic Warfare and Victim Narratives Political extremists on both the far right and far left utilize sophisticated "memetic warfare"—the use of images and brief, emotionally charged messages—to bypass the conscious mind and influence the subconscious. This is often coupled with "victim narratives" based on the "Drama Triangle" (Victim, Villain, Hero). By casting their audience as victims and themselves as heroes, political figures and media outlets manipulate public sentiment to fuel hatred and radicalization. Levs points out that surveys show a growing acceptance of political violence across the spectrum, a reality often ignored by mainstream media because it does not fit their established partisan narratives. Building a Truth Counter-Movement The long-term solution to media manipulation lies in a "truth counter-movement" rooted in curiosity rather than opinion. Levs advocates for a shift in education—moving away from teaching children how to "debate" a side and toward teaching them how to investigate facts. By prioritizing instinctive curiosity and demanding "facts plus context," citizens can pressure the media to return to its essential societal role. Furthermore, the rise of independent voters suggests a potential for a centrist political coalition that could move beyond the hatred-driven duopoly of the current two-party system. The current crisis of truth is a result of both human nature and systemic media failures. However, by recognizing manipulation tactics like the "Drama Triangle" and insisting on a standard of "Facts + Context," individuals can navigate the noise. The path forward requires a collective commitment to curiosity and the courage to hold both media institutions and political leaders accountable to the reality of the facts.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    57 分
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
まだレビューはありません