Saints DC Brandon Staley bothered by Troy Aikman's comments "They're not true"
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
-
ナレーター:
-
著者:
Troy Aikman said the quiet part out loud: Brandon Staley looked like he “had no answers.” The next day, Staley pushed back hard, and I get why. When you’re coaching with a short deck, every blunt assessment feels personal. But if we’re being real, that broadcast line wasn’t just noise. It was a snapshot of what happens when the New Orleans Saints defense loses core pieces and the roster does not replace them with true like-for-like talent.
I walk through the football math behind the regression, starting with the run defense triangle and why removing an elite linebacker like DeMario Davis changes everything at the second level. From there we get into the Saints secondary, the cornerback problems, and what it means when you ask players to jump a tier without proving they can live there. We also talk about the names fans keep debating, from Marshon Lattimore and Alontae Taylor to the ripple effects of injuries and role changes that show up as “bad defense” on Sundays.
Then we zoom out to scheme: the Saints play a ton of zone, and zone only works when communication is sharp and the pass rush arrives on time. No rush means bigger windows, easier throws, and a defense that looks confused even when it’s not. If you care about Saints football, Saints defense, and what roster building looks like when it goes sideways, this one is for you. Subscribe, share the show with a Saints fan, and leave a review with your biggest fix for the defense.