What happens when a parent’s disability is treated as a deficit instead of a difference?

In this episode of Torn, we are joined by Dr. Cheryl Fergerson to examine how the child welfare system responds to parents who are differently abled—and where it continues to fall short.

Through real case examples, this conversation highlights how families are often pulled into the system not because of harm, but because of misunderstanding. From cookie-cutter service plans to the misuse of psychological evaluations, the system frequently fails to account for how parents actually learn, function, and rely on support networks.

Dr. Fergerson introduces a different approach—one that centers strengths, adaptive learning, and individualized supports. She breaks down the gap between traditional evaluations and adaptive parenting assessments, and explains why “reasonable efforts” cannot truly exist without accommodations under the ADA.

This episode also explores:

• How reactive systems create unnecessary removals instead of offering early support

• Why parenting should never be evaluated in isolation

• The critical role of support networks and “eco-mapping” in keeping families together

• How bias—particularly around race, poverty, and language—shapes who is labeled “unfit”

• What advocates can do to push for more individualized, equitable case planning

At its core, this conversation challenges us to rethink what support really looks like—and whether the system is set up to help families succeed or to document their failure.

🎧 This episode is essential listening for anyone advocating for parents with disabilities, challenging compliance-driven systems, or working to ensure that families are supported—not separated.