エピソード

  • THE HIGH PRIEST WE NEED Part 1
    2026/09/22

    Send us Fan Mail

    There is a courtroom you enter every day, whether you meant to or not, and your own conscience has already taken the stand against you. You know the charge. You have known it for years, even if you have never said it out loud. The question this morning is not whether you will stand trial — you already are. The question is who will stand beside you.

    We are not sinners in the soft, apologetic sense our culture has taught us to be comfortable with — we are criminals against a holy God, and criminals need more than sympathy in the courtroom. They need an advocate whose own record cannot be turned against him. Hebrews 7:26 gives us five words for the High Priest we need, and this first message dwells on two of them: holy and harmless. Christ's holiness was never achieved the way ours is achieved, through failure, repentance, and slow recovery. It was simply who He was, from the cradle to the cross, and it is that unearned, unbroken record He now clothes us in. We are not standing before the Father on the strength of this morning's devotion or last night's failure. We are standing in Him.

    The second word cuts just as deep in the other direction. Holy describes His relationship to the Father; harmless describes His relationship to us. Here is a Priest who holds absolute power over every secret you have ever kept, and who has never once closed His fist. He did not call down twelve legions of angels. He did not expose what He knows. He met the adulterous woman and the weeping sinner in Simon's house with the same word: go in peace. If someone with authority over you has ever used it as a weapon instead of a shelter, do not judge Christ by those hands. He is not in the room to hurt you. He is in the room to rescue you — and He has already spent His power doing it.

    In This Episode

    • Why the difference between calling yourself a sinner and admitting you are a criminal against God matters more than it sounds
    • How Christ's holiness differs from ours — not grown through repentance and recovery, but complete from the beginning
    • Why the Father can look at you and call you His holy child, and how that is not wishful thinking but the actual mechanics of the Gospel
    • What it means that Christ is harmless — not weak, but powerful and refusing to use that power against you
    • Why the pain and hardship in your life is not evidence that God has turned against you
    • How Christ dealt with the woman caught in adultery and the sinful woman in Simon's house, and what that says about how He deals with you

    Wherever you have been keeping score this morning, stop — and look instead to the Priest who has already settled the account.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    23 分
  • THE PROMISE OF HEALING Part 2
    2026/09/15

    Send us Fan Mail

    Do you love your dull heart? Do you delight in the distance you feel from God, content to sit in your seat, silent and estranged, while the Father's table sits open and waiting?

    Part one named the ache. This message asks the harder question: do you actually want to be healed of it? Michael returns to Hosea 14:4 to show us a God who heals gently, without lecture, without rebuke, because His anger turned away from us before we ever turned back to Him. He grounds this in the cross, where Christ bore the full wrath that was ours, so that when God disciplines the wandering believer now, it is the discipline of a Father who chases the one He loves, not the wrath of a Judge settling accounts. Using the physical process of healing, a wound plugged, cleansed, and restored, he shows how the Spirit does the same work in a hardened, callused heart.

    He identifies three ways the Spirit brings this healing: a gracious invitation to return, spoken plainly and without condition; a longing planted in the heart for the Lord's fellowship that no husk of this world can satisfy; and the remembrance of the gospel itself, the wrath He bore, the pit He pulled us from, the grace that saved us and must save us still. The answer to backsliding is never a resolution to try harder. It is a fresh look at the cross. Michael closes by asking, plainly, whether we will come like the lost sheep crying to be found, or remain silent in the seat, and he leaves no room to pretend that question does not matter.

    In This Episode

    • Am I actually content with the distance I feel from God, and what does that contentment say about me?
    • Why does God's discipline of a wandering believer never carry His anger or wrath?
    • What does the Spirit actually do to heal a hardened, calloused heart?
    • Is repenting the same as promising God I will try harder from now on?
    • Why must remembering the gospel, and not renewed effort, be the cure for a wandering heart?

    The question was never whether God is willing to heal you. That question is settled. The only question left is whether you will let the Shepherd find you.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    21 分
  • THE PROMISE OF HEALING Part 1
    2026/09/08

    Send us Fan Mail

    You loved God more last year than you do today, and you know it. You have not walked away from Him, not exactly, but something has cooled, and you carry the quiet dread that He may be finished with you. Michael Durham says otherwise, and he says it from the mouth of God Himself.

    We do not like to admit how far our hearts wander in even one good hour, let alone one bad week. Michael takes us to Hosea 14:4, where God says to His backslidden people, "I will heal their backsliding, I will love them freely, for My anger has turned away from him." He shows us that spiritual declension is not an exception in the Christian life but the normal drift of a soul left to itself, the way a swimmer moving upstream slips backward the moment he stops fighting the current. We are not meant to merely believe our depravity as a doctrine. We are meant to feel it, so that the feeling drives us into a desperate dependency on the God who alone can hold us.

    But the text does not leave us in our drift. It anchors us in a covenant that our failures cannot break. Michael traces the certainty of that healing and the love that motivates it from Micah's wonder that God would pardon iniquity to Christ's own prayer for a faltering Peter to the promise that God's attention turns most tenderly toward the child who is sick and unwell. The initiative is always His. He does not wait for us to find our way back to Him before He moves. He moves because His love will not let Him do otherwise, and He is moving toward you this day.

    In This Episode

    • Why does my love for Christ grow cold even when I have not consciously chosen to walk away from Him?
    • Is it enough to believe my sinfulness as a doctrine, or must I actually feel my need for God?
    • Can I trust that God has not given up on me when my devotion has been so inconsistent?
    • What does it mean that God takes the first step toward the backslider, before any repentance has occurred?
    • How does the covenant God made with Peter assure me that my own restoration is certain?

    Backsliding is real, but the covenant standing behind it is more real still. He is not waiting for you to come find Him. He is already seeking you.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    22 分
  • BLESSED IS HE WHO IS NOT OFFENDED Part Two
    2026/09/01

    Send us Fan Mail

    Somewhere along the way, we decided that happiness requires an explanation. That we cannot be at peace with God until He accounts for Himself. But what if the very desire to have God explain His ways to you is the thing standing between you and the happiness He promises?

    Michael Durham continues in Luke 7:18–23, turning from John's crisis to Jesus' answer: "Go and tell John the things you have seen and heard." Jesus does not defend Himself to John. He points to His works — the blind seeing, the lame walking, the dead raised — and lets them speak. Durham presses further into what John actually expected: a Messiah who would overthrow Rome. Jesus was doing something far larger — defeating the tyranny of sin itself — and John's stumbling was never really about whether Jesus was the Christ. It was about whether John would trust the Messiah when the Messiah refused to act like the Messiah he had imagined.

    From there, Durham unpacks the word "offended" — not mere insult, but the idea of stumbling, tripping over Jesus Himself because He will not conform to our expectations. He is careful to distinguish this from a false asceticism that treats unhappiness as spiritual virtue; the Beatitudes themselves promise blessedness, and Psalm 100 commands gladness. True happiness, Durham insists, is not tied to circumstances but to the unshakable character of Christ. He closes with four practical postures for the believer standing where John stood: cooperate with God rather than demand explanations, bring Him into the difficulty through prayer rather than silence, look for where He is already leading rather than waiting for full clarity, and — above all — do not run. Whatever God is doing, however confusing His providence, the call is not to understand Him but to trust Him.

    In This Episode

    • Why Jesus answered John's doubt with works, not explanations
    • What John's expectation of a political Messiah reveals about our own expectations of God
    • Why the word "offended" really means stumbling over Christ Himself
    • Why happiness in the Christian life was never meant to depend on understanding God's ways
    • Four practical postures for trusting God when His providence makes no sense — cooperate, pray, watch for His leadership, and don't run
    • Why fleeing from a confusing providence only deepens the confusion, and staying is itself an act of faith

    He is not asking you to understand Him. He is asking you to let Him be God — and to be happy while He does.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    25 分
  • BLESSED IS HE WHO IS NOT OFFENDED Part 1
    2026/08/25

    Send us Fan Mail

    There is a particular kind of doubt that only comes after you have been right about God once. Not the doubt of the unconvinced, but the doubt of the man who saw the dove descend, heard the voice from heaven, and now sits in a cell wondering if he imagined the whole thing. We know that cell. Most of us have sat in some version of it.

    Michael Durham opens Luke 7:18–23 with a question we don't expect from the man who introduced the world to the Lamb of God. From prison, John the Baptist sends word to Jesus: "Are You the Coming One, or do we look for another?" It is not curiosity. It is crisis. The man who baptized Christ, who heard the Father's voice, who preached with more certainty than almost anyone in Scripture, is now offended at the very Messiah he announced — because Jesus has not moved the way John expected Him to move. Durham traces this same pattern through Abraham, Joseph, and David: men who thought they had God figured out, and were proven wrong every time, not because God failed them, but because He refused to conform to their plans.

    The burden of this message is not John's biography. It is ours. We build our expectations of what God must do, and when He does something else — something slower, harder, less explicable — our faith wobbles exactly the way John's did. Durham insists this is not evidence of unbelief; it is the normal cost of walking by faith and not by sight, and the antidote is not a better explanation of our circumstances but a return to the unchanging character of the God who is directing them. Jesus does not defend Himself to John. He simply points to His works and lets them speak. That answer, Durham argues, is the one we need too.

    In This Episode

    • Why disappointment with God is not the same thing as unbelief — and why John the Baptist proves it
    • What it means that God is, by His nature, a non-conformist to our plans
    • How Abraham, Joseph, and David each faced the same crisis of unmet expectation
    • Why bad circumstances do not mean you have been faithless
    • What it looks like to walk by faith when you cannot walk by sight
    • Why the evidence of God's faithfulness was never meant to be found in His timing

    His purposes have not stopped moving toward you. They have simply stopped moving the way you expected — and that is where faith, not certainty, is asked to carry you the rest of the way.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    25 分
  • A DISCUSSION ABOUT PREACHING Part 3
    2026/08/18

    Send us Fan Mail

    You have driven home from church more than once wondering whether anything actually happened up there, or whether you simply performed a well-constructed talk. You cannot always tell the difference between a sermon and true preaching — not from the pulpit, and sometimes not even in the moment. This is the ache no seminary prepared you for.

    In this concluding conversation on preaching, Michael Durham and Mack Tomlinson turn from theology to practice and take up a word the modern church has largely surrendered to abuse: anointing. They trace it through the apostolic preaching of Acts — Peter, Stephen, Philip, Paul — men who often spoke without notes because the Holy Spirit gave them, in the hour, exactly what the moment required. But they do not stop at first-century extraordinary gifting. They press into what the anointing means for the ordinary man in an ordinary pulpit this Sunday: that God's presence resting on a preacher is not a Pentecostal excess to be embarrassed by, but a biblical reality every faithful man must seek, and every faithful congregation must pray for.

    The conversation turns practical and searching. Durham confesses that decades of preaching have taught him that preparation without desperate prayer is presumption, and prayer without preparation is likewise disobedience — the two must marry before a man ever climbs the steps to the pulpit. He and Tomlinson discuss Spurgeon's whispered confession of dependence before he preached, the difference between degrees of anointing across church history, and the sober reminder from men like Andrew Bonar and Kenneth MacRae that the same Spirit who sends revival also sustains the plodding, faithful, unspectacular work of ordinary ministry. The episode closes not with formula but with an invitation: to want, again, what only the Spirit can give.

    In This Episode

    • What the New Testament actually means when it uses the word anointing, and why the term has been hijacked
    • How the apostles preached in Acts — often extemporaneously — and what that reveals about dependence versus preparation
    • Why sermon preparation without agonizing prayer is one danger, and prayer without preparation is another
    • Spurgeon's private prayer of dependence in the moments before he stepped into the pulpit
    • The difference between the ordinary, sustaining work of the Spirit and the extraordinary seasons of revival
    • What Andrew Bonar and Kenneth MacRae's diaries teach about a life given over to seeking God's power in preaching

    If you have ever stood in a pulpit, or sat under one, and sensed that something more was possible than what you have known — you are not wrong, and He has not stopped giving what only He can give.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    28 分
  • A DISCUSSION ABOUT PREACHING Part 2
    2026/08/11

    Send us Fan Mail

    You have heard good preaching — careful, faithful, doctrinally sound. But you have never been in a service where no one moved afterward. Where the silence was not awkward but holy. Where God was so present that the man who preached simply sat down, and the room knew something had happened that no one had planned.

    In this second conversation, Michael Durham and Mack Tomlinson press deeper into the question that haunts every honest pastor: what is the difference between preaching that informs and preaching that breaks something open? The answer, they argue, is not technique or gifting or preparation. It is the Holy Spirit. Not the Spirit presumed upon, not the Spirit spoken of theologically while left practically unaccounted for, but the Spirit present in power, filling the preacher with an authority the preacher himself cannot manufacture, making the words land with a weight that the congregation recognizes as coming from somewhere beyond the man. Paul told the Thessalonians that his Gospel came not in word only, but in power and in the Holy Spirit and in much assurance. Tomlinson and Durham grieve that most preaching today, for all its doctrinal excellence, has settled for the word only.

    The conversation moves from principle to testimony — a service in Romania where couples began weeping and repenting mid-sermon without any invitation, a Banner of Truth conference where the preacher preached four times with an authority that moved men to tears, and a Lord's Day at Providence Chapel in March 2020, where God came in such unmistakable power that the congregation sat in holy silence for nearly an hour, men stood to confess sin, women prayed with tears, and no elder dared move to close the service. These are not stories offered as nostalgia. They are offered as evidence — that what the church has been told to stop expecting is precisely what the church most desperately needs.

    In This Episode

    • What it means that the Holy Spirit is not merely present in the regenerate minister but must be actively filling and anointing him for there to be true preaching
    • Why Paul's claim that his gospel came "not in word only" is a quiet indictment of much that passes for faithful preaching today
    • How hyper-dispensationalism and charismatic excess have together produced evangelical churches that are functionally afraid of the Holy Spirit
    • Why a George Whitefield arising today would likely be opposed by good Reformed men — and what that reveals about how far the tradition has drifted from itself
    • What happens when a church's order of service leaves no room for God to interrupt it — and why that is more serious than it sounds
    • What the March 2020 service at Providence Chapel looked like, felt like, and meant — told by one of the elders who was in the room

    The church does not need better-organized services or more carefully crafted sermons — it needs the Spirit of God to fall on the men who preach and the people who hear, and it needs elders wise enough to sit still when He does.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    23 分
  • A DISCUSSION ABOUT PREACHING Part 1
    2026/08/04

    Send us Fan Mail

    You have sat under Bible teaching for years — careful, accurate, well-organized Bible teaching — and yet something is missing. The word has informed you. It has not undone you. And you are beginning to wonder if that is simply the way it is, or if something has been lost.

    In this first conversation between Michael Durham and his longtime friend, Mack Tomlinson, the two men put their finger on one of the most consequential distinctions in the life of the modern church: the difference between teaching and preaching. It is not a small distinction. Teaching imparts information; preaching seeks an encounter. The teacher wants the congregation to understand something. The preacher wants them to meet Someone. And when that difference is blurred — when excellent doctrinal instruction is mistaken for the thing the New Testament calls preaching — the result is churches that are, in Durham's words, at the greatest height of theological knowledge they have ever known and hollow experientially at the same time.

    Durham and Tomlinson trace this drift to the rise of the Bible Church movement in the early twentieth century, the narrowing of expository preaching to mean verse-by-verse commentary, and the loss of what the great preachers of previous centuries called a word from God — that burden over a text, in prayer, before a man dares to stand and declare it. Spurgeon did not preach until a text had, in his own words, bitten him. Whitefield, McCheyne, Bonar, Rowland — men rarely preached through books of the Bible. They preached a word they believed God had given them for that congregation, on that Lord's Day, at that hour. The recovery of that conviction, these two men argue, is not a minor adjustment. It may be the most urgent need in evangelical pulpits today.

    In This Episode

    • What the New Testament word for preaching actually means — and why the image of a herald changes everything
    • Why a man can be an excellent teacher and not a preacher, and why the church desperately needs both to be distinguished
    • How the Bible Church movement, for all its doctrinal faithfulness, contributed to the loss of true preaching in America
    • What the classical definition of expository preaching actually is — and why most seminary students today have never heard it
    • Why Spurgeon said he did not have the gifts necessary to preach verse-by-verse through books of the Bible — and what that should do to our assumptions
    • What it means for a preacher to have a word from God, why that language frightens Reformed people, and why it shouldn't

    A congregation cannot encounter the living God through information alone — and the men who knew this best were the men who refused to enter a pulpit until they had first been broken open by what they were about to proclaim.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    24 分