『Popcorn and Compliance』のカバーアート

Popcorn and Compliance

Popcorn and Compliance

著者: Thomas Fox
無料で聴く

概要
Do you love the movies? Are you passionate about compliance? If the answer to one or both of those questions is Yes; this is the podcast series for you. In Popcorn and Compliance, recovering screenwriter Jay Rosen and Tom Fox, the Voice of Compliance take a look at contemporary and classic movies for compliance, business, life lessons and much more.© Thomas R. Fox アート 政治・政府 経済学
エピソード
  • Episode 5: Frankenstein Meets the Wolf Man When Monsters Collide: Compliance and Enterprise Risk
    2026/10/30
    Synopsis Frankenstein Meets the Wolf Man begins primarily as a continuation of Larry Talbot's story from The Wolf Man. Talbot, played by Lon Chaney Jr., is resurrected and desperately seeks a way to end his werewolf curse. His search eventually leads him to the ruins of Frankenstein's castle, where he discovers Frankenstein's Monster frozen beneath the wreckage and revives him. Dr. Mannering becomes involved in an attempt to cure Talbot while also restoring the Monster to full strength. The inevitable result is the movie's great selling point: the Wolf Man and Frankenstein's Monster, now played by Bela Lugosi, finally collide. It was the first Universal film to bring two of its major horror characters together in this fashion. Five Compliance, Ethics, and Leadership Highlights · Risks do not exist in silos. · Risk aggregation belongs in enterprise risk management. · AI governance demonstrates the problem perfectly. · The CCO should be a connector, not the owner of everything. · Boards need to see the entire castle. Popcorn and Compliance takeaway: The greatest enterprise risk may not be Frankenstein's Monster or the Wolf Man. It may be what happens when two risks nobody considered together finally collide. What monsters are we managing separately that we should be examining together? Closing the Popcorn and Compliance Frankenstein Series Across these five films, we get something remarkably close to the lifecycle of a corporate compliance failure. Henry Frankenstein creates risk without adequate governance. In Bride of Frankenstein, leadership knows the danger but succumbs to pressure and ethical compromise. In Son of Frankenstein, a new generation inherits unresolved legacy risk. In The Ghost of Frankenstein, supposedly resolved problems return because remediation and controls are ineffective. Finally, in Frankenstein Meets the Wolf Man, an unresolved risk collides with another risk and becomes an enterprise problem. That is what makes these movies such fertile territory for Popcorn and Compliance. The Monster is never simply the Monster. He is the product of decisions, incentives, weak controls, poor oversight, inadequate remediation, and leaders who repeatedly convince themselves that this time they can manage the consequences. For the compliance professional, there may be no better question to take from the entire Universal Frankenstein cycle: What Monster is your organization creating, inheriting, reviving, or failing to see today? Timothy and Fiona are AI generated voices Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
    続きを読む 一部表示
    24 分
  • Episode 4: The Ghost of Frankenstein Declaring the Monster Dead Is Not a Control
    2026/10/23
    Synopsis By The Ghost of Frankenstein, Boris Karloff has departed the role and Lon Chaney Jr. takes over as the Monster, while Bela Lugosi returns as Ygor. After escaping another attempt by villagers to destroy them, Ygor brings the Monster to Ludwig Frankenstein, another son of Henry Frankenstein. Ludwig initially wants nothing to do with his family's disastrous legacy, but inevitably becomes involved and develops a plan to cure the Monster through brain transplantation. Ygor and Ludwig's disgraced colleague Bohmer secretly substitute Ygor's brain for the intended healthy brain. Predictably, remediation becomes another catastrophe. Five Compliance, Ethics, and Leadership Highlights · Repeat failures indicate ineffective remediation. · Closing a finding does not mean fixing a finding. · Bohmer demonstrates management override and control circumvention. · COSO asks us to look at the whole control environment. · Root cause is more important than symptoms. Popcorn and Compliance takeaway: Declaring the Monster dead is not a control. You have to test whether he can get back up. And then Universal does something different. Instead of giving us another Frankenstein problem, it introduces another monster entirely. What happens when two independently dangerous risks meet? Timothy and Fiona are AI generated voices Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
    続きを読む 一部表示
    24 分
  • Episode 3: Son of Frankenstein – Inheriting the Castle Means Inheriting the Risk
    2026/10/16
    This October, Tom Fox returns to one of his all-time favorites: Universal Pictures’ Classic monsters. Over the years, Tom has explored classics like Dracula, The Mummy, The Wolf Man, and The Invisible Man, as well as films by Val Lewton and Hammer Studios. This year, he wanted to return for a deep dive into the first five Frankenstein movies. He has considered, or will consider, the original Frankenstein, Bride of Frankenstein, Ghost of Frankenstein, and Frankenstein Meets the Wolfman. In this third episode, he considers what many viewers regard as the series’ best: Son of Frankenstein, released in 1939. This is the final film to feature Boris Karloff as Frankenstein’s Monster. In this exploration, Tom Fox uses his AI friends, Timothy and Fiona, to provide commentary. Film Synopsis: Son of Frankenstein brings Basil Rathbone into the saga as Wolf von Frankenstein, who returns with his family to his father’s estate hoping to restore the Frankenstein name. Instead, he encounters Bela Lugosi’s extraordinary Ygor and discovers that his father’s Monster, played for the final time by Boris Karloff, is still alive but comatose. Wolf revives him, hoping to vindicate his father’s work, but Ygor has his own plans and uses the Monster to settle old scores. The result is another catastrophe created by a Frankenstein convinced that this time things will be different. Key highlights: You can inherit risk without creating it. This is the M&A compliance movie. Ygor represents institutional knowledge used for the wrong purpose. Inspector Krogh represents institutional memory. Red flags transform governance responsibility. Popcorn and Compliance takeaway: You may not have created the Monster, but once you know he is in the basement, he becomes your governance problem. Timothy and Fiona are AI-generated voices courtesy of NotebookLM. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
    続きを読む 一部表示
    25 分
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
まだレビューはありません