Send us Fan Mail

A sign means something. When you see a stop sign there’s no mystery about its meaning. Some signs are not as clear, and we have to interpret their meaning. For example, when someone sees neighborhood disorder or social incivilities, such as obvious drug dealing, these serve as warning signals about the potential for crime victimization. This can then lead to a fear of crime. Sometimes other factors can come into play that impact a person’s fear. These “other factors” interfere with the original sign, signaling something that makes you feel safe. This is important for people who live in areas that suffer from a multitude of disorders or incivilities. What are some of the other factors that can influence a person’s perception of safety? If we know what those factors are, can we increase them, thus improve feelings of safety?

Joining the podcast is Doctor Travis M. Carter, an Assistant Professor in the School of Criminology and Criminal Justice at the University of Nebraska at Omaha. He discusses his recent study titled “Explaining the relationship between neighborhood disorder and crime fear.

Main Topics

• Incivilities create the perception of crime, but social capital, perceptions of enhanced informal social control and social cohesion, serve as cognitive heuristics that signal to people that their chances of victimization are lower.
• The “reassurance factor” describes people’s confidence in their local police as directly tied to fear of crime in their neighborhood.
• The research findings suggest that perceptions of ongoing local social processes by neighbors and the police are fundamental to understanding why disorder is associated with fear of crime.

Don't forget to like, FOLLOW, and share. Sharing this podcast or an episode is one of the best complements I can receive, which will help grow the show.

And don't forget to provide a review. Giving five stars is never a bad idea.

Feel free to email me your comments using the "send us a text" option (above), or at the following email address: policeinservicetrainingpodcast@gmail.com

You can also contact me at: Bluesky: @policeinservice.bsky.social

Send us Fan Mail

A society wants order and the police were developed as the government vehicle to achieve that goal. There is often tension between the goal of order and how it is achieved. The tension often results from errors on the part of the responding officer. This explains why alternative methods for dealing with lower-level social disorders have been explored. Nevertheless, alternative systems to deal with order maintenance and peace keeping may carry their own risks and unknown costs. How do we know precisely the risk level of different call types? Should regular police officers continue to respond to low-level problems? Joining the podcast is Dr. Loren Atherley, the Sr Director of Performance Analytics & Research and the Senior Research Scientist for the Seattle Police Department. We discuss his recent study titled, Risk Managed Demand: Operational Risk Management in Police Response to Calls for Service.

Main Topics

• An “all-hazards response” is the traditional approach to social problems that require police intervention.
• Risk Management literature tells us that risk can be minimized but not eliminated. So, how much risk are we prepared to accept with a non-officer response?
• The research identified 4 tiers of social response.
• There is no clearly identified “call type” that is low hazard; rather a model of call triage is being developed.

Don't forget to like, FOLLOW, and share. Sharing this podcast or an episode is one of the best complements I can receive, which will help grow the show.

And don't forget to provide a review. Giving five stars is never a bad idea.

Feel free to email me your comments using the "send us a text" option (above), or at the following email address: policeinservicetrainingpodcast@gmail.com

You can also contact me at: Bluesky: @policeinservice.bsky.social

Send us Fan Mail

Mental health calls to the police can be challenging for many reasons. One of the primary problems with sending the police is that they are not usually properly trained to handle a person experiencing a mental health crisis. The past few years have seen shifts from a law enforcement to a service response. The Co-Responder model melds police officers and social service clinicians with the goal of improving services while maintaining safety for the responders, the public, and the patient. Dr. Vaughn Crichlow, the dean of the School of Justice Studies at Roger Williams University joins the podcast to discuss his recent study exploring the perspectives of police and clinicians and their perceived impact of the co-responder program.

Main Topics

• Both officers and clinicians bring different perspectives that needed to be understood by each other to develop a successful co-responder program.
• The research uncovered different themes, such as sense-making, collaboration, and safety, that will be important for agencies interested in developing a co-responder model.
• The public believes these programs are important, but there can still be hurdles in their acceptance if they have questions about police legitimacy.
• The co-responder model does not replace the police; it is a collaborative approach to handle these calls for service.

Don't forget to like, FOLLOW, and share. Sharing this podcast or an episode is one of the best complements I can receive, which will help grow the show.

And don't forget to provide a review. Giving five stars is never a bad idea.

Feel free to email me your comments using the "send us a text" option (above), or at the following email address: policeinservicetrainingpodcast@gmail.com

You can also contact me at: Bluesky: @policeinservice.bsky.social