エピソード

  • A Good Decision Can Still Have a Bad Outcome | Ep. 65
    2026/08/28

    Send us Fan Mail

    You cannot judge the quality of a decision based only on the outcome.

    In this episode of the Plain English Finance Podcast, Tré and Sierra discuss how to make better financial decisions by focusing on the information you had, the range of possible outcomes, and whether the decision would still make sense if you repeated it many times under similar circumstances. The episode starts with a simple illustration: one person drinks and drives but gets home safely, while another takes a taxi and gets into an accident. The outcome looks backwards, but the taxi was still the better decision because it reduced unnecessary risk.

    The same idea applies to personal finance. A bad investment decision can occasionally work out. A good financial decision can still lead to an uncomfortable result. That does not mean the decision was wrong. It means decisions should be judged by process, not hindsight.

    In this episode, we discuss:

    • Why outcomes alone do not tell you whether a decision was good
    • Why likely outcomes matter more than perfect hindsight
    • Why a good decision should improve your odds, not guarantee success
    • Why bad decisions can sometimes lead to good outcomes
    • How to think about decisions you would repeat 1,000 times
    • Why too much information can lead to decision paralysis
    • How to decide what information actually matters
    • Why people often get stuck on small financial details
    • Why every decision has a downside
    • Why “safe” options can still carry risk
    • How to compare real alternatives instead of imaginary risk-free choices
    • Why worst-case scenarios matter
    • Why a financial plan should focus on avoiding unacceptable outcomes
    • When to revisit a decision after it has been made

    Good decisions do not guarantee good outcomes. They improve the odds, protect you from avoidable mistakes, and give you a defensible reason for acting when certainty is impossible.

    Website | Youtube | Linkedin

    続きを読む 一部表示
    32 分
  • Why You Can’t Stop Fighting About Money (And How To Fix It) | Ep. 64
    2026/08/21

    Send us Fan Mail

    Why do couples keep having the same money arguments?

    In this episode of the Plain English Finance Podcast, Sierra and Tré talk about the money conversations couples avoid and why many financial arguments are not really about the dollars. They're often about safety, security, freedom, control, fairness, guilt, or feeling unheard.

    The conversation touches on money scripts, financial infidelity, hidden accounts, different upbringings, perpetual relationship problems, and why couples can share the same financial goal but still disagree about how to get there. Sierra also connects the conversation to relationship research around recurring conflict, while Tré explains how these patterns often show up in financial planning conversations with couples.

    In this episode, we discuss:

    • Why money fights are often about deeper emotional needs
    • What “money scripts” are and why they matter
    • Why couples can see money through completely different lenses
    • How safety, security, control, freedom, fairness, and guilt show up in money decisions
    • Why hidden savings accounts can sometimes be tied to fear or insecurity
    • Why some money conflicts become recurring “perpetual problems”
    • Why couples often stay stuck arguing about the surface issue
    • How to reframe money arguments by asking what the real concern is
    • Why outside guidance can help when couples are gridlocked
    • How Tré and Sierra use systems to reduce daily money friction
    • Why separate spending accounts can reduce unnecessary conflict
    • Why check-ins still matter even when systems are in place
    • Why curiosity usually works better than criticism

    Website | Youtube | Linkedin

    続きを読む 一部表示
    22 分
  • Do Financial Planners Judge Your Money Decisions? | Ep. 63
    2026/08/14

    Send us Fan Mail

    What is it actually like to be married to a financial planner?

    In this episode of the Plain English Finance Podcast, Sierra and Tré talk about the pros, cons, myths, and awkward social dynamics that come with being married to someone who works in financial planning. The conversation covers financial literacy, complacency, money mistakes, judgment, family expectations, lending money, and the pressure people sometimes feel when money comes up socially.

    One of the biggest benefits is having someone deeply invested in the family’s financial picture. But one of the biggest risks is becoming too dependent on that person and not developing your own financial knowledge. Sierra talks about the temptation to default to Tré, while Tré explains why he still wants her involved in day-to-day financial decisions.

    In this episode, we discuss:

    • The obvious pros of being married to a financial planner
    • Why financial knowledge can create complacency
    • Why both spouses still need to understand the family finances
    • Why financial planners are still human and make mistakes
    • A real example involving property taxes early in marriage
    • Why people sometimes over-explain their spending around financial professionals
    • Whether financial planners are silently judging your choices
    • Why social money conversations can feel awkward
    • Why one-off financial decisions usually lack enough context to judge
    • The pressure to appear successful when people know what you do
    • Driving an older car while working in wealth management
    • First-generation wealth and family expectations
    • The difference between helping and enabling
    • Why lending money to friends or family can damage relationships
    • Why gifts and loans should be treated very differently

    Website | Youtube | Linkedin

    続きを読む 一部表示
    39 分
  • The Default Retirement Decisions Most People Get Wrong | Ep. 62
    2026/08/07

    Send us Fan Mail

    What retirement decisions should you make if you don't know where to start?

    In this episode of the Plain English Finance Podcast, Tré and Sierra discuss a “default decision” framework for retirement planning. The goal is not to pretend there is one perfect answer for everyone. The goal is to start with a reasonable default, then ask: why might this not apply to me?

    This episode focuses on several major retirement decisions: when to withdraw from RRSPs, when to take CPP and Old Age Security, how to think about investment allocation, and which retirement risks are worth taking versus avoiding.

    For retirees with enough assets that they are not forced to withdraw just to pay bills, the planning question often shifts from “where do I get income?” to “how do I draw income tax-efficiently?” That can make RRSP withdrawals, CPP timing, OAS clawback planning, and investment structure much more important.

    In this episode, we discuss:

    • Why default decisions can help simplify retirement planning
    • When to start withdrawing from RRSPs
    • Why low-income retirement years may be useful RRSP withdrawal years
    • Why RRSP taxes will eventually be paid either during life or at death
    • Why delaying CPP and Old Age Security can be powerful
    • Why CPP and OAS are more than just “extra pension money”
    • How OAS clawback can make certain income ranges very expensive
    • Why the fixed-income part of a portfolio should have a clear job
    • Why reducing volatility is not the only reason to own fixed income
    • How a cash wedge or war chest can protect retirement spending
    • Why each dollar in retirement should have a purpose
    • Why inflation may be more dangerous than market volatility
    • Why individual business risk can be disastrous in retirement
    • Why diversification should make every bad thing hurt a little, but nothing hurt a lot

    Website | Youtube | Linkedin

    続きを読む 一部表示
    18 分
  • Don’t Hire an Advisor Without Asking This | Ep. 61
    2026/07/31

    Send us Fan Mail

    Does your financial advisor have a clear investment philosophy?

    In this episode of the Plain English Finance Podcast, Tré and Sierra discuss why your investment strategy should not be treated as a random collection of products, funds, trends or one-off opinions. The way you invest affects the rest of your financial plan, including tax planning, retirement income, corporate investing, asset location and how much risk you are actually taking.

    The key idea is that there are many valid ways to invest, but your investment approach needs to be consistent enough that the planning around it still works. A high-dividend strategy, momentum strategy, index-based strategy, active stock-picking strategy or conservative fixed-income approach can each create different tax, income and risk outcomes. That means the “best” strategy is not just the one that sounds good. It is the one you understand, can stick with, and can build a real financial plan around.

    In this episode, we discuss:

    • What an investment philosophy actually means
    • Why there is no single perfect way to invest
    • Why your advisor should be able to explain and defend their philosophy
    • Why changing one part of the portfolio can affect the rest of the plan
    • Why high-dividend strategies sound appealing but can create planning issues
    • Why corporate owners need to think carefully about investment income
    • How passive income rules can be affected by portfolio income
    • Why momentum strategies can work but may create higher volatility and tax drag
    • Why fixed income should have a defined role in the plan
    • Why “we customize everything” can sometimes be a red flag
    • Why your investment plan and tax plan need to be connected
    • What to ask an advisor before trusting them with your portfolio

    The main point is simple:

    You do not need to understand every investment philosophy in the world. But you do need to understand the one being used with your money.

    If an advisor cannot explain their investment philosophy in plain English, that is a problem. If they can explain it, but you cannot stick with it when markets are uncomfortable, that is also a problem.

    Website | Youtube | Linkedin

    続きを読む 一部表示
    21 分
  • BONUS: The Market Won’t Wait Until You Feel Better | Q2 2026 Review
    2026/07/24

    Send us Fan Mail

    Markets do not wait until investors feel comfortable again.

    In this Q2 2026 market review, Tré Bynoe, CFP®, CIM®, looks at what happened across Canadian stocks, U.S. stocks, international stocks and bonds from mid-2025 to mid-2026, then focuses on the more important lesson: long-term returns are never experienced in a smooth straight line.

    The past year showed why reacting emotionally to market declines can be costly. Canadian stocks returned approximately 32%, U.S. stocks approximately 27%, international stocks approximately 25%, Canadian bonds approximately 3.5%, and global bonds approximately 1.5% over the period discussed in the episode.

    But the real lesson is not which market performed best. Recent returns tell us what happened, not what will happen next, and using short-term performance as a forecast can lead investors into poor decisions.

    In this episode, we discuss:

    • Why markets can recover before the headlines improve
    • Why waiting for certainty is so difficult to execute
    • What Q2 2026 showed investors about volatility
    • Why long-term returns feel much worse while you are living through them
    • Why getting out of the market creates a second hard decision: when to get back in
    • Why diversification means something in your portfolio will usually disappoint you
    • Why a portfolio should not depend on guessing the next winning asset class
    • Why bonds and cash still matter when equities are performing well
    • Why short-term spending needs should not be invested in equities
    • Why volatility is a feature of markets, not a flaw
    • Why the right plan needs to exist before the next market decline

    Website | Youtube | Linkedin

    続きを読む 一部表示
    7 分
  • Your Password Isn’t Enough Anymore | Ep. 60
    2026/07/17

    Send us Fan Mail

    Does it feel like staying safe online is getting harder?

    In this episode of the Plain English Finance Podcast, Tré and Sierra talk about one simple digital safety step that more people need to understand: using an authenticator app for two-factor authentication. This is especially important for bank accounts, email accounts, MyCRA, investment accounts, shopping accounts, and anything else that could cause serious problems if someone gained access.

    Scammers are getting better, passwords are getting leaked, and older family members are often being asked to make a technology leap that feels overwhelming. A username and password may have been enough years ago, but today they are often not enough to keep important accounts safe.

    In this episode, we discuss:

    • What an authenticator app is
    • How two-factor authentication works
    • Why passwords alone are outdated
    • Why leaked usernames and passwords are such a problem
    • Why authenticator apps are stronger than relying only on passwords
    • Why older adults are especially vulnerable to online scams
    • How scammers use fear, urgency, and emotion
    • Why you should protect email, banking, CRA, and investment accounts first
    • Why the human being is usually the weak point, not the technology
    • How authentication apps use changing codes
    • Why setting this up may feel annoying but is worth it
    • How trusted contacts can help prevent scams
    • A real family story involving a fake emergency phone scam
    • Why AI and voice scams may make this problem worse

    The main point is simple:

    If an account matters to you, protect it with two-factor authentication.

    Website | Youtube | Linkedin

    続きを読む 一部表示
    16 分
  • 3 Warning Signs Your Corporate Wealth Plan Isn’t Working | Ep. 59
    2026/07/10

    Send us Fan Mail

    How do you know if the way you are managing wealth inside your corporation is actually working?

    In this episode of the Plain English Finance Podcast, Tré and Sierra discuss three warning signs that a corporation owner may not have a real financial plan: too much idle corporate cash, an advisor who is not discussing taxes, and no clear exit strategy for the business. The episode also includes a bonus red flag: using the exact same investments across your TFSA, RRSP, and corporate account without considering tax efficiency or asset location.

    For Canadian corporation owners, incorporated professionals and business owners, these issues can become expensive because mistakes compound quietly. A strategy that feels “fine” today can create tax, investment and planning problems years later when the money matters most.

    In this episode, we discuss:

    • Why corporate cash sitting in a chequing account may be a red flag
    • How much operating cash a business may actually need
    • Why excess corporate cash should have a defined purpose
    • Why setting up the right accounts early can prevent years of delay
    • Why not every advisor is a financial planner
    • Why not every financial planner specializes in corporations
    • Why tax planning matters when investing outside RRSPs and TFSAs
    • Why business owners should understand their eventual exit strategy
    • How selling shares, winding down a business, or retiring can create different tax issues
    • Why the Lifetime Capital Gains Exemption and corporate structure can matter
    • Why identical portfolios across TFSA, RRSP and corporate accounts may signal weak asset-location planning
    • Why good intentions from an advisor do not guarantee good advice

    The main idea is simple: if your corporation is accumulating wealth, you need more than an investment account. You need a structure for deciding how much cash to keep in the business, what to invest, where to locate assets, and how today’s decisions affect your future exit, retirement, and taxes.

    A corporation can be a powerful financial planning tool, but only if the plan is deliberate.

    Website | Youtube | Linkedin

    続きを読む 一部表示
    21 分