エピソード

  • 97. Is Academic Research Compromising Its Own Standards – Ashley Rubin
    2026/09/23

    Are political considerations, ideological conformity, and fear of backlash compromising scholarly standards in higher education?

    When public trust in knowledge-producing institutions breaks down, arriving at a shared baseline of facts becomes nearly impossible. In this episode, we speak with Dr. Ashley Rubin, Professor of Sociology at the University of Hawaii at Mānoa, about her work on a multi-university commission investigating politicization across academic disciplines.

    Dr. Rubin brings an empirical, diagnostic lens to the debate, breaking down the systemic pressures inside higher education—from self-censorship and peer review challenges to the decline of traditional objectivity.

    Text me your feedback and leave your contact info if you'd like a reply (this is a one-way text). Thanks, David

    Support the show

    Show Notes:
    https://outrageoverload.net/

    Contact me, David Beckemeyer by email outrageoverload@gmail.com. Follow the show on Instagram @OutrageOverload. We are also on Facebook /OutrageOverload. Check out our Subtstack https://outrageoverload.substack.com

    HOTLINE: 925-552-7885

    Got a Question, comment or just thoughts you'd like to share? Call the O2 hotline and leave a message and you could be featured in an upcoming episode

    If you would like to help the show, you can contribute here. Tell everyone you know about the show. That’s the best way to support it.

    Rate and Review the show on Podchaser: https://www.podchaser.com/OutrageOverload

    Also check out our companion podcasts, This Week in Outrage and Outrage Science Bites.

    Intro music and outro music by Michael Ramir C.

    Many thanks to my co-editor and co-director, Austin Chen.

    Outrage Overload, a Conners Institute podcast, is part of The Democr...

    続きを読む 一部表示
    33 分
  • Spotlight Series: Decoding Democratic Socialism vs. Social Democracy
    2026/09/16

    Are you confused by the constant mix-up of political terms in modern headlines? Is Sweden socialist? What does the DSA actually want? Are Social Democrats and Democratic Socialists the same thing?

    In this episode, we break down the major ideological definitions, clear up the common misunderstandings, and explain what separates welfare-state capitalism from true democratic control of the economy.

    Text me your feedback and leave your contact info if you'd like a reply (this is a one-way text). Thanks, David

    Support the show

    Show Notes:
    https://outrageoverload.net/

    Contact me, David Beckemeyer by email outrageoverload@gmail.com. Follow the show on Instagram @OutrageOverload. We are also on Facebook /OutrageOverload. Check out our Subtstack https://outrageoverload.substack.com

    HOTLINE: 925-552-7885

    Got a Question, comment or just thoughts you'd like to share? Call the O2 hotline and leave a message and you could be featured in an upcoming episode

    If you would like to help the show, you can contribute here. Tell everyone you know about the show. That’s the best way to support it.

    Rate and Review the show on Podchaser: https://www.podchaser.com/OutrageOverload

    Also check out our companion podcasts, This Week in Outrage and Outrage Science Bites.

    Intro music and outro music by Michael Ramir C.

    Many thanks to my co-editor and co-director, Austin Chen.

    Outrage Overload, a Conners Institute podcast, is part of The Democr...

    続きを読む 一部表示
    31 分
  • 96. Navigating Uncertainty: The Philosophy of Orientation - Douglas Giles
    2026/09/09

    When the world feels overwhelmingly complex, outrage becomes an easy shortcut. It offers an instant—if temporary—feeling of certainty, control, and moral superiority. But what if our explosive reactions to political and social differences aren't just about the issues themselves, but about how we orient ourselves amid uncertainty?

    In this episode, David sits down with philosopher and educator Dr. Douglas Giles to explore the philosophy of orientation—a practical diagnostic lens for understanding how we make sense of our environment, construct identity, and navigate interpersonal conflict.

    Text me your feedback and leave your contact info if you'd like a reply (this is a one-way text). Thanks, David

    Support the show

    Show Notes:
    https://outrageoverload.net/

    Contact me, David Beckemeyer by email outrageoverload@gmail.com. Follow the show on Instagram @OutrageOverload. We are also on Facebook /OutrageOverload. Check out our Subtstack https://outrageoverload.substack.com

    HOTLINE: 925-552-7885

    Got a Question, comment or just thoughts you'd like to share? Call the O2 hotline and leave a message and you could be featured in an upcoming episode

    If you would like to help the show, you can contribute here. Tell everyone you know about the show. That’s the best way to support it.

    Rate and Review the show on Podchaser: https://www.podchaser.com/OutrageOverload

    Also check out our companion podcasts, This Week in Outrage and Outrage Science Bites.

    Intro music and outro music by Michael Ramir C.

    Many thanks to my co-editor and co-director, Austin Chen.

    Outrage Overload, a Conners Institute podcast, is part of The Democr...

    続きを読む 一部表示
    37 分
  • BONUS - How to Persuade People Who Disagree With You (Hint: It’s Not Facts) - Karin Tamerius
    2026/09/02
    How to Have Better Political Conversations (Even with Your Most Difficult Relatives)


    In this episode of Outrage Overload, host David Beckemeyer sits down with Dr. Karin Tamerius, a political psychiatrist and founder of Smart Politics, a nonprofit that helps progressives communicate persuasively while maintaining respect for differing viewpoints. They discuss how political polarization affects both sides of the spectrum, with a focus on how it may impact progressives more deeply. Dr. Tamerius shares her science-based strategies for fostering healthier political dialogue, building connections, and persuading without imposing beliefs. They also dive into the concept of the "Angry Uncle" and how to navigate those tough, emotionally charged conversations. Whether you're progressive, conservative, or somewhere in between, this episode offers valuable insights on creating productive, respectful conversations in a divided world. Tune in to explore how we can all lower the temperature in political discussions and communicate more effectively across divides.

    Text me your feedback and leave your contact info if you'd like a reply (this is a one-way text). Thanks, David

    Support the show

    Show Notes:
    https://outrageoverload.net/

    Contact me, David Beckemeyer by email outrageoverload@gmail.com. Follow the show on Instagram @OutrageOverload. We are also on Facebook /OutrageOverload. Check out our Subtstack https://outrageoverload.substack.com

    HOTLINE: 925-552-7885

    Got a Question, comment or just thoughts you'd like to share? Call the O2 hotline and leave a message and you could be featured in an upcoming episode

    If you would like to help the show, you can contribute here. Tell everyone you know about the show. That’s the best way to support it.

    Rate and Review the show on Podchaser: https://www.podchaser.com/OutrageOverload

    Also check out our companion podcasts, This Week in Outrage and Outrage Science Bites.

    Intro music and outro music by Michael Ramir C.

    Many thanks to my co-editor and co-director, Austin Chen.

    Outrage Overload, a Conners Institute podcast, is part of The Democr...

    続きを読む 一部表示
    31 分
  • 95. The Legal Glitch That Engineered Our Political Rage – Larry Lessig
    2026/08/26

    Why Overturning Citizens United Isn't the Only Way to Stop Super PACs

    Host David Beckemeyer speaks with Larry Lessig, the Roy L. Furman Professor of Law and Leadership at Harvard Law School. Together, they unpack the hidden legal architecture driving our hyper-polarized landscape and explore why fixing the structural money in politics is a necessary first step toward reining in the outrage machine.

    While the popular narrative blames Citizens United for making unlimited campaign money unstoppable, Lessig reveals that super PACs actually rest on a flawed lower-court decision—SpeechNow.org v. FEC—that conflated independent spending with unlimited contributions. He explains how a voter-approved initiative in Maine capping super PAC contributions at $5,000 is setting up a targeted legal challenge at the Supreme Court that could dismantle super PACs without needing a constitutional amendment.

    Text me your feedback and leave your contact info if you'd like a reply (this is a one-way text). Thanks, David

    Support the show

    Show Notes:
    https://outrageoverload.net/

    Contact me, David Beckemeyer by email outrageoverload@gmail.com. Follow the show on Instagram @OutrageOverload. We are also on Facebook /OutrageOverload. Check out our Subtstack https://outrageoverload.substack.com

    HOTLINE: 925-552-7885

    Got a Question, comment or just thoughts you'd like to share? Call the O2 hotline and leave a message and you could be featured in an upcoming episode

    If you would like to help the show, you can contribute here. Tell everyone you know about the show. That’s the best way to support it.

    Rate and Review the show on Podchaser: https://www.podchaser.com/OutrageOverload

    Also check out our companion podcasts, This Week in Outrage and Outrage Science Bites.

    Intro music and outro music by Michael Ramir C.

    Many thanks to my co-editor and co-director, Austin Chen.

    Outrage Overload, a Conners Institute podcast, is part of The Democr...

    続きを読む 一部表示
    48 分
  • 73. Rethinking Autism Advocacy – Ari Ne’eman
    2026/08/19

    What If Inclusion, Not Normalization, Was the Goal?

    Too often, conversations about autism happen without autistic voices at the table. In this episode, we talk with Ari Ne’eman, Assistant Professor at Harvard and co-founder of the Autistic Self-Advocacy Network, about the real divides in autism advocacy and what a better path forward could look like.

    Ari brings both lived experience and policy expertise, with service under multiple U.S. administrations, to examine how public policy shapes autism services, support, and the future of neurodiversity.

    This conversation challenges common assumptions and points toward values-driven autism advocacy—centered on communication, inclusion, and real quality of life.

    Original Air date: 10/1/2026

    Text me your feedback and leave your contact info if you'd like a reply (this is a one-way text). Thanks, David

    Support the show

    Show Notes:
    https://outrageoverload.net/

    Contact me, David Beckemeyer by email outrageoverload@gmail.com. Follow the show on Instagram @OutrageOverload. We are also on Facebook /OutrageOverload. Check out our Subtstack https://outrageoverload.substack.com

    HOTLINE: 925-552-7885

    Got a Question, comment or just thoughts you'd like to share? Call the O2 hotline and leave a message and you could be featured in an upcoming episode

    If you would like to help the show, you can contribute here. Tell everyone you know about the show. That’s the best way to support it.

    Rate and Review the show on Podchaser: https://www.podchaser.com/OutrageOverload

    Also check out our companion podcasts, This Week in Outrage and Outrage Science Bites.

    Intro music and outro music by Michael Ramir C.

    Many thanks to my co-editor and co-director, Austin Chen.

    Outrage Overload, a Conners Institute podcast, is part of The Democr...

    続きを読む 一部表示
    46 分
  • 94. Making Politicians Accountable to Voters – Ramon Perez
    2026/08/12

    Reimagining Democracy: Using AI and Mobile Tech to Break the Outrage Machine

    Congress currently sits at a near-record low approval rating, yet individual lawmakers are reelected over 90% of the time. Why is our political system so resistant to public accountability?

    In this episode, David Beckemeyer sits down with Ramon Perez, Executive Director of the Digital Democracy Project, to unpack the structural incentives that keep our political system locked in hyper-partisanship and outrage.

    Rather than offering soft "be nicer" solutions, Ramon outlines a direct, technology-driven counter-maneuver: leveraging secure mobile platforms and artificial intelligence to bypass political middlemen, translate complex legalese into plain text, and hold representatives directly accountable to their constituents.

    Text me your feedback and leave your contact info if you'd like a reply (this is a one-way text). Thanks, David

    Support the show

    Show Notes:
    https://outrageoverload.net/

    Contact me, David Beckemeyer by email outrageoverload@gmail.com. Follow the show on Instagram @OutrageOverload. We are also on Facebook /OutrageOverload. Check out our Subtstack https://outrageoverload.substack.com

    HOTLINE: 925-552-7885

    Got a Question, comment or just thoughts you'd like to share? Call the O2 hotline and leave a message and you could be featured in an upcoming episode

    If you would like to help the show, you can contribute here. Tell everyone you know about the show. That’s the best way to support it.

    Rate and Review the show on Podchaser: https://www.podchaser.com/OutrageOverload

    Also check out our companion podcasts, This Week in Outrage and Outrage Science Bites.

    Intro music and outro music by Michael Ramir C.

    Many thanks to my co-editor and co-director, Austin Chen.

    Outrage Overload, a Conners Institute podcast, is part of The Democr...

    続きを読む 一部表示
    28 分
  • 93. The Structural Battle for the DOJ – Alex Lovit
    2026/07/29

    In February 2025, we explored how an expanding executive branch was stretching traditional boundaries. In this follow-up episode, we turn our attention to the primary institutional battleground of 2026: The Department of Justice (DOJ).

    The long-standing post-Watergate norm that the DOJ should operate independently from presidential control has been explicitly rejected by the current administration. Asserting total constitutional authority over all executive branch agencies under Article II, the administration argues that an independent DOJ is a constitutional myth.

    To break down the structural reality behind the headlines—including the rapid dismissal of indictments against political allies, the targeting of opponents, and mass civil service purges—we sit down with historian Alex Lovit, host of The Context (a sister podcast in The Democracy Group network). Together, we place the crisis of 2026 into historical perspective, tracing the design flaws and structural vulnerabilities of the DOJ from its founding in 1870 to the present day.

    Text me your feedback and leave your contact info if you'd like a reply (this is a one-way text). Thanks, David

    Support the show

    Show Notes:
    https://outrageoverload.net/

    Contact me, David Beckemeyer by email outrageoverload@gmail.com. Follow the show on Instagram @OutrageOverload. We are also on Facebook /OutrageOverload. Check out our Subtstack https://outrageoverload.substack.com

    HOTLINE: 925-552-7885

    Got a Question, comment or just thoughts you'd like to share? Call the O2 hotline and leave a message and you could be featured in an upcoming episode

    If you would like to help the show, you can contribute here. Tell everyone you know about the show. That’s the best way to support it.

    Rate and Review the show on Podchaser: https://www.podchaser.com/OutrageOverload

    Also check out our companion podcasts, This Week in Outrage and Outrage Science Bites.

    Intro music and outro music by Michael Ramir C.

    Many thanks to my co-editor and co-director, Austin Chen.

    Outrage Overload, a Conners Institute podcast, is part of The Democr...

    続きを読む 一部表示
    52 分