North in the Basement: The Architecture of Iran-Contra
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
ご購入は五十タイトルがカートに入っている場合のみです。
カートに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
-
ナレーター:
-
著者:
(00:00:49) Two Illegal Things at Once
(00:02:07) The Justifications
(00:03:36) Oliver North and the Architecture of the Operation
(00:04:46) Reagan's Defense
(00:06:06) Fawn Hall and the Shredder
(00:07:12) The Tower Commission
(00:08:24) The 1987 Hearings
(00:10:01) Convictions, Reversals, and Pardons
(00:11:40) What It Exposed
(00:13:25) The Weight of It
In the fall of 1986, a Marine lieutenant colonel named Oliver North was working late in the basement of the Old Executive Office Building. He wasn't commanding troops — he was orchestrating a covert scheme that would become the biggest political scandal since Watergate: selling weapons to Iran and funneling the profits to Nicaraguan Contras, both in direct violation of federal law.
This episode traces the architecture of Iran-Contra from its operational core outward. North wasn't the most senior figure involved — National Security Advisor John Poindexter, former NSA Robert McFarlane, and CIA Director William Casey all played roles — but he was the engine. Working with arms dealers, Israeli intermediaries, and a network of private operatives, North built a shadow foreign policy apparatus that bypassed Congress entirely.
The operation rested on two illegal foundations simultaneously. The Boland Amendment explicitly prohibited U.S. military aid to the Contras. A separate arms embargo barred any weapons transfers to Iran under Ayatollah Khomeini. North's scheme violated both at once, with arms sales to Tehran financing the Contra supply chain.
When the operation became public in November 1986, President Reagan's defence was simple and consistent: he didn't remember. His acknowledgment of broad policy goals — improving relations with Iran, supporting the Contras — sat uncomfortably alongside his claimed ignorance of the specific mechanics. It's a defence that historians and legal scholars continue to dispute today.
This episode examines how the scheme was justified, who built it, and how the question of presidential knowledge cut to the very heart of constitutional separation of powers.
This episode includes AI-generated content.
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
まだレビューはありません