Normative Underpinnings of Questionable Research Practices
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
Normative Underpinnings of Questionable Research Practices
-
ナレーター：
-
著者：
このコンテンツについて
Where Do We Draw the Line? Rethinking Questionable Research Practices
In a world where research integrity is more critical than ever, the greatest threat to science may not be outright fraud—but the grey area in between.
Our study takes a bold step beyond simply listing questionable research practices (QRPs) by asking a deeper, more pressing question: when does a practice become questionable in the first place? Using the theory of communicative action, we explore the normative foundations of QRPs—where justifiability meets judgment—and reveal why individual decisions can’t be fully understood outside their collective context.
We introduce a new framework to help scholars, institutions, and policymakers assess when research behaviors cross the line from acceptable to unacceptable. This isn't just about identifying bad actors—it's about building a shared foundation for stronger scientific standards and higher-quality research.
It’s time to move beyond compliance and toward collective responsibility.