『Nirvana: What Did the Ancient Teachers Actually Mean by Enlightenment?』のカバーアート

Nirvana: What Did the Ancient Teachers Actually Mean by Enlightenment?

Nirvana: What Did the Ancient Teachers Actually Mean by Enlightenment?

無料で聴く

ポッドキャストの詳細を見る

【Amazonプライム会員限定】今ならプレミアムプランが4か月 月額99円。

10月19日まで。※適用条件あり

This episode begins in an early Buddhist dialogue at the Deer Park, where Sāriputta asks Mahā Koṭṭhita what can be said about an awakened one after death. From that unanswered exchange, the story moves backward through the canonical account of Siddhartha Gautama’s search: leaving home, studying with Āḷāra Kālāma and Uddaka Rāmaputta, rejecting extreme asceticism, awakening, hesitating to teach, and defining cessation as the fading and letting go of craving. The episode distinguishes nirvāṇa, the Sanskrit term, from nibbāna, the Pāli term, and separates liberation during life from final parinirvana at death. It follows early texts such as the Ariyapariyesana Sutta, Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta, Fire Sermon, Anurādha dialogue, Mahāparinibbāna Sutta, Udāna, and Itivuttaka, then traces later interpretation through Theravāda systematization, Nāgārjuna’s Madhyamaka, Buddha-nature literature, Chan and Zen reception, and modern translations. Competing models are treated fairly: nirvana as cessation of greed, hatred, delusion, craving, and rebirth; nirvana as the unconditioned or deathless; nirvana as a refusal to turn liberation into an object; and modern psychological readings. The final judgment remains with the listener.


This podcast uses artificial intelligence in its research, writing, production, and narration. Episodes are editorially reviewed before publication.


#AncientSpiritualKnowledge #AncientSpiritualTeachingsComparativeBuddhistPhil #Nirvana #Enlightenment #Buddhism


YES OR NO: Does early Buddhist evidence define nirvana primarily as cessation of craving rather than an afterlife destination??????

adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
まだレビューはありません