Netflix: A Tale of Two Flink Autoscalers
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
-
ナレーター:
-
著者:
Jordan and Riley compare the two autoscalers Netflix has run across its 30,000+ Apache Flink jobs — a 2019 Mantis-based scaler that reasoned over coarse cluster metrics and moved a single knob (total TaskManager count), versus the Apache Flink community autoscaler that reasons from inside the job using True Processing Rate to size each operator independently. They cover why Netflix is converging on the open-source option, the engineering gaps it had to close at scale (metric collection at high parallelism, preserving forward chaining, respecting sink limits), the safety checks in the "realizer," and a 58% (~$1.1M/yr) compute cut for one team. This is original commentary, not a reproduction of the original post.
Source: "A Tale of Two Flink Autoscalers" by Samuel Yeboah, Francesco Di Chiara, and Mingliang Liu, Netflix Tech Blog, Aug 21 2026 — https://netflixtechblog.com/a-tale-of-two-flink-autoscalers-e9f6a1b1492b