『Musings on Mysteries & the Mythical Matrix』のカバーアート

Musings on Mysteries & the Mythical Matrix

Musings on Mysteries & the Mythical Matrix

著者： M Quad
無料で聴く

【Amazonプライム会員限定】今ならプレミアムプランが4か月 月額99円。

10月19日まで。※適用条件あり
Musings on Mysteries and the Mythical Matrix (M^4, “M Quad”, or M4D for short) is a podcasting and content creation platform that is dedicated to exploring the ancient, mysterious, and unknown through logic, reason, science, and the Socratic method. Whether your interest is Atlantis, Zeus, or anything in between, we tackle it all! Our goal is to unravel the interdimensional and mythical matrix of ancient stories, and expose how these may be connected to modern mysteries and science. We approach our overall study through a unique lens of theorizing the spiritual realm exists, and is the 4th dimension as indicated by mathematical geometry.

The podcast is for: mystery seekers, musers, conspiracy theorists, interdimensional philosophers, and seekers of truth.

The show is NOT for those who enjoy the comfort of their confirmation bias and logical fallacies: you will get triggered!Copyright M Quad スピリチュアリティ 哲学 社会科学
エピソード
  • Episode 074 - The Secret of Gilgamesh's Weapons | WeaponsTalk Swapcast

    Episode 074 - The Secret of Gilgamesh's Weapons | WeaponsTalk Swapcast
    2026/09/09
    What secrets are hidden in the cuneiform descriptions of Gilgamesh’s weapons?In this episode of Musings on Mysteries and the Mythical Matrix, we team up with Andrew from WeaponsTalk Podcast to explore the legendary weapons of Gilgamesh through ancient texts, weapon history, Sumerian, Akkadian, and Bronze Age archaeology.We break down the weapons mentioned in the Sumerian and Akkadian traditions, including axes, daggers, swords, hatchets, and possibly even bows or javelins. From Sumerian terms like aga-silig, giri₂, and a₂-aš-gar, to Akkadian words like kakkum, ḫaṣṣinnu, and patru, we examine what these ancient terms may actually tell us about Gilgamesh’s arsenal.Then we compare those weapons to real Bronze Age examples, including the famous Arslantepe swords, early stabbing blades, axes as both tools and weapons, and the difference between cutting, thrusting, and battlefield practicality.But the biggest twist comes from the texts themselves: the weights.Some traditions describe Gilgamesh’s weapons as weighing far beyond anything a normal human could use. In the Akkadian material, the axes and daggers are described in talents. In the Sumerian tradition, the axe Gilgamesh uses against the Bull of Heaven is described as weighing seven talents: roughly 462 pounds.So what do we do with that?Was this classic mythological exaggeration? Did later Babylonian scribes make an impossible detail more believable? Or does this reveal something deeper about how ancient people remembered heroes, weapons, and power?Finally, we apply the Gyges Principle: when myth and history collide, the line between “impossible legend” and “ancient memory” is often shaped by the assumptions we bring to the evidence.M Quad Links Support the show! https://buymeacoffee.com/m.quad.musingsDiscord server invite: https://discord.gg/yzfH3KEjY9Sources Assyrian Languages. (n.d.). Akkadian dictionary. Retrieved from https://www.assyrianlanguages.org/akkadian/index_en.php Black, J., Cunningham, G., Robson, E., & Zólyomi, G. (2006). The literature of ancient Sumer. Oxford University Press. Cuneiform Digital Library Initiative. (n.d.). Gilgamesh II 001–003 CBS 07771 (P262784). Retrieved from https://cdli.earth/artifacts/262784 Drews, R. (1995). The end of the Bronze Age: Changes in warfare and the catastrophe ca. 1200 B.C. Princeton University Press. George, A. R. (Trans.). (2003). The Epic of Gilgamesh. Penguin Classics. Hayes, J. L. (2019). A manual of Sumerian grammar and texts (3rd ed.). Undena Publications. Huehnergard, J. (2011). A grammar of Akkadian (3rd ed.). Brill. Jastrow, M., Jr., & Clay, A. T. (1920). An Old Babylonian version of the Gilgamesh Epic. Project Gutenberg. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/11000/11000-h/11000-h.htm Kovacs, M. G. (Trans.). (1998). The Epic of Gilgamesh. Uruk-Warka Collection. https://uruk-warka.dk/Gilgamish/The%20Epic%20of%20Gilgamesh.pdf Schnädelbach, D. (n.d.). The weight system of the Babylonian talent. Academia.edu. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/49576750/The_weight_system_of_the_Babylonian_talent The Electronic Text Corpus of Sumerian Literature. (n.d.). Gilgameš and Ḫuwawa Version A. University of Oxford. https://etcsl.orinst.ox.ac.uk/cgi-bin/etcsl.cgi?text=t.1.8.1.5&display=Crit&charenc=gcirc&lineid=t1815.p1#t1815.p1 The Electronic Text Corpus of Sumerian Literature. (n.d.). Gilgamesh and Huwawa, Version B. University of Oxford. https://etcsl.orinst.ox.ac.uk/section1/tr18151.htm The Electronic Text Corpus of Sumerian Literature. (n.d.). Gilgameš and the bull of heaven. University of Oxford. https://etcsl.orinst.ox.ac.uk/cgi-bin/etcsl.cgi?text=t.1.8.1.2&display=Crit&charenc=gcirc&lineid=t1812.p21#t1812.p21
    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 32 分
  • Episode 073 - The Gyges Principle: When Myth & History Collide

    Episode 073 - The Gyges Principle: When Myth & History Collide
    2026/08/31
    Is the Ring of Gyges just a myth… or does it reveal how difficult it can be to separate mythology from history?

    In this episode of Musings on Mysteries and the Mythical Matrix, we break down the story of Gyges of Lydia: a man remembered in both myth and history as someone who rose to power through secrecy, betrayal, and the death of a king.

    We explore Plato’s version of Gyges, where a shepherd discovers a mysterious ring on a dead giant and learns that it can turn him invisible. With this power, he seduces the queen, kills the king, and takes the throne.

    Then we turn to Herodotus’ historical account, where Gyges is a bodyguard of King Kandaules, forced into a dishonorable situation involving the queen, trapped by her ultimatum, and ultimately pushed into killing the king and becoming ruler of Lydia.

    From there, we ask the big question: Are Plato and Herodotus telling two completely different stories… or are they preserving different versions of the same ancient event?

    We examine the real historical Gyges of Lydia, his connection to Ashurbanipal, the timeline between Herodotus and Plato, the role of local myth, and how ancient traditions can preserve history while also reshaping it through symbolism, philosophy, and cultural memory.

    And finally, we introduce the Gyges Principle: the idea that the line between myth and history is not always fixed. Sometimes what we call “myth” or “history” depends less on the evidence itself and more on the assumptions we bring to the story.

    M Quad Links
    Support the show! https://buymeacoffee.com/m.quad.musings
    Discord server invite: https://discord.gg/yzfH3KEjY9

    References
    Jeffers, J., & Novotny, J. (2023). The royal inscriptions of Ashurbanipal (668–631 BC), Aššur-etel-ilāni (630–627 BC), and Sîn-šarra-iškun (626–612 BC), kings of Assyria, part 2 (Royal Inscriptions of the Neo-Assyrian Period, Vol. 5/2). Eisenbrauns. https://oracc.museum.upenn.edu/rinap/downloads/0RINAP5_2_final.pdf
    Herodotus. (2009). The landmark Herodotus: The histories (R. B. Strassler, Ed.; A. L. Purvis, Trans.). Anchor Books.
    Plato. (n.d.). The Republic (B. Jowett, Trans.). Project Gutenberg. https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/1497
    続きを読む 一部表示
    54 分
  • Episode 072 - Ugaritic Myth: The Curse of Kirta

    Episode 072 - Ugaritic Myth: The Curse of Kirta
    2026/07/15
    Is the Kirta Epic connected to the Bible… or are we seeing the shared cultural world of the ancient Near East?

    In this episode of Musings on Mysteries and the Mythical Matrix, we break down the Ugaritic myth of Kirta, also known as Keret: a Bronze Age king who loses his family, receives a divine command from El, restores his dynasty, breaks a vow, falls under judgment, and is ultimately restored.

    We explore the story’s major themes: divine dreams, royal succession, broken vows, sickness, restoration, and El’s authority over the other gods.

    We also tackle the big comparative question: Do the parallels between Kirta and biblical figures like Job, David, and Solomon prove that the Bible repurposed Ugaritic myth… or do they reveal common themes and challenges across the ancient Near Eastern world?

    From there, we examine Ugaritic vows, textual dating assumptions, possible YW references, divine tents, clay creation imagery, and the significance of El intervening over Asherah’s judgment.

    And finally, we ask whether the Kirta myth points to ordinary polytheism… or something closer to a universal monolatry framework where one high god still has the final say.

    M Quad Links
    Support the show! https://buymeacoffee.com/m.quad.musings
    Discord server invite: https://discord.gg/yzfH3KEjY9

    References
    Coogan, M. D. (1978). Stories from ancient Canaan. Westminster John Knox Press.

    Parker, S. B. (Ed.). (1997). Ugaritic narrative poetry. Scholars Press.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    49 分
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
まだレビューはありません