エピソード

  • - [x] E3 cubierto: head fake - Mirando sues not knowing MacKay existed

    - [x] E3 cubierto: head fake - Mirando sues not knowing MacKay existed
    2026/09/10
    - [x] E3 cubierto: head fake - Mirando sues not knowing MacKay existed

    A young man in Seoul bled three and a half liters after a cosmetic jawline operation while nursing staff mopped the operating room floor more than a dozen times and the advertised surgeon was absent; how did security camera footage later reveal the truth, and what does that silence hide about decades-long practices in surgery? This episode connects a 2016 death in Seoul to a 1975 New York hip operation that lasted ten hours with an uncredentialed company manager at the table - could these be symptoms of the same hidden system?

    In this episode, we tell the parallel stories recorded in hospital corridors and security footage: the case of Kwon Dae-hee at Center A clinic in Seoul and the 1975 operation of Franklin Mirando in New York, and we trace the questions that tie them together - who was actually performing surgery, and why were they allowed into the operating room?

    Person: Kwon Dae-hee
    Date: October 2016
    Location: Center A clinic, Seoul
    Person: Franklin Mirando
    Date: 1975

    - Kwon Dae-hee was 24 years old when he underwent a jawline procedure in 2016.
    - Kwon lost 3.5 liters of blood during or after the procedure; the official report recorded less than one-third of that amount.
    - The operating room floor at Center A clinic was mopped more than a dozen times on the day of Kwon’s surgery.
    - Franklin Mirando, age 43 in 1975, had a hip replacement that lasted ten hours.
    - William MacKay, a prosthetics company general sales manager with no medical training, spent an additional 3.5 hours working on Mirando’s hip after leaving and returning.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    28 分
  • The Shot That Shouldn't Have Killed a President - Doctors Did

    The Shot That Shouldn't Have Killed a President - Doctors Did
    2026/09/09
    The Shot That Shouldn't Have Killed a President - Doctors Did

    A presidential wound that doctors called survivable nonetheless produced death after seventy-nine days - and the bullet never struck the spinal cord. This episode tells how a $14 .442 Webley British Bulldog, a wood grip chosen because ivory cost one dollar more, and a series of medical choices turned a single shot into one of the most documented medical catastrophes in American history. How did the physicians' responses change the outcome that seemed obvious in the first hours?

    In this episode, we follow the events from the purchase of the revolver through the shooting at the Baltimore and Potomac Railroad Station and the medical care that followed, tracing how decisions by those around James Abram Garfield shaped the final result. What do the details of the wound, the assassin, and the medical response reveal about why Garfield died?

    Person: James Abram Garfield
    Date: July 2, 1881
    Assassin: Charles Julius Julius
    Weapon: .442 Webley British Bulldog revolver
    Survival interval: 79 days

    - The revolver cost $14 and the killer chose a wood grip because ivory cost $1 more.
    - The bullet entered Garfield's back and lodged behind his pancreas, missing the spinal cord.
    - Every physician who examined Garfield in the first hours declared the wound survivable.
    - Charles Julius was 39 years old and had been banned from the White House waiting room on May 13, 1881.
    - Garfield won the 1880 election by fewer than 2,000 popular votes and was inaugurated March 4, 1881.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    25 分
  • When the OR Floor Needed Mopping: The Hidden Toll of Ghost Surgery

    When the OR Floor Needed Mopping: The Hidden Toll of Ghost Surgery
    2026/09/08
    When the OR Floor Needed Mopping: The Hidden Toll of Ghost Surgery

    The idea that a clinic's operating room needed mopping more than a dozen times is chillingly concrete: CCTV showed repeated blood cleanup while the official record listed just over one liter of blood loss. How did a twenty-two-year-old patient end up under different hands, and what did the footage reveal that the medical report did not?

    In this episode, we follow the case of Kwon Dae-hee and the sequence of events after his jawline procedure at a Seoul cosmetic clinic that led his mother to review CCTV footage frame by frame. We lay out what the footage, the clinic’s staffing practices, and the official report each say - and ask how widespread practices like double-booking and unauthorized substitutes reshape responsibility for surgical outcomes.

    Person: Kwon Dae-hee
    Date: October 2016
    Location: Seoul
    Event: jawline cosmetic surgery
    Status: died seven weeks after procedure

    - The operating room floor had to be mopped more than a dozen times according to CCTV footage.
    - The clinic’s official medical report recorded blood loss during the procedure as just over one liter.
    - Kwon was 22 years old at the time and had not told his family he was having surgery.
    - The surgeon whose name was on the advertising was double-booked; much of the operation was performed by a general doctor and nursing assistants.
    - The Korean Society of Plastic Surgeons estimated about 100,000 patients were subjected to similar substitute-practitioner practices between 2008 and 2014.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    27 分
  • How Doctors Killed a Surviving President: The Garfield Failure

    How Doctors Killed a Surviving President: The Garfield Failure
    2026/09/07
    How Doctors Killed a Surviving President: The Garfield Failure

    A president shot in a crowded train station should have survived; every surgeon since agrees the wound was survivable, yet James Garfield died after seventy-nine days of public, confident medical care. What went so wrong under the hands of doctors who believed they were saving him?

    In this episode, we trace the moments before and after the shooting, the personal history that brought Garfield to power, and the actions of the man who pulled the trigger, all leading to the central question: once Garfield survived the night, how did he still end up dead?

    Person: James Abram Garfield
    Date: July 2, 1881
    Location: Baltimore and Potomac Railroad Station, Washington
    Assailant: Charles Guiteau
    Weapon: .442 Webley British Bulldog revolver

    - Garfield was inaugurated on March 4, 1881 and had been president fewer than 200 days at the time of the shooting.
    - Garfield was born in November 1831 in Orange Township, Ohio, and graduated from Williams College in 1856.
    - Charles Guiteau arrived at the station at approximately 9:30 AM on July 2, 1881 and had borrowed $15 to buy the gun.
    - Guiteau stopped to have his shoes shined and had prearranged a cab to take him to the police after the shooting.
    - Medical observers agree the bullet wound was survivable, but Garfield died after 79 days of treatment.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    28 分
  • When the Surgeon Killed Patients: Inside "Doctor Death" Duntsch's Trail

    When the Surgeon Killed Patients: Inside "Doctor Death" Duntsch's Trail
    2026/09/06
    When the Surgeon Killed Patients: Inside "Doctor Death" Duntsch's Trail

    Danger hides in credentials: a neurosurgeon trained for 15 years injured 33 of 38 patients in less than two years, permanently maiming 31 and killing 2 on the table. How did Christopher Duntsch, with a 12-page CV and a $600,000 salary, operate across four Dallas-Fort Worth hospitals while colleagues later described him as dangerous - and what let him slip through the system until a criminal conviction in 2017?

    In this episode, we tell the sequence of events, the surgical errors, the colleagues and patients who raised alarms, and the legal outcome that ended with a life sentence; we ask how the medical and legal systems failed until prosecutors secured a conviction, and whether that gap has really been closed.

    Person: Christopher Duntsch Duntsch
    Date: February 20, 2017 (conviction deliberation and verdict)
    Location: Dallas-Fort Worth area
    Event: Neurosurgeon operated in four hospitals and harmed 33 of 38 patients
    Status: Sentenced to life in prison, parole eligibility July 2045

    - 33 of 38 patients were injured by Duntsch in under two years.
    - 31 patients were permanently maimed; 2 died on the operating table.
    - Jury deliberated for four hours to convict him and one hour to sentence him to life.
    - Duntsch was born April 3, 1971, and finished his neurosurgery training in 2010.
    - He earned an MD in 2001 and a PhD in 2002, but falsely claimed a magna cum laude doctorate program from St. Jude that did not exist.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    30 分
  • The Nurse Who Made Monitors Fall Silent: Inside Högel's Ward

    The Nurse Who Made Monitors Fall Silent: Inside Högel's Ward
    2026/09/05
    The Nurse Who Made Monitors Fall Silent: Inside Högel's Ward

    A single shelf held four empty vials of ajmaline in Ward Four of the Delmenhorst Clinic - a cardiac drug powerful enough to stop a heart - and supervisors did nothing. By the time anyone stopped him the death toll had been climbing for six years across two hospitals; how did hospital paperwork and promotions let a nurse accused of killing dozens keep moving through the system?

    In this episode, we lay out the documented sequence of events, personnel actions, and data that followed Niels Högel from ward to ward, and trace how meetings, reports, and a glowing reference letter failed to halt him - what does that official paper trail reveal about institutional responsibility?

    Person: Niels Högel
    Date of birth: December 30, 1976
    Event: Four empty ajmaline vials found in 2004 at Delmenhorst Clinic Ward Four
    Case: Estimated 300 victims, 85 proven in court
    Document: Reference letter dated October 10, 2002 from director of nursing

    - 58% of all resuscitations and patient deaths on Ward Four-Eleven occurred on Högel's shifts (noted in August 2001 meeting).
    - Högel called in sick for three weeks after the August 2001 meeting; only two deaths occurred on the ward during that period.
    - Transfer options after a September 2002 confrontation were resignation with continued pay or reassignment to logistics; no police referral was made.
    - Director of nursing issued an unqualified, positive reference letter for Högel on October 10, 2002.
    - Investigators estimated up to 300 victims across two hospitals and two German cities; 85 deaths were proven in court.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    28 分
  • When the Caregiver Killed: Inside Ward 211's Quiet Murders

    When the Caregiver Killed: Inside Ward 211's Quiet Murders
    2026/09/04
    When the Caregiver Killed: Inside Ward 211's Quiet Murders

    A ward where 58% of resuscitation events and deaths fell to one nurse sounds like a statistical alarm - but in Ward Two-Eleven those numbers met polite explanations and a glowing recommendation instead of handcuffs. How did routine drugs, failing systems, and a young nurse’s need to be needed combine to let more than two hundred people die before anyone stopped him?

    In this episode, we follow the timeline and institutional choices around the cardiac surgery ICU known as Ward Two-Eleven, tracing Niels Högel’s movements between clinics, the drugs he used, and the meetings that failed to stop him. What happened inside those wards, and how did medical systems keep turning while patients continued to die?

    Person: Niels Högel
    Date: 22 June 2005
    Location: Ward Two-Eleven, Klinikum Delmenhorst / Klinikum Oldenburg
    Period: 1999-2005
    Event: First witnessed adjustment of a patient’s syringe pump without an order

    - In 2001 administrators recorded that 58% of all resuscitation events and patient deaths on Ward Two-Eleven occurred during the shifts of a single 24-year-old nurse.
    - On 22 June 2005 a nurse at Klinikum Delmenhorst was seen adjusting a patient’s syringe pump without a doctor’s order or an alarm sounding.
    - Investigators later concluded Niels Högel had killed more than two hundred people over several years.
    - Högel arrived at Oldenburg in 1999 at age 22 after vocational training at Sankt-Willehad Hospital in Wilhelmshaven.
    - Confirmed victims ranged in age from 34 to 96 and included people from Germany, Poland, and Turkey.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    29 分
  • How a Reference Letter Hid a Serial Killer Nurse for Years

    How a Reference Letter Hid a Serial Killer Nurse for Years
    2026/09/03
    How a Reference Letter Hid a Serial Killer Nurse for Years

    Fear of betrayal by those we trust is the first thing that grabs you here: a single signed reference kept a nurse employed after 58% of emergencies on his ward happened during his shifts. The word "reference" appears in official files while four empty vials of ajmaline sat in a break room - so how did that one document let him move and keep killing? What else was hidden behind routine hospital paperwork?

    In this episode, we lay out the sequence of events that moved a nurse from ward to ward, the decisions made inside hospital meetings, and the small but decisive documents and actions that allowed the pattern to continue. We follow the timeline from the August meeting with damning mortality data to the October reference letter - and ask how a single piece of paper changed everything.

    Person: Niels Högel
    Date: June 22, 2005
    Location: Delmenhorst clinic
    Period: 1997-2005
    Event: Reference letter signed October 10, 2002

    - 58% of the emergencies and deaths on Ward 211 occurred during Högel's shifts, presented in an August 2001 meeting.
    - Högel disappeared on sick leave for three weeks after the August 2001 meeting; only two patients died on the ward during that absence.
    - The general director confronted Högel in September 2002 and offered resignation with three months' salary or transfer to logistics; no criminal report was filed.
    - On October 10, 2002, the nursing director at Oldenburg signed a glowing letter of reference that omitted mortality data and the prior confrontation.
    - Four empty vials of ajmaline were found in Högel's break room at Delmenhorst, logged but not followed by disciplinary action.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    26 分