In this special season 1 finale of Maxim EQ, we turn the conversation outward by inviting a listener to join the show.

From the beginning, Maxim EQ was created with the hope that the ideas we explored wouldn’t just be interesting — but would also spark reflection and invite listeners to relate them to their own lives. Well, that’s exactly what happened.

In this episode, our guest Phil Bergren shares how several Season 1 topics resonated deeply with him and ultimately inspired him to step into the conversation. Phil offers thoughtful perspectives on some of our favorite episodes — including Depth Over Frequency, Empathy Is Mutually Beneficial, Welcome the Noise — It Might Carry the Signal, and Perfect Is a Fault, and Fault Lines Change. His reflections didn’t just respond to those ideas — they expanded them, prompting fresh insights and new angles from both Sam and me.

This isn’t a recap. It’s a continuation. It’s proof that meaningful dialogue doesn’t end when the microphones turn off. It carries forward — in how we interpret ideas, challenge assumptions, and apply what resonates to our own experiences.

As we close out the season, this episode captures what Maxim EQ is all about: thoughtful exchange, personal reflection, and the belief that growth happens when ideas move from conversation into real life.

Thanks for listening. We’ll see you next season.

Mike

Share your feedback

In this episode, Sam and I are joined by Jarmal Arnold to explore the idea of Depth Over Frequency—a reflection on what we stand to gain when we slow down, go deeper, and resist the constant pull of surface-level engagement.

In a world optimized for speed, metrics, and endless scrolling, we’re often encouraged to value frequency over meaning: more posts, more hot takes, more noise. But what happens when we choose depth instead? When we prioritize fewer inputs, more substantive conversations, and ideas that take time to unfold? At the same time, the conversation also examines whether frequency is always just about quantity—or if it can hold a different kind of value when approached with intention.

Together, the three unpack how our relationship with information, attention, and output shapes not only what we consume, but how we think, create, and connect. The episode invites listeners to consider where choosing quality over quantity can lead to greater clarity, creativity, and fulfillment.

Whether you’re feeling overwhelmed by information overload, craving more meaningful conversations, or simply curious about what it looks like to live a little less reactively, this discussion offers a calm, grounded perspective—and a reminder that sometimes, less really is more.

As always, thanks for listening and for being part of the Maxim EQ community.

Mike

Share your feedback

In this episode, we explore our first listener-suggested maxim: “Don’t let what you can’t do interfere with what you can do.” The saying is primarily attributed to legendary UCLA basketball coach John Wooden, and its message is as practical as it is timeless.

Sam and I unpack this adage with our guest, Mike Piehl of Somerville, MA, examining how focusing on forward motion—rather than limitations—can unlock progress in work, creativity, and life. The phrase isn’t about ignoring challenges or pretending constraints don’t exist; it’s about refusing to let them become excuses. It’s a reminder that momentum is built by acting on what’s within reach, even when the full path forward is completely clear yet;-).

Given his lifelong practice of resourcefulness across nearly every facet of his life, Mike turned out to be the perfect guest to bring this idea to life, sharing real-world perspective on how doing something often matters more than waiting to do everything.

Postscript: As I wrote this episode summary, I was struck by how relevant this topic is to the very existence of Maxim EQ itself. There were (and still are;-) plenty of things Sam and I didn’t know about podcasting—but we started anyway, we’re learning as we go, and have enjoyed every step of the journey.

Thanks for listening,

Mike

Share your feedback