Should tennis players wear their names and a number on the back of their match shirts?

Leave a comment and check us out at the places below:

Instagram

YouTube

TikTok

X

Threads

Cal & Ross share bold predictions for the tennis world in 2026. The chat includes wild and speculative ideas such as Holger Rune launching a paid subscription service, a potential boxing match between Patrick Mouratoglou and Jo-Wilfried Tsonga, plus the tamer idea of 8 different slam winners across the men's and women's game.

Share your own wild predictions, we want to know!

Leave a comment and check us out at the places below:

Instagram

YouTube

TikTok

X

Threads

Ross and Cal make their predictions for the upcoming tennis season, focusing on the Majors - Australian Open, French Open, Wimbledon, and the US Open.

We'd love to hear your thoughts, leave a comment and check us out at the places below:

Instagram

YouTube

TikTok

X

Threads

Who will emerge as the third top player in men's tennis, alongside Sinner and Alcaraz?

Summary

Ross & Cal discuss the athleticism of Felix Auger-Aliassime and Joao Fonseca, weighing their potential against the backdrop of media hype and actual performance. The conversation highlights the nuances of talent recognition in tennis and the impact of media narratives on player perception.

Takeaways

• The discussion centres around identifying a potential third top player in men's tennis.
• Cal believes Felix Auger-Aliassime is the most athletic player on tour.
• Ross challenges Cal's claim about Felix's athleticism compared to Sinner and Alcaraz.
• The conversation touches on the importance of performance consistency in tennis.
• Media hype can sometimes overshadow genuine talent and potential.
• Joao Fonseca is also mentioned as a contender for the third spot.
• The debate emphasizes the subjective nature of talent evaluation in sports.
• Winning Grand Slams is crucial for establishing oneself as a top player.
• Listeners are encouraged to share their opinions on who will break through.
• The conversation reflects the dynamic nature of tennis and its evolving landscape.

We'd love to hear your thoughts, leave a comment and check us out at the places below:

Instagram

YouTube

TikTok

X

Threads

Is 'Off-Court Coaching' IN or OUT?

Summary

Hosts Cal and Ross P engage in a lively debate about the newly legalised off-court coaching in tennis. They discuss the implications of this change, the visibility of coaching during matches, and the impact on players and the sport as a whole. Both hosts share their perspectives, with Cal advocating for the benefits of coaching while Ross expresses some reservations. The conversation culminates in a consensus on the potential of off-court coaching to enhance the game.

Takeaways

• Off-court coaching is now legal in tennis as of January 2025.
• Cal is a strong advocate for off-court coaching, believing it enhances player performance.
• Ross is more skeptical, citing concerns about its implementation and visibility.
• The hosts discuss the lack of criticism faced by tennis coaches compared to other sports.
• They express a desire to hear more from coaches during matches to understand their strategies.
• Cal argues that the best players should have access to the best coaches, as is the case in other sports.
• Ross acknowledges the traditional view of tennis as a one-on-one sport without external help.
• Both hosts agree that seeing coaching interactions can add excitement to matches.

Is Off-Court Coaching in or out for you?

We'd love to hear your thoughts, leave a comment and check us out at the places below:

Instagram

YouTube

TikTok

X

Threads

PREMIERE EPISODE: THE TENNIS TRIBUNAL

The Loosely Strung team have changed it up - Welcome to The Tennis Tribunal. We debate tennis, you judge.

Summary

Hosts Cal and Ross debate the upcoming exhibition match between Nick Kyrgios and Aryna Sabalenka, exploring the implications of the unique rules and format. They express skepticism about the event's value to tennis, questioning the motivations behind it and its potential impact on the sport's image.

Takeaways

• The exhibition match features unique rules, including a smaller court for Sabalenka.
• Cal and Ross are skeptical about the event's value to tennis.
• The match is seen as a marketing stunt rather than a serious competition.
• There are concerns about the implications for gender equality in sports.
• The hosts question the decision-making of Sabalenka's PR team.
• Kyrgios's lack of recent competitive play raises doubts about the match's legitimacy.
• The event could attract viewers but may not benefit the sport long-term.
• The hosts believe the match is a lose-lose situation for both players.
• There is a desire for more integration between ATP and WTA events.

We'd love to hear your thoughts, leave a comment and check us out at the places below:

Instagram

YouTube

X

TikTok

Chapters

00:00 New Year Greetings and Podcast Introduction

02:26 Reflections on the United Cup and Player Performances

06:11 Upcoming Australian Open and Player Predictions

09:50 Qualifying Rounds and Their Importance

11:37 Deodorant Debate and Personal Insights

11:43 Unusual Flavours and Opinions

14:35 Ranking Teenage Tennis Achievements

27:34 Future Plans and Community Engagement

29:07 LS Outro

In this episode, the hosts celebrate the New Year and discuss various tennis highlights, including the United Cup and player performances. They delve into the Australian Open qualifying rounds, share personal reflections, and rank significant teenage tennis achievements. The conversation also touches on controversial opinions regarding players and the impact of media on athletes.

There's also some random nonsense in there for you to enjoy, as per.