Sal Assante breaks down the Lindsay Clancy trial and verdict — and why he believes the insanity defense has become a dangerous loophole in the American justice system. From postpartum depression claims and mental health treatment to the burden of proof, Sal argues that letting defendants shift responsibility without stronger standards sets a precedent that undermines accountability. He also connects the case to bigger issues: media narratives that deepen division, propaganda from political leaders, and a justice system that often fails to balance mental health realities with public safety. 🔗 Useful Links:Follow on Substack: https://wethepatriots.substack.com/Watch on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@wethepatriots/videosFollow Sal on Social Media:Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/salassante?utm_source=ig_web_button_share_sheet&igsh=ZDNlZDc0MzIxNw==X.com: @Sal_assante4Timestamps:00:00 Intro02:31 Overview of the Lindsay Clancy trial and verdict04:12 Legal analysis of the insanity defense and its flaws07:08 The burden of proof in insanity cases and proposed reforms12:06 Societal and political implications of the case16:52 Media manipulation and societal division20:16 Systemic issues in mental health and justice24:33 Disillusionment with current political leadership26:29 The importance of critical thinking and awareness