Karate Is More Than Striking
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
-
ナレーター:
-
著者:
Send us Fan Mail
Your kata might be hiding throws, clinches, and joint control and you were never told to look for them.
I ask a simple question that can make traditionalists uncomfortable: what if the karate most of us were taught is only part of karate? From there I lay out three ideas rooted in Okinawan martial traditions Te, Tegumi, and Torite and how they reshape the way we interpret kata and bunkai. If you only learned punches, kicks, blocks, and stances, you can still become effective, but you may be missing the context that makes certain movements finally click.
We dig into Togumi as traditional Okinawan wrestling, including the often-overlooked detail that Gichin Funakoshi grew up grappling and throwing with other boys. That single fact raises a powerful training question: if someone understands balance, clinch pressure, and limb control, would they read the same kata movement as “block punch,” or would they see a takedown entry, an off-balance, or a setup?
Then we connect Torite to practical control work grabbing, seizing, posture breaking, restraint, and joint manipulation and revisit hikite as the “pulling hand” that actually does a job. The big takeaway is that real fights don’t separate striking and grappling into neat rounds; Te,Tegumi, and Torite blend into one messy, continuous exchange.
If this sparks an argument in your head, hit play, share it with a training partner, and then subscribe, leave a review, and tell me which kata move you want to re-examine next.