Johnson’s Baby Powder was sold for generations as a symbol of cleanliness, care, and household trust. This episode reconstructs how that familiar talc-based product became the center of decades of asbestos-testing disputes, ovarian-cancer and mesothelioma lawsuits, FDA scrutiny, internal-document battles, product changes, bankruptcy strategy, and proposed mass settlements. Beginning with Darlene Coker’s late-1990s mesothelioma lawsuit and later Reuters reporting on records produced through civil discovery, the episode separates documented history from contested science and civil allegations from legal findings. It traces the geology of talc, the difficulty of detecting trace asbestos, the FDA’s 2019 lot-specific testing result and recall, the difference between ovarian-cancer and asbestos-related disease claims, Johnson & Johnson’s repeated denials, plaintiffs’ arguments, the company’s move away from talc-based Baby Powder, the failed bankruptcy-based resolution attempts, and the settlement and court developments reported in 2026. The focus is accountability: what records show, what remains disputed, and how a trusted consumer brand became one of the largest product-liability battles in modern U.S. history.

This podcast uses artificial intelligence in its research, writing, production, and narration. Episodes are editorially reviewed before publication.

#BannedHistory #CorporateDarkHistoryProductSafetyLitigationInter #JohnsonJohnson #Talc #BabyPowder

YES OR NO: Should Johnson & Johnson have disclosed all contested talc asbestos test results to regulator?s?????