• Did Mormon Stories intentionally copy the Church’s blue “light-rays” branding?
• Does the Church’s evidence really show trademark confusion?
• Did John Dehlin intentionally choose the name Mormon Stories to create confusion—or does the twenty-year history of the podcast tell a very different story?
• Does the evidence support the LDS Church insisting that the lawsuit was “never about the word Mormon”?
• Did the Church abandon brands such as Mormon Tabernacle Choir, Mormon Channel, and Mormon Messages and how does that affect their preserving those trademarks with the USPTO and how might such affect this case?
• Did Church attorneys accurately represent a Mormon Stories guest who supposedly believed the podcast was Church-affiliated?
• Were Mormon Stories’ existing disclaimers really inadequate—and were the Church’s proposed disclaimer requirements as simple as they are now being portrayed?
• Why did David Jordan publicly use BAD MORMON as an example of a name nobody would confuse with the Church when the Church previously opposed Heather Gay’s Bad Mormon trademark on the explicit ground that it would cause confusion?
• And did the Church really avoid asking for damages?

The post John Dehlin Joins Mormonism Live!: LDS Church vs. Mormon Stories — Who’s Telling the Truth? appeared first on Mormon Discussion by Bill Reel.