Ivermectin is back in the headlines, but this episode isn't really about ivermectin.

It's about a deeper problem: how society confuses discoveries with proof, petri dishes with people, and early evidence with established fact. Using ivermectin's journey through parasites, COVID, and now cancer research, we explore what different levels of scientific evidence actually mean—and why most scientific discoveries never survive reality.

The real question isn't whether ivermectin is good or bad.

The real question is: what counts as evidence?

Become a Member at dekyon.io/seanmcclure/science-in-perspective

If you enjoyed this episode and want to go deeper, come find me over at dekyon.io. With a premium membership you get the full Science in Perspective experience: interactive visualizations of the key concepts, a study space to learn the fundamentals behind each episode, and an "Ask an Episode" feature where you can dialogue with an AI about the details and start connecting ideas across the whole show.

There's also notes, transcripts, deep-dive articles, and a community of folks thinking through this stuff alongside you. It's where the episode stops being something you just listened to and becomes something you truly understand. So head to dekyon.io, click on the science in perspective app, and become a member today.