『Innovation in Compliance with Tom Fox』のカバーアート

Innovation in Compliance with Tom Fox

Innovation in Compliance with Tom Fox

著者： Thomas Fox
無料で聴く

概要
 Innovation in compliance brings you interviews with industry leading experts who are changing the way practitioners approach compliance. Host Tom Fox, the Compliance Evangelist and Voice of Compliance is driving the conversation about compliance into the 2020s and beyond with his focus on innovations for the compliance practitioner and the compliance profession. If you want to learn how to bring business solutions to compliance problems to more fully operationalize compliance, this is the podcast for you.Thomas Fox マネジメント マネジメント・リーダーシップ 政治・政府 経済学
エピソード
  • The Salus Blueprint: Episode 3 What Do We Actually Know

    The Salus Blueprint: Episode 3 What Do We Actually Know
    2026/11/04
    What questions might a leader might face on a difficult morning? In this special podcast series, Marc Duncan, Bridgett Lee-Young and Scott Pickett of Salus Solutions, explain one useful idea for a variety of corporate professionals such as corporate risk and compliance leaders, anti-bribery and corruption professionals, and then demonstrate how that idea changes a decision. This podcast is also for police and fire chiefs, emergency managers, finance and operations executives, CEOs, boards, and leaders of commercial, public, and private organizations. Over the next 4 weeks, we will be running this special series. In this Episode 3, we move from reports to decision-grade intelligence. We continue the River Bend scenario to explain how raw reports become actionable intelligence for leaders. The panelists distinguish information from intelligence by emphasizing verification, context, confidence levels, and the need to answer “so what,” including triaging fast-moving inputs during response versus slower mitigation phases. We consider “trust but verify,” using multiple sources and alternatives such as forensic data, open-source information, satellite imagery, and patterns of life when human intelligence is unavailable, while clearly stating what is known, believed, unknown, and what would change the assessment. They stress building trusted relationships before crises, integrating functional areas like legal and accounting into decisions, and recognizing differing board risk tolerances through facilitation and reflective questioning. They also address maintaining credibility when assessments change by issuing complete corrections to all prior recipients. Key Highlights 1. “What changes when a raw report becomes intelligence a decision-maker can responsibly use?” 2. “If three people repeat the same unverified story, have we gained three independent sources?” 3. “How do you assess whether a system interruption is recent, confirmed, relevant to Riverbend, and likely to affect an essential service?” 4. “How do you handle a potential vendor integrity concern without accusing anyone prematurely or compromising a legitimate review?” 5. “What should an intelligence briefing say about confidence, limitations, and missing information?” 6. “When would you call in a technical specialist, an investigator, or a local public-safety partner rather than generalize beyond your expertise?” 7. “What does SalINTEL provide that a search engine, an alert feed, or a dashboard cannot determine on its own?” 8. “What new fact would make you change your mind, and how should that update reach the people who acted on the earlier assessment?” Questions for Our Listeners: Even if the warning is credible, can you show which consequence matters most and whether your people can handle it? Next time we turn understanding into risk and capability priorities. About Salus Solutions: “Salus helps organizations understand what matters, make informed protective decisions, and carry them into action. SalCAPA is the method and coordination environment that connects those steps.” Salus Solutions is the sponsor of this podcast series.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    26 分
  • Why Coverbase, Why Now: Native AI Speed and Evidence-Driven Third-Party Risk Management

    Why Coverbase, Why Now: Native AI Speed and Evidence-Driven Third-Party Risk Management
    2026/11/03
    Innovation comes in many areas and compliance professionals need to not only be ready for it but embrace it. Join Tom Fox, the Voice of Compliance as he visits with top innovative minds, thinkers and creators in the award-winning Innovation in Compliance podcast. In this episode, host Tom welcomes Tom interviews CoverBase newcomers Brian Shaw (GTM leader) and Constantine Malaxos (Head of Alliances) on why they joined in 2026 and what is changing in third-party risk management (TPRM). They talk about Coverbase’s “native AI” technology, rapid innovation, and client impact—moving teams from document chasing and backlogs to faster, evidence-backed risk decisions—while complementing existing procurement, contract, and risk systems with time-to-value in weeks. They discuss persistent program pressures such as too many third parties, too few analysts, demand for immediate answers and the need to separate signal from noise using evidence, not questionnaires, to identify gaps against client-specific requirements. Topics include disclosure-driven “need for speed,” SBOM analysis, continuous monitoring for fast-changing AI risks, and advice to run a proof of concept, avoid “AI-ish” tools, choose trusted partners, and start with the highest-friction hotspot. Key Highlights · Why They Joined CoverBase · Why TPRM Matters Now · Native AI vs AI-ish · ROI and Executive Buy-In · Disclosures and Risk Visibility · Managing Risk Continuously Resources Brian Shaw on LinkedIn Constantine Malaxos on LinkedIn Coverbase Tom Fox Instagram Facebook YouTube Twitter LinkedIn My first work of general non-fiction is now out: Deluge Before Dawn, the story of the 2025 flood in Kerr County Texas which killed 119 people and devastated a county. It is a story of tragedy, heartbreak, survival and resilience. It is available on the following sites: Amazon.com Stoney Creek Publishing Barnes and Noble Texas A&M University Press Bookshop.org Google.Books Walmart Innovation in Compliance was recently honored as the Number 4 podcast in Risk Management by 1,000,000 Podcasts
    続きを読む 一部表示
    31 分
  • The Salus Blueprint: Episode 2 - The Signal Lost Between Departments, Things Go Wrong?

    The Salus Blueprint: Episode 2 - The Signal Lost Between Departments, Things Go Wrong?
    2026/10/29
    What questions might a leader face on a difficult morning? In this special podcast series, Marc Duncan, Bridget Lee-Young, and Scott Pickett of Salus Solutions share one useful idea for corporate professionals, including risk and compliance leaders and anti-bribery and corruption professionals, and show how it changes decision-making. This podcast is also for police and fire chiefs, emergency managers, finance and operations executives, CEOs, boards, and leaders of commercial, public, and private organizations. Over the next 4 weeks, we’ll run this special series. In Episode 2, we explore how to break silos with tripwires and dashboards and how organizations should evaluate and act on third-party and operational warnings, using repeated contractor communication failures as a potential red flag. We emphasize forensic assessment to determine whether issues are human, process, or technical, and the importance of timely, credible information and formalizing informal communication channels. This podcast highlights that third parties are often the highest risk and that companies must perform and test vendor due diligence beyond tabletop exercises, distinguishing mistakes from potentially criminal conduct through evidence, paper trails, and investigative techniques. Salus describes a multidisciplinary approach that integrates operational, financial, legal, and supply-chain risks; documents findings for defensibility; and helps leaders interpret data through predefined triggers/tripwires and business rules. They also address board oversight needs through dashboards, common operating pictures, and framing updates as confirmed, validating, and unknown, previewing the next episode on separating credible warnings from rumors. Key highlights: 1. “A staff member says the contractor’s communications system has failed twice. What makes that report useful rather than a vague complaint? ” 2. “What minimum context do you seek: time, place, affected service, source, what was observed, what was inferred, and who already knows? ” 3. “What is the difference between a report of an irregular vendor request and an allegation of bribery? How do we avoid prejudging it? ” 4. “What happens when operations knows of an interruption, compliance knows of a vendor concern, and emergency management knows a storm is coming, but no one sees all three?” 5. “Who should see what information, and how does an organization protect confidentiality while connecting the right people? ” 6. “What does SalCAPA do to help people exchange observations, requests, records, and status? What must a human still decide? ” 7. “What should a leader do when a report is incomplete but potentially consequential? ” Questions for Our Listeners: Write down one current concern, capture who reported what, when, the potential effect, and the next person responsible for checking it. Could your organization tell the difference between a credible warning and a convincing rumor before making a costly or dangerous decision? Next time, we show how information becomes qualified intelligence. About Salus Solutions: “Salus helps organizations understand what matters, make informed protective decisions, and carry them into action. SalCAPA is the method and coordination environment that connects those steps.”
    続きを読む 一部表示
    24 分
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
まだレビューはありません