『Lanterns Fans Are Having the Wrong Argument About John Stewart's Parents #lanterns』のカバーアート

Lanterns Fans Are Having the Wrong Argument About John Stewart's Parents #lanterns

Lanterns Fans Are Having the Wrong Argument About John Stewart's Parents #lanterns

無料で聴く

ポッドキャストの詳細を見る

【Amazonプライム会員限定】今ならプレミアムプランが4か月 月額99円。

10月19日まで。※適用条件あり
Lanterns episode 3 John Stewart parents Monday I said John Stewart's parents were not the villains. My own comment section came back with 1,681 likes on one reply and told me I had the wrong word. So this one opens with the correction: what they did to that boy was abuse, and it was never malicious, and both of those are true at the same time. Then it says the thing that is going to annoy some of you, which is that the abuse argument is the wrong argument, and the whole internet ran straight into it while the actual hour walked right past us. John Stewart is a man built from fear. He is not fearless, he is apathetic, and the Know-It-All Nation had that read before I did. They just had a different word on it. The idea that the Guardians are quietly building a Manhunter out of a human being and calling it a Green Lantern exists in exactly one place right now, and it is my comment section. I put the producer hat on for why an eight episode mystery builds its hero this way in hour three, and take a correction of my own on what the show has and has not shown us about Hal. Three of you called this episode before it aired, on Friday's video, and I put all three on screen with the timestamps. And for the first time, the members of this channel scored the episode beside me. My Know-It-All Index for Lanterns episode 3 is an 8. The Nation Score is on the board. Inside this file: The word. Abusive, not malicious, and why those are two different words with two different jobs. What it cost the parents, on screen, that the argument keeps skipping. Two lines and a whole hour. The puppet episode all over again: everybody arguing about the fuse while the hour goes by. Built from fear. The Nation's obedience thread, from "doesn't need a Why" to "Good Lanterns follow orders," and the word that ties it together. The producer hat. Why an eight episode mystery builds its hero this way in hour three, and what making Bernadette a person buys the back half. The lens. Why the third episode had to be the third episode, Hal's missing side, and the two lines the internet cannot stop talking about, taken as a scene instead of a grievance. What you had before the show did. Three cold calls from Friday, 48 hours early, one of them with zero likes. The Nation Score. The first member ballot, the number, and one member's note I would not add a word to. Subscribe for more Lanterns and DC breakdowns: https://www.youtube.com/@arealknowitall?sub_confirmation=1 Members: your ballot is at knowitallnation.com/vote/yourhandle TIMECODES: 00:00 - Eleven likes, buried under 1,800 02:58 - 1,681 likes and my own reply under it 04:13 - The wrong argument 05:27 - A man built from fear 06:41 - Courage would look different 08:25 - Villain origin story 09:44 - A lesson is coming 10:46 - Why the third episode is the third episode 11:43 - We don't have Hal's side 13:23 - Two women in a house 14:13 - Hal Jordan, and one caveat on the record 16:52 - The Nation Score 17:35 - One member's note 19:56 - Your job before Sunday
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
まだレビューはありません