『Fashionably IP』のカバーアート

Fashionably IP

Fashionably IP

著者: HGF
無料で聴く

【Amazonプライム会員限定】今ならプレミアムプランが4か月 月額99円。

10月19日まで。※適用条件あり
The FashionablyIP podcast is a look at important and hot topics in the world of fashion and intellectual property. In the podcast, we review the latest intellectual property issues in fashion or discuss matters of IP which have impacted the world of fashion for years and have come up again and again. The podcast will consist of interviews, opinion pieces and case law discussions.The information in this podcast is not legal advice. If you have any questions concerning the issues raised please contact Rebecca Field at rfield@hgf.com or Lee Curtis at lcurtis@hgf.com.© 2026 Fashionably IP アート ファッション・テキスタイル マーケティング マーケティング・セールス 経済学 装飾美術および設計
エピソード
  • A potted history of the IP cases associated with the famous Crocs clog
    2026/09/17

    Overview:

    Rebecca Field and Lee Curtis discuss the famous Crocs clog, when it was launched, why it became so successful and some of the intellectual property issues and cases associated with the famous clog.

    Timestamps:

    • 1:44 - History of the development and launch of the well Crocs sandal or clog
    • 3:18 - The first one concerns trade mark law and is a relatively recent case in the UK, is it not
    • 6:45 - What was the Hearing Officer’s reasoning of this point?
    • 10:20 - Has design protection impacts the world of the Crocs clog?
    続きを読む 一部表示
    17 分
  • Social media influencers and liability in the world of fashion: The Georgia Aldridge case
    2026/08/13

    Overview:

    Rebecca Field and Lee Curtis interview Theo Barclay of 4 New Square on the recent IPEC case of Fendi Italia SRL, Loewe S.A., Christian Dior Couture S.A, Celine S.A and LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE against Rolo Fashion Limited and Georgia Aldridge regarding the sale of non-genuine branded fashion products by the social media influencer Georgia Aldridge. We delve into the facts of the case, how the enquiry as to damages was made, and some practical tips for brand owners and, indeed, influencers in the world of fashion social media influencing.

    Timestamps:

    • 2:39 facts of that case and the issues it dealt with
    • 7:18: how the court made that assessment in this case and some of the principles they applied?
    • 15:01 Is that a fair assessment of the judge’s position or is it more subtle than that? Should brand owners be at all concerned by such a finding?
    • 17:18 She seemed to be directly promoting products she had full knowledge were not genuine and in contrast many third-party social media influencers did not have a particularly arm’s length relationship with the promoted product. Is that a correct assessment?
    • 18:22 Are there means by which an influencer can reduce their liability in such situations?
    続きを読む 一部表示
    23 分
  • When is a design considered new and having individual character under UK and EU Design law?
    2026/07/16

    Overview:

    Rebecca Field and Lee Curtis discuss when EU Registered and Unregistered Designs and UK Supplemental Unregistered Design Rights are considered to be new and to have individual character. These are important concepts when considering the validity of such rights. Rebecca and Lee apply those concepts to two fashion IP cases.

    Timestamps:

    • 2:21 - Can you explain what is meant by ‘new’ under UK and EU design law?
    • 3:58 - EU registered and unregistered design rights
    • 8:38 - Fashion cases
    • 11:28 - Is there another fashion case of interest to you, Rebecca, which illustrates some of the points made in this podcast so far?


    続きを読む 一部表示
    15 分
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
まだレビューはありません