Episode #71: How Google Ranks Pages
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
-
ナレーター:
-
著者:
Send us Fan Mail
For 25 years, an entire industry has believed that somewhere inside Google is a formula — and if you could just find it, you'd win. Sworn testimony from Google's federal antitrust trial says otherwise.
Google's own Search VP testified under oath about a system called Navboost — one that tracks how real people behave toward a search result (clicks, hovers, scrolls, return visits) and holds that data for thirteen months to keep adjusting rankings. There's no shortcut around thirteen months of real human approval.
A separate survey of 1,000 marketers shows the same principle at work in AI search: citations are spread across nine content formats, with no single type dominating. Listicles lead at 22%, but comparison and alternative pages — the content type that shows up at the highest-intent moment in the buyer's journey — capture just 2.5% of citations, the lowest share of any format.
In this data-only episode, Jeff Payne connects the two findings into one lesson: both search and AI reward sustained, real usefulness across multiple formats — not a trick, and not a single-format bet.