In this episode Sandi Lyn examines automated license plate reader systems like Flock Safety, and the ways the technology can be misused by law enforcement, private organizations, and homeowners associations. It opens with the case of former police chief Michael Steffman, who allegedly searched the license plates of his ex-girlfriend and her daughter roughly 600 times over a year. The episode explains how Flock has expanded into a nationwide network of more than 120,000 cameras, while selling access not only to police departments but also to HOAs, apartment complexes, commercial landlords, and developers. Reported cases include officers using the system to stalk romantic partners, databases being used for improper and potentially illegal investigations, and audit systems failing to prevent the very abuses they were supposed to catch.

The episode then focuses on the consequences not of abuse, but of inaccurate automated alerts and the broader question of whether surveillance technology produces enough public-safety benefit to justify its risks. Multiple incidents are described in which Flock or similar systems allegedly misread license plates or relied on incorrect database information, resulting in armed traffic stops, arrests, and other serious consequences. The episode also discusses a Texas search involving a woman who had allegedly undergone an abortion, as well as concerns about immigration-related searches of Illinois cameras. Counterexamples are presented through research suggesting fixed license plate readers were associated with an approximately 11% reduction in vehicle theft and faster recovery of stolen vehicles, while Flock cites additional research claiming much larger crime-solving benefits. The discussion emphasizes that misconduct involving police databases predates Flock, while acknowledging that automated audit logs can create a digital trail for identifying misuse.

The final section focuses specifically on real estate, where Flock cameras installed by HOAs can become an overlooked issue for buyers and agents. A Minneapolis-area buyer reportedly canceled a home walkthrough after discovering cameras at the neighborhood entrance and pool, raising questions about who controls the data, how long it is retained, and whether it can be used to issue fines. The episode notes that traditional HOA disclosures generally do not specifically address private surveillance systems and recommends that agents investigate camera locations, obtain HOA contracts, determine who can access data and how long it is retained, and understand whether the association can impose penalties based on surveillance data. Agents are encouraged to document what they discover and disclose relevant information according to applicable state law, while recognizing that crowdsourced camera maps can be incomplete or inaccurate. The episode closes by comparing the power of a police login with the access potentially held by an HOA board member: the system produces information, but does not inherently distinguish between guilty and innocent people.

00:00 — The Flock Investigation Begins

03:58 — Police Misuse the System

10:42 — When Flock Gets It Wrong

17:58 — The Abortion Search

23:28 — The Case for Surveillance

30:28 — Flock Comes to HOAs

37:18 — The Real Estate Problem

42:48 — What Agents Should Investigate

49:12 — All You Need Is a Login

Want to send us a juicy true crime story to cover? Follow and DM us:

Instagram

https://www.instagram.com/truecrimeinrealestate/

YouTube

https://www.youtube.com/@TrueCrimeinRealEstate