Today’s episode examines the 2012 murder of Irasema Chavez in Arlington, Texas, where she was found stabbed more than 100 times inside her apartment. Surveillance footage captured a hooded figure entering after Chavez opened the door, but the video was too low quality to identify the person. Investigators found a single drop of female blood on a bedroom TV stand that did not belong to Chavez, but the DNA produced no CODIS match. A stolen television, lack of forced entry, and the brutality of the killing suggested Chavez knew her attacker, while an early tip reportedly pointed investigators toward a close friend and her allegedly jealous husband. Police visited their home but after no one answered, they never followed up, and the case remained cold for 14 years.

In 2024, Arlington investigators brought the case to the FBI's investigative genetic genealogy program, which searches publicly accessible genealogy databases for relatives of an unknown DNA contributor and builds family trees to identify potential suspects. That investigation eventually pointed to Mayra Velasquez, a licensed North Texas real estate agent. Rather than immediately seek a sample that might alert her, detectives recovered a discarded plastic fork after following her to a restaurant. According to police, DNA from the fork matched the blood found at the crime scene. Velasquez was arrested in July 2026 and charged with capital murder, but she pleaded not guilty and was released on $450,000 bond shortly after.

Sandi Lyn stresses that the DNA match does not by itself prove Velasquez committed the murder. Her attorneys argue that the DNA only establishes that she had been inside the apartment, which would not be unusual because the two women were friends. They also challenge the condition and timing of the blood drop seeming fresh hours after the murder took place, the surveillance video's apparent depiction of a man, and the lack of an established motive. The case becomes a broader discussion of how real estate licensing and background checks can create an illusion of safety: records can reveal what someone has previously been caught doing, but cannot establish what an otherwise clean-recorded person is capable of doing or “gotten away with” doing . The episode ultimately leaves the question of Velasquez's guilt to the evidence and a jury while emphasizing the significance of solving Chavez's murder after 14 years.

00:00 — Disclaimer and Intro

03:00 — The Case Goes Cold

10:00 — Investigative Genetic Genealogy

16:00 — The DNA Match

20:00 — The Defense's Case

24:00 — What Background Checks Really Tell Us

Want to send us a juicy true crime story to cover? Follow and DM us:

Instagram

https://www.instagram.com/truecrimeinrealestate/

YouTube

https://www.youtube.com/@TrueCrimeinRealEstate