Egg Freezing in Prison: The High Court’s Decision in Smith
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
ご購入は五十タイトルがカートに入っている場合のみです。
カートに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
Egg Freezing in Prison: The High Court’s Decision in Smith
-
ナレーター：
-
著者：
Send us Fan Mail
In Smith v Chief Executive, Queensland Corrective Services, the High Court of Australia unanimously held that egg freezing is not “assisted reproductive technology” under Queensland’s Corrective Services Act. This means a prisoner can seek approval to freeze her eggs. Stephen Page, fertility lawyer and accredited family law specialist, walks through the four judgments and what they say about prisoners’ basic human entitlements.
In this episode:
- How Ms Smith’s application to freeze her eggs, made at 32, was refused and went through the Supreme Court and Court of Appeal before her High Court win, including costs orders in her favour
- The joint judgment of Acting Chief Justice Gordon and Justice Beech-Jones, and its reference to the right to procreate
- Justice Edelman’s view that ART means procedures capable by themselves of achieving reproduction
- Justice Gleeson’s reasoning on humane containment and the special needs of female prisoners
- Justice Jagot’s firm rejection of the argument that unwanted sterility could be part of a prisoner’s punishment
📞 Need advice? Contact Page Provan Family & Fertility Lawyers.
🌐 https://pageprovan.com.au
Made by Law Firm Marketing Experts, Practice Proof
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
まだレビューはありません