『Education Futures』のカバーアート

Education Futures

Education Futures

著者: Svenia Busson & Laurent Jolie
無料で聴く

【Amazonプライム会員限定】今ならプレミアムプランが4か月 月額99円。

10月19日まで。※適用条件あり
A podcast about the future of education in the age of AI. We bring together interdisciplinary voices to explore how we can shape more desirable futures for learning.Copyright 2026 Svenia Busson & Laurent Jolie 社会科学
エピソード
  • Relational Intelligence: being human in the AI age
    2026/10/19
    Isabelle C. Hau is the Executive Director of the Stanford Accelerator for Learning. It’s a Stanford-wide effort hosted at the Graduate School of Education, and it brings together more than 100 faculty affiliates to connect learning science with practice and policy. She grew up in rural southern France and studied at Sciences Po Paris and ESSEC before earning her MBA at Harvard Business School. She began her career as a financier at Morgan Stanley.Before Stanford, she spent about a decade with the Omidyar Group. She founded and led the US Education initiative at Omidyar Network and was a founding partner of its spinout, Imaginable Futures, where she backed early-stage organizations including Khan Academy Kids, Ellevation and Handshake. She wrote Love to Learn: The Transformative Power of Care and Connection in Early Education (PublicAffairs, 2025) and the Stanford Social Innovation Review cover story “Welcome to the Era of Relational Intelligence.” She also serves on the Brookings Institution’s Global AI Taskforce and the EDSAFE AI Alliance steering committee, and she writes the weekly newsletter Small Talks.In this episode, Isabelle talks with Svenia Busson about:Relational intelligence (RQ) as the next stage of human intelligence after IQ and EQ, and why we need to decide on purpose what our humanity should becomeThe “relational recession”: fewer siblings, fewer friends, less play and less contact between generations, and how AI companionship is moving into that gapAI sycophancy: new Stanford and Oxford research on how chatbots that constantly agree with us make real human relationships feel harder and less rewardingAn 8-workshop pilot at Design Tech High on how to build relationships, including two sessions on conflict and repairAI literacy through tinkering instead of a fixed curriculum: the Stanford AI Tinkery and its new free network of schoolsEducation’s “Turing Trap” and what the latest PISA results show: AI without scaffolding hurts outcomes, while AI with good teaching support helpsWhere AI is showing real promise: comic-book science projects that made students more curious, an autism screening game that is 86% accurate, and Tutor CoPilot, which brings novice tutors up to the level of the best onesWhy AI-only tutors struggle to get used, how to measure relationships without reducing them to a score, and what K-12 can learn from medical educationResources mentionedIsabelle’s writingHau, I. C. (2025). Love to Learn: The Transformative Power of Care and Connection in Early Education. PublicAffairs. LinkHau, I. C. (2026). “Welcome to the Era of Relational Intelligence.” Stanford Social Innovation Review, 24(2), 26–35. LinkHau, I. C. (2026). “Why Human Connection Must Be at the Heart of Education in the AI Age.” World Economic Forum. LinkHau, I. C., & Schwartz, D. L. (2025/2026). “Avoiding Education’s Turing Trap.” Stanford Social Innovation Review. LinkHau, I. C. (2026). “Curiosity, Connection, and the Future of Learning.” Educational Leadership, 83(7). LinkResearch on AI sycophancy and relationshipsCheng, M., et al. (2026). “Sycophantic AI decreases prosocial intentions and promotes dependence.” Science, 391(6792). LinkIbrahim, L., et al. (2026). “Sycophantic AI makes human interaction feel more effortful and less satisfying over time.” arXiv:2605.07912. LinkKim, P., Xie, Y., & Yang, S. (2025). “‘I am here for you’: How relational conversational AI appeals to adolescents, especially those who are socially and emotionally vulnerable.” arXiv:2512.15117. LinkResearch on AI tutoringTurano, C., Pihl, V., Agnew, C., Ziegler, L., & Loeb, S. (2026). AI Tutoring Is Not a Monolith: What We Actually Know. SCALE Initiative, Stanford Accelerator for Learning. LinkTutor CoPilot, Stanford National Student Support Accelerator. LinkStanford initiativesStanford Accelerator for Learning. LinkStanford AI Tinkery. Link
    続きを読む 一部表示
    51 分
  • Purpose before tools: a values-led AI plan for schools
    2026/10/08

    Alison "Ali" Gellett leads The Big AI Project at the Oasis Big Education Institute. The project aims to give every school in the UK and the Republic of Ireland what it needs to approach AI safely, ethically and strategically. Ali has 30 years of experience in educational leadership across teaching, multi-academy trust (MAT) executive leadership and local government. She is a Fellow of the Royal Society of Arts.

    For the past decade, Ali has focused on transforming the education sector by co-designing solutions with schools. She founded and runs the My Future programme, which teaches careers, aspirations and essential skills to primary school children. Since 2021 it has reached more than 35,000 children and enabled over 800,000 encounters between children and employers. It is funded by Essex County Council and has just launched its first London pilot. The Big AI Project grew out of Big Education's Rethinking School programme and is funded by Salesforce. It is free and AI-agnostic, and its materials were designed by teachers and quality-assured by Professor Rose Luckin's team at Educate Ventures Research. After a pilot with more than 230 schools, it is now rolling out nationally. That includes a region-wide partnership with the Liverpool City Region Combined Authority covering its 400–500 schools. Ali co-authored The Big AI Project report (March 2026).

    In this episode, Ali talks with Svenia Busson about:

    • Why a school's AI strategy should start with vision, purpose and pedagogy, not with choosing tools
    • Building a coalition of 50+ partners around shared values, and keeping commercial and political motives out of the room
    • A four-hour, AI-agnostic training for heads — and why their confidence rises from 1–2 out of 5 to 4–5 out of 5
    • AI literacy from age 3 to 14, with prediction games, bias and stereotyping activities, and class agreements not to share misinformation
    • Anthropomorphism, deepfakes and the AI tool that erased the features of a child with Down's syndrome from a nursery resource
    • "Truth has gone": misinformation, young people's mental health, and a million 16–25-year-olds not in education, employment or training
    • Why human connection and essential skills matter more than ever in a world full of AI
    • The Good Future Foundation AI Quality Mark, and why schools that go it alone end up making their job harder

    続きを読む 一部表示
    53 分
  • Does it really work? Evidence over hype in EdTech
    2026/10/05

    Dr. Ola Ozernov-Palchik is a cognitive neuroscientist who studies how the brain learns to read and, more and more, how AI should (and shouldn't) be used to help it. She is a Research Scientist at MIT's McGovern Institute for Brain Research, a Research Assistant Professor at Boston University Wheelock College of Education & Human Development, and Associate Director of Translational Research in BU's AI & Education Initiative. She got her start in research almost by accident: as an international psychology student, she landed her first research job at the Institute for Reading Research at Southern Methodist University because she spoke Russian.

    That job led her to cognitive neuroscience, a PhD in Cognitive Science at Tufts, and early work with Dr. Nadine Gaab at Boston Children's Hospital on some of the first studies to predict dyslexia from kindergarten, followed by a postdoc with John Gabrieli at MIT. She has published 30+ peer-reviewed papers, including a recent Nature Communications study showing the brain's language network is already adult-like by age 4. She received the International Dyslexia Association's Early Career Award, and she is President of New England Research on Dyslexia and Associate Editor of Scientific Studies of Reading.

    She founded and directs the Evidence-Based AI in Learning (EVAL) Collaborative, a partnership between BU Wheelock and the Hariri Institute for Computing. EVAL holds AI learning tools to the evidence standard we'd expect of a medical intervention. Its first AI in Learning Challenge drew 35 companies and chose Amira Learning for a free, independent randomized controlled trial. She also co-built KIVA, an open-source AI reading companion that won a 2026 Tools Competition award.

    In this episode, Ola talks with Svenia Busson about:

    • How the brain learns to read: repurposing circuits for vision and language, the "visual word form area," and why b and d are so hard to tell apart
    • What causes dyslexia: phonological processing, family history, and why reading ability sits on a continuum
    • Why decades of reading science still don't reach classrooms, with the US as a case study: only ~40% of fourth graders read proficiently on NAEP
    • Why no one checks edtech the way medicines are checked: schools buy tools based on user numbers rather than learning outcomes, and some districts are now banning AI outright
    • Inside the EVAL Collaborative: pre-registered, open-science RCTs published regardless of outcome, and the first EVAL AI in Learning Challenge
    • Can an 8-month trial prove learning? Measurement models, gated technical reviews (including how well speech recognition handles accents and dialects), and evidence that builds up over time
    • Advice for edtech founders: collect evidence from day one, and edtech's "5% problem"
    • KIVA, skeptical first graders, and the "AI penalty": teachers rated AI tutoring responses higher than human ones until they were told they came from AI

    続きを読む 一部表示
    49 分
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
まだレビューはありません