『Did Strategy Cost Bitcoiners 150,000 BTC? | Parker Lewis of Zaprite』のカバーアート

Did Strategy Cost Bitcoiners 150,000 BTC? | Parker Lewis of Zaprite

Did Strategy Cost Bitcoiners 150,000 BTC? | Parker Lewis of Zaprite

無料で聴く

ポッドキャストの詳細を見る

Parker Lewis thinks bitcoin treasury companies may be doing the opposite of what Bitcoiners think they are doing. His argument is that investors have collectively saved about 150,000 fewer Bitcoin by buying these equities instead of Bitcoin. Parker believes Strategy's marketing is positioning Bitcoin as something other than currency and that's a huge risk. Parker spent his career in investment banking, credit restructuring and hedge funds before helping build Unchained, and he now leads Business Development at Zaprite.


I own Strategy stock. I also self custody, run a node and sold my real estate for Bitcoin. I came to Bitcoin for the Freedom, I stayed for the Number Go Up technology. Parker and I agree for the first forty three minutes, then we get to the question that actually divides us.


Does wrapping Bitcoin in public equities help Bitcoin adoption, or does it pull capital away from Bitcoin while recreating the financial system Bitcoin was designed to replace?


DO BITCOIN TREASURY COMPANIES ACTUALLY HELP BITCOIN ADOPTION? Parker separates the argument into two questions. Do the securities outperform simply saving in Bitcoin, and what happens when Bitcoin is marketed as the asset underneath a new layer of fiat instruments rather than as currency itself?


He explains:

- Why money printing is the fundamental problem in our financial system, and why BTC's finite supply will force the Fiat world to reach a breaking point - Gradually, Then Suddenly

- How crypto competes with Bitcoin, and why Parker explains why humanity has always converges on one form of money

- Why buying a Bitcoin treasury company at a premium can leave you with less Bitcoin, even when the company keeps acquiring more

- Why perpetual preferreds create a risk investors may misunderstand, even when they trade back to par

- What he would choose between a treasury company and a spot ETF, despite not advocating for either


Views expressed by the host & guest(s) are their own and are shared for general informational purposes only. Nothing here should be treated as medical, legal, or financial advice. This is Financial Entertainment.


0:00 Heart of a bull, mind of a strategist

3:19 Meet Parker Lewis

4:16 The problem is printing money

11:51 Crypto's use case explained

19:19 Do stablecoins solve anything?

27:21 Bitcoin was the first that worked

32:02 "I never learned why money was money"

43:11 We agree with each other, until NOW!

43:53 When the "suddenly" happens

50:06 The debt problem

57:32 A first and second class of Bitcoin holder?

1:03:16 Is the backlash about Saylor or the math?

1:06:12 "We turned Bitcoin into money"

1:09:37 Show me the incentive

1:16:29 "I am a shareholder in the company"

1:17:42 Strategy and the Bitcoin investors could have saved

1:21:07 Look at the scoreboard, choose the ETF

1:23:43 STRC, SATA and trading back to par


Follow Parker:

X: https://x.com/parkeralewis

Zaprite: https://zaprite.com

Gradually, Then Suddenly: https://thesaifhouse.com/


Follow Host:

X: https://x.com/benschmidtbtc


adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
まだレビューはありません