Summary
This message focuses on why G.K. Wallace believes Christians should be very cautious about Bible translations, especially in public teaching and worship. He argues that translation choices can shape doctrine, and he spends much of the talk defending the American Standard Version of 1901 and the King James Version as reliable public texts.

Wallace also examines several modern translations and claims they reflect sectarian, ecumenical, Calvinist, or modernist assumptions. His central concern is that altering wording can alter meaning, and that believers should guard carefully against teaching from a text that does not accurately represent God’s Word.

Summary

G.K. Wallace argues that Christians should treat the Bible with reverence and be careful about which translation they use in worship, teaching, and preaching. He focuses on how different modern versions can reflect theological bias, and why he считает the American Standard Version 1901 and the King James Version safer choices for public use.

Summary

In this lesson, G.K. Wallace argues for reverence toward Scripture and explains why he believes Christians should be careful about which Bible translation is used in teaching and worship. He focuses on the authority of the biblical text, the reliability of manuscript evidence, and the way translation choices can shape doctrine. Wallace’s point is simple and forceful: if Scripture is God’s word, then translation is not a minor issue. He uses several modern versions as examples to show how wording can affect beliefs about Christ, salvation, miraculous gifts, and the new birth.