『Dealing With Objections In Japan』のカバーアート

Dealing With Objections In Japan

Dealing With Objections In Japan

無料で聴く

ポッドキャストの詳細を見る

【Amazonプライム会員限定】今ならプレミアムプランが4か月 月額99円。

10月19日まで。※適用条件あり
Hearing "no" triggers something primal in most salespeople — the urge to push back immediately and win the point. As of 2025, with Japanese buyers increasingly comparing vendors across longer, more research-heavy purchase cycles than in the past, that instinct is more costly than ever: a rushed counter to an objection reads as pressure, not persuasion, in a market where relationship trust still outweighs closing speed. Sales training organisations like Dale Carnegie have long taught that the first job when facing an objection isn't to answer it — it's to slow down enough to hear what's actually being said. Why does immediately countering an objection usually backfire? Reacting to "no" on impulse is driven by emotion, not strategy, and it almost always weakens the sale rather than saving it. Hearing a rejection triggers a defensive instinct to justify, argue, or over-explain — but a client who has just voiced a concern isn't ready to be argued with, they're ready to be heard. This pattern shows up across sectors, from retail floor sales to complex B2B enterprise deals: the salesperson who jumps straight to rebuttal skips the step that actually uncovers what's wrong. Comparative research on negotiation across Japan, the US, and Europe consistently finds that pausing before responding correlates with higher deal-recovery rates. Do now: The next time you hear an objection, count to two silently before you speak. What is a "cushion" statement, and why does it change the outcome? A cushion is a neutral, non-committal statement that buys a few seconds to regroup instead of leaping into justification. If a client says "it's too expensive," a cushion response like "it's important to have good budget management" acknowledges the comment without conceding or arguing, keeping the conversation calm on both sides. This differs sharply from the transactional instinct to counter-argue immediately, and it mirrors techniques used in customer service de-escalation training worldwide. The pause created by a cushion isn't wasted time — it's the space that lets a salesperson ask "why" instead of "why not." Do now: Write down one cushion line you can use for your most common objection and rehearse it once today. Why is "it's too expensive" often just a headline, not the real objection? Surface-level objections like price frequently mask a different, unstated concern underneath. Much like retail shoppers who claim they dislike a colour rather than admit they can't afford an item, B2B buyers often deflect toward a safer, more socially acceptable reason. Treating the stated objection as the final answer means a salesperson may spend the rest of the call solving the wrong problem entirely. This gap between the "headline" objection and the real one is a recognised pattern across sales psychology, from consumer retail through to enterprise procurement. Do now: Next time you hear a price objection, resist responding to price at all until you've asked one more question. How do you dig deeper to uncover a client's real objection? Asking "why is that a problem?" and following up with "are there other reasons?" reliably surfaces the objections a client hasn't stated outright. The first question moves past the surface complaint toward the underlying concern — budget authority, internal politics, prior bad experiences, or timing. The second question protects against solving one objection only to be blindsided by a second, unspoken one later in the process. This two-question sequence works across industries and negotiation contexts because it shifts the salesperson from defending to listening. Do now: Add both questions to your next client call script and use them before offering any solution. How can you tell whether an objection is based on fact or misconception? Once the real objection is identified, the next step is determining whether it's grounded in accurate information or a misunderstanding — because the response required is completely different. A misconception, such as an outdated belief about delivery times, calls for a firm, evidence-backed correction. A legitimate concern, such as a genuine quality-related delivery delay, calls for acknowledgement, explanation, and a search for a workaround rather than denial. Confusing the two — arguing with a fact-based concern or apologising for a misconception — is one of the fastest ways to lose credibility mid-negotiation. Do now: Before your next objection-handling conversation, ask yourself: "Is this true, or is this a misunderstanding I can correct?" How should salespeople handle financial objections without discounting? Reframing the product as a solution that improves the client's business, rather than defending the price itself, is usually more effective than negotiating the number down. This shifts the conversation from cost to return, which resonates especially with finance-conscious buyers evaluating ROI over multiple quarters rather than a single upfront figure...
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
まだレビューはありません