『Crime Incident』のカバーアート

Crime Incident

Crime Incident

著者： OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT
無料で聴く

Crime Incident is a true crime podcast about murder investigations and the evidence they actually rest on.

Each Crime Incident episode rebuilds one case from the record: the police investigation as it really unfolded, the forensic evidence and the DNA that held up, the witness testimony that quietly fell apart, and what a jury finally decided. Some cases end in a verdict. Others end in an appeal, an exoneration, or a case file that has stayed open for forty years.

The catalog runs from famous murder trials to disappearances almost nobody covered. A missing person hunted as a suspect while his own body lay one floor above the crime scene. A killer caught by an embossed emblem on an envelope. A confession that arrived decades too late. A DNA profile matched to a phantom who never existed. Murders closed by forensic genetic genealogy, and murders where detectives are still asking for tips today.

Three rules hold in every Crime Incident episode. Confirmed evidence and disputed claims are never blurred together, and you are always told which is which. Victims are treated as people, not as plot devices. And when a case is still unsolved, you get its exact legal status, the reward if there is one, and the number to call.

Crime Incident is true crime for people who want the case file, not the rumor.

Crime Incident. The record, told straight.Copyright OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT ノンフィクション犯罪
エピソード
  • Thirty Years Without a Name: The Tent Girl Case

    Thirty Years Without a Name: The Tent Girl Case
    2026/10/29
    Thirty Years Without a Name: The Tent Girl Case

    In May 1968, a man collecting glass insulators beside U.S. Route 25 in Scott County, Kentucky, kicked open a bundle of canvas and found the body of a young woman. Investigators estimated her age at 16 to 19, the press called her Tent Girl, and a town buried her in 1971 under a donated headstone reading "Unidentified." Why did no missing person report exist anywhere in the country? How did one wrong number on an autopsy sheet aim thirty years of searching at the wrong people? And why did the man who finally named her turn out to be a Tennessee factory worker with a home computer?

    In this episode, we follow two searches. The first is the search for her name: Todd Matthews hears the story at a Halloween party in 1987, marries the daughter of the man who found the body, chases the case for 11 years, builds TentGirl.com, and in January 1998 finds an online classified ad from an Arkansas woman looking for her sister. DNA from an exhumed grave confirms it: Tent Girl was Barbara Ann Hackmann Taylor, 24, a wife and mother of an eight month old from Lexington, just a short drive away. The second search is the one nobody talks about: the hunt for her killer, which never really began, because the prime suspect, her carnival worker husband, died in 1987, uncharged, eleven years before she even had a name.

    Person: Barbara Ann "Bobbie" Hackmann Taylor, 24
    Date: Found May 17, 1968; identified April 1998
    Location: Georgetown, Scott County, Kentucky
    Case: Unidentified homicide victim named after 30 years
    Legal status: No one ever arrested or charged; the murder remains unsolved

    - The husband's lie that stopped any missing person report
    - The age estimate that froze the case for a generation
    - Todd Matthews, the cold call to Arkansas, and the DNA match
    - The family verdict carved into her new headstone
    - How one case seeded the Doe Network and NamUs

    The Tent Girl case gave Barbara Hackmann Taylor her name back and launched internet sleuthing, but the Tent Girl murder has never been solved.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    20 分
  • The Showing Was a Trap: The Lindsay Buziak Case

    The Showing Was a Trap: The Lindsay Buziak Case
    2026/10/28
    The Showing Was a Trap: The Lindsay Buziak Case

    On February 2, 2008, Lindsay Buziak, a 24 year old real estate agent, arrived at a million dollar home in Saanich, British Columbia, to show it to a couple she had never met. The appointment was a trap built specifically for her. Who was the woman with the strange foreign accent who called her personal cell number? Why was a burner phone bought months earlier, used only to lure Lindsay, then deactivated forever? And why did two killers leave behind no DNA, no fingerprints, and no motive anyone can prove?

    In this episode, we take the trap apart piece by piece: the fake buyers with the million dollar budget, the burner phone activated under the false name Paulo Rodriguez, the second phone used only to check its voicemail, the half built cul de sac with an escape route onto a main road, and the unidentified couple seen walking up to the house, including the blond woman in the distinctively patterned dress that remains the best public clue in the case. We follow the timeline minute by minute, the forensic void that stunned investigators, the police clearing of Jason Zailo and his family, the drug bust retaliation theory and who owns it, the FBI and RCMP task force, and the father who has walked for justice every February 2 for eighteen years.

    Person: Lindsay Elizabeth Buziak, 24, RE/MAX real estate agent
    Date: February 2, 2008
    Location: 1702 De Sousa Place, Saanich, Greater Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
    Case: Murder by stabbing during a staged home showing; unsolved
    Legal status: No arrests, no charges, no named suspects; investigation open and active with Saanich Police, RCMP and FBI; a related defamation lawsuit is unproven civil litigation, not a criminal finding

    - The late January call that made Lindsay uneasy and the instincts she voiced
    - The burner phone tradecraft revealed by a 2020 records disclosure
    - The clean crime scene and the reconstructed escape onto Torquay Drive
    - Cleared by police: the boyfriend, the alibi footage and the polygraph
    - Theories with owners: the drug bust link, the online confession, the internet accusations

    The Lindsay Buziak case remains one of Canada's most disturbing unsolved murders, and the question was never how the trap worked. It was why it was built for her.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    20 分
  • Her Car Drove Away Without Her: The Dorothy Jane Scott Case

    Her Car Drove Away Without Her: The Dorothy Jane Scott Case
    2026/10/26
    Her Car Drove Away Without Her: The Dorothy Jane Scott Case

    On May 28, 1980, Dorothy Jane Scott, a 32-year-old single mother, drove a coworker with a black widow spider bite to the UCI Medical Center in Orange, California. Shortly after midnight she walked out to get her car, and minutes later her white Toyota came speeding past her waiting coworkers, high beams blinding them, driver unseen. She was never seen alive again. Who had been calling her at work for months, reciting her own days back to her? Why did the man who confessed to a newspaper editor know about the spider bite and her scarf when neither had been made public? And who kept calling her mother for four years after she vanished?

    In this episode, we follow the Dorothy Jane Scott case from the anonymous calls that alternated between love and death threats, through the dead rose on her windshield and the karate lessons she started a week before she was taken, to the burning car in a Santa Ana alley, the June 1980 newsroom call ("I killed her. I killed Dorothy Scott."), and the construction site in Anaheim Hills where her remains surfaced in 1984 beside a turquoise ring and a watch stopped at 12:30.

    Person: Dorothy Jane Scott, 32, secretary and single mother
    Date: Disappeared shortly after midnight, May 29, 1980
    Location: Orange, Santa Ana and Anaheim, California
    Case: Stalking, abduction and murder; remains found August 6, 1984
    Legal status: Unsolved; no arrests in 46 years, open cold case with the Orange County Sheriff's Department

    - Months of stalking calls a decade before stalking was a crime
    - The hospital trip nobody planned and the fork it creates: followed, or known
    - The confessor who knew unpublished details, and the contradiction Pam Head exposed
    - Four years of untraceable calls to a grieving mother
    - The theories, each with an owner, and the suspect never named

    The Dorothy Jane Scott case remains one of America's most chilling unsolved stalking murders, and the voice she almost recognized has never been identified.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    20 分
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
まだレビューはありません