Christianity’s exclusive claims are controversial, but the Bible insists that Jesus is the only way to God. The main difference between Christianity and all other worldviews–that the founder of Christianity is not merely a teacher who shows the path to God, but is himself the only path to God–makes clear why this exclusive claim is an essential part of Christianity’s claims.

If God cannot be accessed by ordinary human thoughts, efforts, or experience, then he can only be knowable if he chooses to reveal himself. Because all other religions reject this core Christian belief, Christianity’s exclusivity is really just its uniqueness. In other words, any attempt to turn Christianity into just another option among many for getting right with God is an effort to make Christianity something it isn’t.

Jesus is God, and to know God is to know him, and to know him is to know God.

Hosts: Aaron Mueller and Chuck Rathert

Subscribe to the show at https://cacg.saintjamesglencarbon.org.

To comment on this episode, visit https://saintjamesglencarbon.org/cacg-ep0150.

Christianity is a missionary religion, and Christians are expected to share their faith in Jesus with unbelievers. But how should Christians go about arguing for the truth of the biblical story? One common strategy is to offer evidence—whether through historical arguments for the resurrection, the compatibility of science with biblical cosmology, fulfilled prophecy, or archaeological discoveries that confirm biblical accounts. However, when presented with this evidence, many people will either offer counter-evidence or simply refuse to engage. It becomes clear that evidence alone is rarely enough to convince someone of the truth of Christianity.

Because of this, those who subscribe to presuppositional apologetics argue that all people hold unprovable, foundational assumptions—or presuppositions—that shape what they believe. These presuppositions serve as frameworks through which we view all evidence. If someone presupposes the existence of God, the reality of the resurrection, and the need for salvation, they are naturally receptive to Christian claims. Conversely, if someone presupposes that God does not exist, or that God becoming human is an impossibility, they will likely reject Christian claims regardless of convincing evidence. Therefore, presuppositional apologetics focuses less on proving Christianity’s claims than it does on exposing the hidden assumptions of unbelievers, reframing Christianity as a coherent worldview, and praying that the Holy Spirit transforms hearts and minds to align with God's truth.

Hosts: Aaron Mueller and Chuck Rathert

Subscribe to the show at https://cacg.saintjamesglencarbon.org.

To comment on this episode, visit https://saintjamesglencarbon.org/cacg-ep0149.

Hebrews 2 says it pleased the Father to make Jesus perfect through suffering, but this raises an immediate question: if Jesus is the eternal second person of the Trinity, holy and righteous in his very essence, why does this verse state that until his death on the cross he was somehow imperfect? The key to understanding this text is drawing a distinction between moral perfection and vocational perfection. Jesus has always been morally perfect, completely righteous and holy, and yet that holiness and righteousness are not able to accomplish his vocation of redeeming his creation back to himself until he performs the act–in time and space–of dying on the cross. In this sense, Jesus’ suffering is his perfection, the thing his glory and exaltation depend on. This is why the Bible insists that the suffering of Christians has deep, intrinsic value: God binds the suffering of his people to his own suffering on the cross, and uses this “fellowship of suffering” to embody his redemption in his world.

Hosts: Aaron Mueller and Chuck Rathert

Subscribe to the show at https://cacg.saintjamesglencarbon.org.

To comment on this episode, visit https://saintjamesglencarbon.org/cacg-ep0148.

Hebrews 6:1-6 seems to imply that if someone who was once genuinely converted loses that salvation they are not able to repent and return once again to the Christian faith, but how does that fit with stories of apostasy and restoration from Scripture and from the real lives of many Christians? Peter, for instance, confesses that Jesus is the true Messiah, denies him immediately before his death, and then returns to become a pillar of the earliest church. What then, does the Hebrew text mean?

The answer has to do with the historical context: threatened with persecution, at least some Christians in the church, who received the epistle of Hebrews, have been tempted to return to the safety of the currently-legal Jewish synagogue. The preacher of Hebrews warns them that by returning to an expression of faith that denies the salvific reality of the death of Jesus, they cut themselves off–however devout their synagogue worship will be–from that salvation, and by doing so they implicitly confess that the one-off sacrifice of Jesus was not good enough and that God must provide a different sacrifice. If they want to experience the grace of God, they must confess instead that Jesus is the God-man crucified for the sins of the world.

In other words, the text does not deny that those who apostasize are forever cut off from grace, but it does teach that those who apostasize can only return to God’s grace by believing in the crucified and risen Jesus.

Hosts: Aaron Mueller and Chuck Rathert

Subscribe to the show at https://cacg.saintjamesglencarbon.org.

To comment on this episode, visit https://saintjamesglencarbon.org/cacg-ep0147.

A common urban myth about Christian origins sometimes gets passed around when people talk about the Bible is that no one can really know what the Bible says since the translations we have now are just translations of older translations. The Bible says that all of scripture is “breathed out” by God, but does this mean that our English translations can equally lay claim to this divine origin?

Chuck and Aaron talk about how translations work and about the decisions scholars must make as they try to the best of their ability to communicate ideas written in one language into another language without changing those ideas. The different theories of how this is done - whether literally or as a dynamic equivalent - are all in pursuit of communicating as faithfully as possible the message God has in his word. In doing this, the translators do not translate from previous English translations but from the oldest and best Greek and Hebrew manuscripts we have available to us.

Hosts: Aaron Mueller and Chuck Rathert

Subscribe to the show at https://cacg.saintjamesglencarbon.org.

To comment on this episode, visit https://saintjamesglencarbon.org/cacg-ep0146.

The Bible teaches that at the end of this current age, when Jesus returns, God will finally and eternally judge all people. But what is the actual basis of that judgment? What does it have to do with our lives right now? And how can we know where we stand?

For Protestants who believe that salvation is by grace through faith alone, it may come as a surprise that every time the final judgment is described in Scripture, it is done on the basis of works. In other words, on that last day, believers will be revealed by the way they lived in Jesus’ name, while those who do not know Christ will be revealed by the works they failed to do.

So, how does this final judgment shape our reality today? By pulling the justification which we receive at the judgment seat of Christ into the present, faith allows us to know right now that we are not guilty before God. This divine declaration—that we have infinite value because we are united to Jesus—forms the Christian’s identity now, assuring us of who we really are. Join us as we look at how the final judgment allows us to hear the Lord say face-to-face what He has already promised in His Word: “Well done, good and faithful servant.”

Hosts: Aaron Mueller and Chuck Rathert

Subscribe to the show at https://cacg.saintjamesglencarbon.org.

To comment on this episode, visit https://saintjamesglencarbon.org/cacg-ep145.

In Mark 10:15, Jesus says that anyone “who does not receive the kingdom of God like a child shall not enter it.” This text has been misunderstood in different ways through the years since Jesus has said it. One listener who had grown up with the King James Version (which translates this verse, “whoever shall not receive the kingdom of God as a little child, he shall not enter therein.” The word “as” can mean “like”, but in this sentence it can also mean “when”; in other words, “whoever shall not receive the kingdom of God when a child…”. Within the context of the New Testament, this clearly different meaning makes no sense, because many adults come to faith in Jesus and enter God’s kingdom long after their childhood is over. But our listener remembers preachers and teachers in their church putting pressure on young children to make a declaration of faith for Christ before it was too late and they missed their childhood’s chance.

This sort of emotional pressure is, of course, unbiblical. But so is the misunderstanding of this verse’s theology. Jesus is teaching his disciples that the only way to come to him is the way a child does - with simple faith that one can receive a gift without doing anything to earn it, and an equally simple faith that Jesus meets our almost selfish need for his love and affection.

Hosts: Aaron Mueller and Chuck Rathert

Subscribe to the show at https://cacg.saintjamesglencarbon.org.

To comment on this episode, visit https://saintjamesglencarbon.org/cacg-ep144.

Justification is one of the most important words in the Bible because it’s one of the most important aspects of humanity. The quest to find a reason for one’s existence - in other words, “to justify” oneself - is irresistible.

In a culture which separates the “secular” from the “sacred”, Christians sometimes reduce justification to be a religious or moral issue: we can not do enough good works to make God happy with us, so if we want to be saved we can’t rely on our good works but on Jesus alone. This truth is plainly taught by Scripture, but this view narrows down the scope of justification to the “religious” part of our lives. In this way it becomes easy to go to church, trust in Jesus to get us to heaven when we die, and thus feel justified, while simultaneously going to work on Monday morning and finding our reason for existence in our career success, earnings, number and quality of our relationships.

If justification by faith in Jesus means anything, it must be broad enough to allow me to find my identity in Christ in every aspect of my life. I can never make enough money, or have enough relational success, or be respectable enough, to tell myself I am worthy of existing - only Jesus can love and accept me enough for me to be able to say “I have value because Jesus says my existence is justified since he died and rose from the dead for me.” This concept is what we call justification by faith in Jesus.

Hosts: Aaron Mueller and Chuck Rathert

Subscribe to the show at https://cacg.saintjamesglencarbon.org.

To comment on this episode, visit https://saintjamesglencarbon.org/cacg-ep143.