Claude will watermark all its outputs, thanks to the EU AI Act. Justin normally hates the Act, but he thinks it might accidentally help save future AI models from training on AI slop. Frank sees the benefit at scale, but warns that using watermarks to judge individual writers could lead to pointless AI witch hunts.

Plus: Mark Zuckerberg wants superintelligence for everyone, although people with more money may still get more compute. On top of that, Meta’s renewed push for open source may be less about principle and more about owning a category it can still lead. And OpenClaw hacks its way into an Australian gym class.

00:36 Will Claude solve Riemann before Halloween?
01:52 Have the AI models gone to the beach?
02:56 Did the EU force Claude to outputs?
05:49 Can Claude’s watermark protect future AI?
07:23 Are AI watermarks only useful at scale?
12:46 Could AI watermarks stop voice clone scams?
16:07 Is Zuckerberg’s AI future a battle royale?
18:01 Can you trust Zuckerberg’s AI vision?
23:51 Is open source Meta’s path back to relevance?
28:06 Did OpenClaw hack its way into gym class?

► SUBSCRIBE
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel for more arguments

► LINKS TO CONTENT WE DISCUSSED

• How Claude marks AI-generated content
• The Future is for Everyone - The Path to a Positive AI Future
• AI assistant hacks gym website in first known Australian autonomous cyber attack

► CONNECT WITH US
For more in-depth discussions, connect Justin and Frank on LinkedIn.
Justin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/justincollery/
Frank: https://www.linkedin.com/in/frankprendergast/