『California v. EPA: Using the Congressional Review Act to Roll Back State Waivers』のカバーアート

California v. EPA: Using the Congressional Review Act to Roll Back State Waivers

California v. EPA: Using the Congressional Review Act to Roll Back State Waivers

無料で聴く

ポッドキャストの詳細を見る

【Amazonプライム会員限定】今ならプレミアムプランが4か月 月額99円。

10月19日まで。※適用条件あり
In September 2026, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia preliminarily enjoined the EPA from sending four Clean Air Act waivers to Congress for potential repeal under the Congressional Review Act (CRA). These waivers have allowed California to enact its own vehicle emission standards. Judge Beryl Howell held the CRA's bar on judicial review does not reach an agency's threshold determination that its action is a "rule," and found California had standing to challenge the EPA's June 2026 press release announcing it was transmitting the rules to Congress. What may happen next in this case; and what does this litigation suggest about the limits on using the CRA as a deregulatory tool? Join us for a panel discussing the decision and the broader state of play on CRA issues under the current administration.
Featuring:

Michael Buschbacher, Managing Partner, Boyden Gray PLLC
Andrew Ceonzo, Counsel to U.S. Senator Schmitt and the Senate Judiciary Committee
(Moderator) Daniel M. Flores, Senior Counsel, Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, U.S. House of Representatives
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
まだレビューはありません