We figured out that women and men were equal thousands of years ago. So why did it take so long for the world to catch up?

Arguments for gender equality stretch back at least 2,300 years. Plato imagined men and women ruling together. And yet, again and again, the idea surfaced, stalled, disappeared and returned. In this episode of A Short History of Saving the World, Angus Hervey and historian Ada Palmer take the long view of gender equality: from ancient Greece and Renaissance Europe to the suffragettes, feminism and the unfinished work of progress today. Along the way, they arrive at the bigger question - do we really believe that all people are equal? Because perhaps the hardest part of equality isn't changing the law. It's changing our minds.

In this conversation:

• Why can an idea win centuries before the world actually changes?
• Did women have a Renaissance?
• Why does progress so often provoke a backlash?
• Have we mistaken the first 10% of gender equality for 90%?
• And what happens if we decide feminism has already won?

Timestamps:

1:06 The Quarrel: 2,300 Years of Gender Equality
2:36 Why Good Ideas Take Centuries
7:39 Equality is never a Straight Line
8:48 There Is No Single History of Women
10:27 The Papal Hostess
13:48 Progress, But for Whom?
16:17 Do Bodies Define Gender Roles?
22:01 The World’s First Bestseller
26:17 The Iceberg Problem
28:00 Why Progress Creates Backlash
29:29 How Ada Genders Her Characters
31:17 How Early Does Gender Bias Begin?
33:18 A Future Without Gender?
37:33 Category: Cage or Crowbar?
40:29 The Wounds We Inherit
43:06 Most Underrated and Overrated Milestones in the History of Gender Equality
56.17: Do We Really Believe that People Are Equal?
53:46: Footnotes of A Short History

Subscribe & follow:
If you enjoyed this episode, follow the podcast and leave a review - it helps more people find these stories.

Production credits:
Hosted by Angus Hervey and Ada Palmer
Produced by Amy Davoren-Rose, Fix The News
Audio production: Anthony Badolato, Hear That!

What if artificial intelligence isn't just about machines? What if it's part of a much longer story about how we understand ourselves?

In every age, humans have questioned what separates us from animals, machines, and each other. In this episode, Angus Hervey and Ada Palmer explore our changing ideas of consciousness and intelligence. From Descartes and religion to Astro Boy and the futures we once imagined, this conversation connects our history of consciousness with today's AI debate.

In this conversation:

• What Descartes would make of artificial intelligence?
• Why Japan gave Astro Boy a birth certificate?
• What Ada's science fiction epic, Terra Ignota, got right about AI
• And is consciousness really a yes-or-no question?

Timestamps:

00:54 What Descartes would say if you gave him Claude?

04:51 How our theories of consciousness have changed history

09:22 How Astro Boy influenced Silicon Valley

11:16 The history of Manga

19:12 Do you need to be alive to be conscious?

21:50 What Aristotle got right in defining the differences between things

24:37 Appetites. Passions. Reason.

29:32 The religious debate - Body v The Soul

32:10 Dante’s Inferno unlocked

34:24 Our history of monsters

36:49 The Empathy Sphere

41:08 The Power of Science Fiction

42:37 What Ada’s novel 'Terra Ignota' reveals about consciousness, rights and intelligence

45:18 Our desire for First Contact

47:08 How the future failed us in the year 2000

53:09 What Montaigne learned from concussion

01:00:32 Final Thoughts

Subscribe & follow:
If you enjoyed this episode, follow the podcast and leave a review - it helps more people find these stories.

Production credits:
Hosted by Angus Hervey and Ada Palmer
Produced by Amy Davoren-Rose, Fix The News
Audio production: Anthony Badolato, Hear That!

Every generation thinks it’s living through an unprecedented information crisis. But according to historian Ada Palmer, we’ve been here before.

In this episode, Angus and Ada explore the first great information revolution - from Machiavelli hiding The Prince and Leonardo da Vinci’s coded notebooks to the printing press, censorship, and Shakespeare’s anxieties about misinformation.

In this episode:

· Is fake news really new?

· What happens when information suddenly becomes available to everyone?

· Why do new technologies amplify both progress and extremism?

· Are social media and the internet following a familiar historical pattern?

· And… what does fruit have to do with democracy?

From Renaissance Florence to modern algorithms, this conversation reveals how societies adapt to upheaval - and why history may offer clues for navigating today’s information chaos. Because the world doesn’t get saved once. It gets saved - again and again.

Timestamps:

00:50 Why Machiavelli hid The Prince
03:48 Why Leonardo wasn’t really a scientist
06:37 The printing press changes everything
12:48 “Children of gold, parents of iron”
19:36 What social media has in common with the Renaissance
23:09 Why censorship rarely works
30:21 Is change actually accelerating?
35:15 The case for free speech
38:27 The strange reason cantaloupe helped spark revolution

48:51 Democracy, experts & the future

Subscribe & follow:
If you enjoyed this episode, follow the podcast and leave a review - it helps more people find these stories.

Production credits:
Hosted by Angus Hervey and Ada Palmer
Produced by Amy Davoren-Rose, Fix The News
Audio production: Anthony Badolato, Hear That!