A Real Couples Therapist Reacts to Showtime's "Couples Therapy"
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
-
ナレーター:
-
著者:
Couples arrive carrying the portable version of their problem. He is not spontaneous. She cannot decide about children. They have stopped having sex, or they have it on a schedule. A few questions in, the portable version gets heavy, because it was never the whole load.
Dr. Emma Smith and Dr. Alivia Stehlik finally watched Couples Therapy, four years late by Emma's count, and this episode follows what each of them saw: Alivia's verdict, thirty seconds in, that a couples therapist is underpaid; Emma's ball, which a therapist holds just long enough for a couple to readjust their grip; and the way a complaint about spontaneity descends, layer by layer, into aloneness against connection.
Along the way they compare what it costs to carry two people's pain at once, and where a therapist puts it down: in consultation groups, in supervision with someone who started practicing in 1982, and inside an ethics code strict enough that Emma cannot ask a client for a Google review.
From there the conversation moves through why therapy begins in the middle of the fight, why the best therapists keep consulting other therapists, and what a sex therapist adds that the series does not, including one firm clinical line: abuse is an individual problem, and couples therapy is not where it gets treated. It closes on the partner who is waiting. Emma's argument is that when sex is off the table, people narrow what counts as being chosen to a sliver, and the narrowing prolongs the disappointment it is trying to escape.
The question left open: if the one thing you count as proof of being wanted went missing for a year, what would you have to start counting?
Full show notes
Sponsor: Nine to Kind Planners, code EMMA20 for 20% off. https://ninetokind.com/
Questions for the show: http://forms.gle/sS7z5AFH1DohJjAU6