Value-4-Value

NO ID Episode 42 - The People's Tree

So you think you’re liberty-minded? But you haven’t followed the self-ownership argument all the way to its logical conclusion? Neither, apparently, has anybody else. This week we deconstruct the media's coverage of the Spokane wildfire responses, the River-Keeper's environmental activism, "Dr" Fauxchi's home state, the mythology of benevolent government, public education, taxation, bureaucracy, and the curious ways government institutions manage "protect" us from...problems they seem to create.

Timestamps:

(00:01:27) Liberty-oriented content and the wrong podcast

(00:07:22) The state as your protector

(00:11:20) Government schools and the Prussian model

(00:15:30) Ruby Ridge and the monopoly on force

(00:17:18) Spokane schools reopen after the fires

(00:24:00) Inflation and federal money

(00:30:00) Idaho development and federal funding

(00:35:00) Government funding and the nonprofit ecosystem

(00:41:38) The Idaho Department of Labor comes calling

(00:46:00) The $145 government check

(00:48:00) Billing the government for its own bureaucracy

(00:52:00) Idaho agriculture and the sheep problem

(00:56:00) Idaho migration and development

(01:00:00) The future of Idaho

(01:07:15) Paul’s Fauxchi correction

(01:16:30) The value model strikes again

(01:25:00) Lawn care, trees, and government regulation

(01:31:13) The Spokane Riverkeeper

(01:41:27) Firefighters, back burning, and arson accusations

NO ID is Idaho's mainstream media deconstruction podcast, covering politics, government, local media, and the stories behind the stories shaping the Inland Northwest.

If you find value in our show, return some value: Share it with someone, leave a rating or review, or become an executive producer.

Connect with NO ID:

Submit stories, tips, clips, articles, boots-on-the-ground reports, or any other contributions to noidpod@gmail.com.

Patreon

Instagram

Facebook

X

TikTok

Disclaimer: Natural law exists whether you acknowledge it, reject it, or legislate against it. It is inherent and does not depend on your or anybody else's agreement with it.