278. About the Cornell Campus Case
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
-
ナレーター:
-
著者:
Nancy and Sarah talk about the Cornell case. Maybe you’ve heard about it? They talk about drinking and consent, college bacchanals, cultural rot, the weird dehumanization of technology and porn, and how we can point fingers in so many directions, but ultimately, your life is your responsibility.
Questions on the table: What should the legal definition of rape be? How involved should colleges become in the private sex lives of their students? Are those students children — or adults? This is complicated business. Camille Paglia comes in and knocks some shit over on the table, because well, Aunt Camille. We love her, but she goes a little harder than Nancy and Sarah. We’re softer touches on this one.
Also discussed:
* The ‘00s went off the fucking rails
* Sarah’s IQ drops plummets when she’s sprung for a guy … “Where is Mexico?”
* Not gonna put my tongue on THAT third rail today …
* “Dear colleague” → Title IX → kangaroo courts
* Is Nancy a vampire? (Answer: Yes)
* Sarah reads a letter from a former frat boy
* “What about Skims!??”
* Wallace’s first voluntary appearance on a video pod
* Use lotion, start slow
* Rick Muthaf*cking Rubin can narrate us into the apocalypse
Plus, shout-outs to Yale and Bret Easton Ellis, the cigarette alto of Sarah’s audio book, the joy of Alamo Drafthouse, and much more!